Dev-C++ compiling problem

[=?iso-8859-1?q?______S=FC_Keith_Chakotay_von_Carpa]

Re: Dev-C++ compiling problem

On Oct 15, 5:34 am, "Joachim Schmitz" <nospam.j...@sc hmitz-digital.de>
wrote:

" Sü Keith Chakotay von Carpati" <is_dat_right_I m_russ...@engin eer.com>
schrieb im Newsbeitragnews :1192439414.013 977.171270@q3g2 000prf.googlegr oups.com...
On Oct 15, 2:51 am, "Joachim Schmitz" <nospam.j...@sc hmitz-digital.de>
wrote:
>
>
>

" Sü Keith Chakotay von Carpati" <is_dat_right_I m_russ...@engin eer.com>
schrieb im
Newsbeitragnews :1192438089.684 463.87720@q3g20 00prf.googlegro ups.com...
On Oct 15, 2:30 am, jacob navia <ja...@nospam.o rgwrote:

>

Sü Keith Chakotay von Carpati wrote:
Of course; however, how can someone talk about the C language without
having a working compiler? You tell me.
It's like going on a battlefield without a rifle.
If in a battle your riffle jams, would you tell the General responsible
for
tactics/strategie of the battle, or take it to a weapon shop for repair?

Depends on the army, I guess.
It shouldn't be a problem to ask a comerade soldier
to give your rifle a kick or two in a proper way.
By the time you get to the weapon shop it may be too late...

>
Then ask your comrade soldier over in a newsgroup dealing with rifles, erh,
dev-cc 8-)
>
Bye, Jojo- Hide quoted text -
>
- Show quoted text -

I don't think there are such newsgroups, where they talk about dev-cc
That's why I've posted it in here.

[Tor Rustad]

Re: Dev-C++ compiling problem

Sü Keith Chakotay von Carpati wrote:

[...]

Of course; however, how can someone talk about the C language without
having a working compiler? You tell me.

A co-worker of mine, wrote programs for a period of ca. 3 years, without
a single compile error.

--
Tor <torust [at] online [dot] no>

C-FAQ: http://c-faq.com/

[Andreas E. Mueller]

Re: Dev-C++ compiling problem

Well... ehm... okay... I think this question doesn't belong here, as
everybody else thinks it too...

But just to help you a bit.

Vista has some new bugs^H^H^H^Hfea tures about how to handle the security
level of the actual user.

By RTFM and "trial and failure", I've found out that even if you are an
administrator, all the programs run by default in normal user mode, till
you run them as "administrator" .

To install a program, vista almost always switches in administrator mode.

After that... if you execute the program you've installed in normal user
mode (as you and others did), vista will create an empty folder with the
program's name under eg. "C:\Users\UserX \AppData".

It's a kind of a fake root directory for the application (trying to copy
chroot from Un*x?). If the program has configuration files under
"C:\Program Files\ProgramX" , it won't read them if you run it as normal
user. It will try to read configuration files from the created fake
directory under "C:\Users\UserX \AppData\Progra mX", where it actually won't
find them, until you create them. This must produce the failure "file not
found" (at least I think so).

But the problem with an IDE like Dev-C++ (it is an *IDE*, not a compiler)
is, that it has to call some other programs like the c pre-processor and
the compiler (call it gcc via cygwin in your situation) too.

As you can see, a program called by another program in vista, doesn't
necessarily mean that it will run under the same user privileges the
caller-program (Dev-C++ or something else) called it.

Maybe to get Dev-C++ working, try *running it as administrator* (for more
information google it by yourself. If this doesn't work, then you should
better change your OS to Linux or Opensolaris or even WinXP (if you don't
play games with your Computer, then you will probably not need this crappy
piece of OS).

On the other side... Even the Microsoft Visual Studio(TM) (*laugh*)
doesn't run properly under vista, why should Dev-C++ run the way it
should?!? (These guys have to make their own programs to run correctly on
their own platform first!)

At the end...

If this would be a forum I would say:

<quote>
Administrator could not decide whether to move this thread under
microsoft.publi c.windows.vista .general or
microsoft.publi c.windows.vista .security !?!
</quote>

Personally I would never use vista to develop c or even c++ programs.

Greets,
Andy

PS: I'm still in exercise with my English. And sorry about my typos, I was
in a hurry!

