Dev-C++ compiling problem

[Kelsey Bjarnason]

Re: Dev-C++ compiling problem

[snips]

On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 06:56:05 +0000, Kenny McCormack wrote:

I see. Still, I'm a little surprised. While I personally don't think
riding on the sidewalk is a good idea, I would say that it is believed
by many that it is safer (particularly for children and other infirmed
types) and it is generally not discouraged.

Around here, it tends to be discouraged. Usual reasons apply: you're a
comparatively fast-moving, slow-reacting vehicle, travelling in close
proximity to many hidden doors and the like; a perfect place to mow down
unwary pedestrians, particularly kids.

Heck, most places I'm aware of tend to require most vehicular traffic -
cars, trucks, scooters, bikes, skateboards, etc, etc, etc, - stay on the
road.

Rationale seems to be it's okay if you want to risk your neck, not so much
if you want to risk other peoples' necks, and the folks in the cars are
somewhat less likely to get mangled by you running into them.

[Kelsey Bjarnason]

Re: Dev-C++ compiling problem

On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 00:55:30 +0000, Kenny McCormack wrote:

In article <AJ6dnQO-__D5urzanZ2dnUV Z8uadnZ2d@bt.co m>,
Richard Heathfield <rjh@see.sig.in validwrote:
...

>>Again, I don't do this. As it happens, I don't actually have a bicycle, but
>>if I did have one, I would not ride it on the pavement except where it is
>>permitted (e.g. a cycle track). I know from first-hand experience how
>>irritating and indeed dangerous pavement-using cyclists can be.

>
(This is not a troll - which is to say, this post is out-of-character
for me)

Whereas you're admitting your usual posts - the ones in character - *are*
in fact trolls.

As if this wasn't sufficiently clear already.

[Richard]

Re: Dev-C++ compiling problem

Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gma il.comwrites:

[snips]
>
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 06:56:05 +0000, Kenny McCormack wrote:
>

>I see. Still, I'm a little surprised. While I personally don't think
>riding on the sidewalk is a good idea, I would say that it is believed
>by many that it is safer (particularly for children and other infirmed
>types) and it is generally not discouraged.

>
Around here, it tends to be discouraged. Usual reasons apply: you're a
comparatively fast-moving, slow-reacting vehicle, travelling in close
proximity to many hidden doors and the like; a perfect place to mow down
unwary pedestrians, particularly kids.
>
Heck, most places I'm aware of tend to require most vehicular traffic -
cars, trucks, scooters, bikes, skateboards, etc, etc, etc, - stay on the
road.
>
Rationale seems to be it's okay if you want to risk your neck, not so much
if you want to risk other peoples' necks, and the folks in the cars are
somewhat less likely to get mangled by you running into them.

That being not the point of course. The big risk is cars running into
bikes.

All towns should have bike lanes on the paths as they do here in
Northern Germany. Pedestrians learn quick enough to stay away from the
parallel lines.

[Flash Gordon]

Re: Dev-C++ compiling problem

Mark McIntyre wrote, On 25/10/07 22:20:

On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 22:56:55 +0000, in comp.lang.c , Richard
Heathfield <rjh@see.sig.in validwrote:
>

>Mark McIntyre said:
>>

>>On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 14:51:49 +0000, in comp.lang.c , Richard
>>Heathfield <rjh@see.sig.in validwrote:

<snip>

>>Perhaps you would, perhaps you wouldn't. Would you break a 12-month
>>contract?

>No, I'd find a different news service.

>
Even if it cost you several hundred quid?

Chuck has been pointed at and offered one that would cost him exactly
nothing.

>>What if it was tied to a deal for cheap webhosting?

>I do my own webhosting. Kind of hard to beat free.

>
I'll just point out here that you have deliberately ignored the
question - presumably because you have no answer.

I doubt that anything is provided on the condition that he use the news
server. It might be provided as part of a package, but that would not
prevent him from using a different free alternative for Usenet access.

>>What if your ISP blocked port 119 except for this particular service?

>In that case I'd find a different ISP.

>
And lost your email / webhost / 12 months contract / tied voip deal ?

Well, I can run my news server on any port I choose and I have offered
access to it.

Richard, you frequently tell JN not to keep digging - why not take
your own advice?

Personally I wish that people would stop arguing about Chuck's
signature. Either killfile him or don't argue about it. I also wish he
would change to something else, but I don't think it is worth the level
of argument it gets.
--
Flash Gordon

[Keith Thompson]

Re: Dev-C++ compiling problem

Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gma il.comwrites:

On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 00:55:30 +0000, Kenny McCormack wrote:

[snip]

Whereas you're admitting your usual posts - the ones in character - *are*
in fact trolls.
>
As if this wasn't sufficiently clear already.

KM has always been a self-proclaimed troll. Please don't feed him.

--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keit h) kst-u@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
San Diego Supercomputer Center <* <http://users.sdsc.edu/~kst>
"We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this."
-- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"

[Kenny McCormack]

Re: Dev-C++ compiling problem

In article <otsev4-bu1.ln1@spanky. localhost.net>,
Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gma il.comwrote:

>On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 00:55:30 +0000, Kenny McCormack wrote:
>

>In article <AJ6dnQO-__D5urzanZ2dnUV Z8uadnZ2d@bt.co m>,
>Richard Heathfield <rjh@see.sig.in validwrote:
>...

>>>Again, I don't do this. As it happens, I don't actually have a bicycle, but
>>>if I did have one, I would not ride it on the pavement except where it is
>>>permitted (e.g. a cycle track). I know from first-hand experience how
>>>irritating and indeed dangerous pavement-using cyclists can be.

>>
>(This is not a troll - which is to say, this post is out-of-character
>for me)

>
>Whereas you're admitting your usual posts - the ones in character - *are*
>in fact trolls.
>
>As if this wasn't sufficiently clear already.

Your grasp of the obvious is underwhelming. Good show, old boy!

[David Thompson]

Re: Dev-C++ compiling problem

On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:44:02 -0700, Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org>
wrote:

CBFalconer <cbfalconer@yah oo.comwrites:

Frankly I consider all this fuss ridiculous. A one line added sig
by the news-server is not causing serious problems for anyone.

<snip example>

It's adding *six* lines. After your own signature, there are three
blank lines, the "-- " delimiter, the "Posted via ..." message, and
another blank line.
>
I'm assuming the three blank lines aren't part of your own signature.
If they are, I suggest you remove them. Removing the trailing
new-line at the end of the last line of your own signature (if you can
do so) might also help. (If you could fool teranews into putting the
"-- " on the end of the last line of your own signature, that would
probably silence most objections.)
>

I very much doubt he could do that last. <ObSlightlyTopi cC makes it
implementation-defined whether a 'partial' last line (no newline) is
supported but </NNTP only supports complete lines. Ditto vanilla
SMTP. With mail-MIME _some_ encodings of (text) content-types can have
partial last line, but going news-MIME to solve this tiny problem is
like chopping your head off to solve a slight headache.

- formerly david.thompson1 || achar(64) || worldnet.att.ne t