[CBFalconer]

Re: Dev-C++ compiling problem

Sü Keith Chakotay von Carpati wrote:

jacob navia <ja...@nospam.o rgwrote:

>Sü Keith Chakotay von Carpati wrote:
>>

.... snip ...

>>

>>gcc.exe: installation problem, cannot exec `cc1': No such file
>>or directory
>>>
>>make.exe: *** [test21.o] Error 1
>>>
>>Execution terminated

>>
>Please call DevCpp help desk. We are not DevCpp help desk, this
>group is about the C language.
>>
>Thanks in advance for your understanding.

>

.... snip ...

>
Of course; however, how can someone talk about the C language
without having a working compiler? You tell me.
It's like going on a battlefield without a rifle.

Please snip signatures. You go to the manufacture/distributor/ or
issuers web-page or office etc. Not here, where we discuss the C
language.

--
Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems.
<http://cbfalconer.home .att.net>



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

[Richard Bos]

Re: Dev-C++ compiling problem

CBFalconer <cbfalconer@yah oo.comwrote:

Sü Keith Chakotay von Carpati wrote:

Of course; however, how can someone talk about the C language
without having a working compiler? You tell me.
It's like going on a battlefield without a rifle.

>
Please snip signatures.

That is...

--
Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems.
<http://cbfalconer.home .att.net>
>
>
>
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>

....not something _you_ should be telling him.

Richard

[Keith Thompson]

Re: Dev-C++ compiling problem

rlb@hoekstra-uitgeverij.nl (Richard Bos) writes:

CBFalconer <cbfalconer@yah oo.comwrote:

[...]

>Please snip signatures.

[...]

...not something _you_ should be telling him.

Why not? Sure, Chuck's signature is too long, and it happens to have
an embedded "-- "; that has no bearing on whether signatures should be
snipped when posting followups.

--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keit h) kst-u@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
San Diego Supercomputer Center <* <http://users.sdsc.edu/~kst>
"We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this."
-- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"

[Richard Heathfield]

Re: Dev-C++ compiling problem

Keith Thompson said:

rlb@hoekstra-uitgeverij.nl (Richard Bos) writes:

>CBFalconer <cbfalconer@yah oo.comwrote:

[...]

>>Please snip signatures.

[...]

>...not something _you_ should be telling him.

>
Why not? Sure, Chuck's signature is too long, and it happens to have
an embedded "-- "; that has no bearing on whether signatures should be
snipped when posting followups.

It's called "hypocrisy" , Keith. Chuck is telling people to observe
netiquette conventions, even though his signature block violates those
same conventions.

--
Richard Heathfield <http://www.cpax.org.uk >
Email: -http://www. +rjh@
Google users: <http://www.cpax.org.uk/prg/writings/googly.php>
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999

[Richard]

Re: Dev-C++ compiling problem

Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.orgwrites :

rlb@hoekstra-uitgeverij.nl (Richard Bos) writes:

>CBFalconer <cbfalconer@yah oo.comwrote:

[...]

>>Please snip signatures.

[...]

>...not something _you_ should be telling him.

>
Why not? Sure, Chuck's signature is too long, and it happens to have
an embedded "-- "; that has no bearing on whether signatures should be
snipped when posting followups.

How many times do you have to be reminded that "Chuck" posts with two
signatures thus not allowing some major newsreaders to correctly snip
the signature?

He is the ONLY person I know to do this and I must conclude that he is a
troll.

And yes we KNOW that teranews adds the second.

[Keith Thompson]

Re: Dev-C++ compiling problem

Richard <rgrdev@gmail.c omwrites:

Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.orgwrites :

>rlb@hoekstra-uitgeverij.nl (Richard Bos) writes:

>>CBFalconer <cbfalconer@yah oo.comwrote:

>[...]

>>>Please snip signatures.

>[...]

>>...not something _you_ should be telling him.

>>
>Why not? Sure, Chuck's signature is too long, and it happens to have
>an embedded "-- "; that has no bearing on whether signatures should be
>snipped when posting followups.

>
How many times do you have to be reminded that "Chuck" posts with two
signatures thus not allowing some major newsreaders to correctly snip
the signature?

Once was quite enough. Either snip it yourself or stop replying to
his articles.

--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keit h) kst-u@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
San Diego Supercomputer Center <* <http://users.sdsc.edu/~kst>
"We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this."
-- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"

[Kenny McCormack]

Re: Dev-C++ compiling problem

In article <47184f43.62341 683@news.xs4all .nl>,
Richard Bos <rlb@hoekstra-uitgeverij.nlwr ote:

>CBFalconer <cbfalconer@yah oo.comwrote:
>

>Sü Keith Chakotay von Carpati wrote:

Of course; however, how can someone talk about the C language
without having a working compiler? You tell me.
It's like going on a battlefield without a rifle.

>>
>Please snip signatures.

>
>That is...
>

>--
> Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
> Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems.
> <http://cbfalconer.home .att.net>
>>
>>
>>
>--
>Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>>

>
>...not something _you_ should be telling him.
>
>Richard

Indeed. Welcome to the group of CLC posters who have realized what a
hypocritical turd CBF is. Hope you enjoy your stay.

[Kenny McCormack]

Re: Dev-C++ compiling problem

In article <_-ednSJFLcaR-4XaRVnyvwA@bt.c om>,
Richard Heathfield <rjh@see.sig.in validwrote:

>Keith Thompson said:
>

>rlb@hoekstra-uitgeverij.nl (Richard Bos) writes:

>>CBFalconer <cbfalconer@yah oo.comwrote:

>[...]

>>>Please snip signatures.

>[...]

>>...not something _you_ should be telling him.

>>
>Why not? Sure, Chuck's signature is too long, and it happens to have
>an embedded "-- "; that has no bearing on whether signatures should be
>snipped when posting followups.

>
>It's called "hypocrisy" , Keith. Chuck is telling people to observe
>netiquette conventions, even though his signature block violates those
>same conventions.

And here I find myself (gasp!) agreeing with Heathfield.
Will wonders never cease.

P.S. I just *love* it when the two main CLC chicks (KT,RH) fight.

[Richard]

Re: Dev-C++ compiling problem

gazelle@xmissio n.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) writes:

In article <_-ednSJFLcaR-4XaRVnyvwA@bt.c om>,
Richard Heathfield <rjh@see.sig.in validwrote:

>>Keith Thompson said:
>>

>>rlb@hoekstra-uitgeverij.nl (Richard Bos) writes:
>>>CBFalconer <cbfalconer@yah oo.comwrote:
>>[...]
>>>>Please snip signatures.
>>[...]
>>>...not something _you_ should be telling him.
>>>
>>Why not? Sure, Chuck's signature is too long, and it happens to have
>>an embedded "-- "; that has no bearing on whether signatures should be
>>snipped when posting followups.

>>
>>It's called "hypocrisy" , Keith. Chuck is telling people to observe
>>netiquette conventions, even though his signature block violates those
>>same conventions.

>
And here I find myself (gasp!) agreeing with Heathfield.
Will wonders never cease.

Actually I agree with RH a lot. It's just the prissy "off topic" garbage
which gets my goat. Give him his due, he knows his C better than most.

[Kenny McCormack]

Re: Dev-C++ compiling problem

In article <k6lmu4-csb.ln1@news.in dividual.net>,
Richard <rgrdev@gmail.c omwrote:
....

>And here I find myself (gasp!) agreeing with Heathfield.
>Will wonders never cease.

>
>Actually I agree with RH a lot. It's just the prissy "off topic" garbage
>which gets my goat. Give him his due, he knows his C better than most.

Well, that, and the incessant Navia-bashing, from which he obviously
derives great psychic pleasure.

Now, mind you, I'm not really a Navia fan/supporter - he reminds me of
nothing so much as the proverbial guy walking around with a "Kick Me!"
sign on his back. But still, I find Heathfield's (and his sock puppets')
attacks pretty juvenile.

[Peter Pichler]

Re: Dev-C++ compiling problem

Richard Bos wrote:

CBFalconer <cbfalconer@yah oo.comwrote:
>

>>Please snip signatures.

>
That is...
>

>>--
>Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
> Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems.
> <http://cbfalconer.home .att.net>
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

>
...not something _you_ should be telling him.

It may not be his fault. Have you actually read his sig?

[Peter Pichler]

Re: Dev-C++ compiling problem

Keith Thompson wrote:

Um, have you read the endless discussions about his sig?

<snip>

All this has been argued at tedious length by people who *have*
actually read his sig.

No, I have not followed the discussion. I meant to suggest that
such a discussion would be pointless, but, as it seems, those
participating in it already know it. I'll get my coat. Sorry.