IIS

[Mr. Arnold]

Re: IIS


"rowe_newsgroup s" <rowe_email@yah oo.comwrote in message <>

<snipped>

I'll book you on Jerry Springer, because that's where you belong. You can
display your mental issues to the world, because don't kid yourself, you do
have some mental issues you need taken care of so that you can function.
Personally, I think you need to be locked-up. If you think I am going to
kiss your behind, you got another thing coming.

[rowe_newsgroups]

Re: IIS

Someone what to tell me how that one statement above that I made about using

IIS on XP Pro is doing the right thing (IMO) has somehow lead to me
misquoting this person?

Perhaps I misunderstood you earlier - so here is your chance to
clarify:

Did you not mean that by me stating that is was needless and foolish
to upgrade to XP Pro to test web applications it was morally/legally
wrong? And also didn't this imply that I was one of the advocates of
hacking XP Home to run IIS? This is what I took from your statements,
and this is why I asked for an apology.

I don't know what's wrong with this person, and personally (IMHO) this
person needs to be locked up.

FYI - posted "(IMHO)" before a libelous statement does not make it any
more libelous. Would you now like to drop the childlike antics and
talk about this like an adult?

I am doing what I can to handle this in a professional manner - please
drop the name calling and simply answer my above question about what
you meant by your previous statements. If I misunderstood your intents
I will apologize, and if you misunderstood my intents the professional
thing for you to do would be to apologize.

Thanks,

Seth Rowe

[Mr. Arnold]

Re: IIS


"rowe_newsgroup s" <rowe_email@yah oo.comwrote in message

<snipped>

>
I am doing what I can to handle this in a professional manner - please
drop the name calling and simply answer my above question about what
you meant by your previous statements. If I misunderstood your intents
I will apologize, and if you misunderstood my intents the professional
thing for you to do would be to apologize.
>

You had no business coming into my face to begin with, period. You needed to
post to the OP, and mind your own business like I was mining my own
business. But you couldn't do that could you? You had to lip service me on
something that I absolutely could care less about it.

I don't have to explain *anything* to you, master. I am not here to hold
your hand , satisfy you or cater to your needs. That's the job of your
family, and I doubt that they even do that.

I thought I made it kind of clear in my posts that I didn't want to be
bothered with you, but you choose to ignore it.

The only thing you can do at this point and in the future is just stay out
of my face, because I'll put it to you bluntly again, *you* *don't* *mean*
*anything* *to* *me*. I could care less about what you're talking about.

I am here for the OP that needs help, if I can help the OP. I am not here
for you.

I can't make it any plainer to you than that.

[rowe_newsgroups]

Re: IIS

On Sep 4, 7:32 am, "Mr. Arnold" <MR. Arn...@Arnold.c omwrote:

"rowe_newsgroup s" <rowe_em...@yah oo.comwrote in message
>
<snipped>
>
>
>

I am doing what I can to handle this in a professional manner - please
drop the name calling and simply answer my above question about what
you meant by your previous statements. If I misunderstood your intents
I will apologize, and if you misunderstood my intents the professional
thing for you to do would be to apologize.

>
You had no business coming into my face to begin with, period. You needed to
post to the OP, and mind your own business like I was mining my own
business. But you couldn't do that could you? You had to lip service me on
something that I absolutely could care less about it.
>
I don't have to explain *anything* to you, master. I am not here to hold
your hand , satisfy you or cater to your needs. That's the job of your
family, and I doubt that they even do that.
>
I thought I made it kind of clear in my posts that I didn't want to be
bothered with you, but you choose to ignore it.
>
The only thing you can do at this point and in the future is just stay out
of my face, because I'll put it to you bluntly again, *you* *don't* *mean*
*anything* *to* *me*. I could care less about what you're talking about.
>
I am here for the OP that needs help, if I can help the OP. I am not here
for you.
>
I can't make it any plainer to you than that.

Sigh, I can see you are not a professional and continuing this
conversation will be as futile as continuing one with Aaron Kempf. I
hope the readers of this post at least see my attempts to resolve a
situation and your complete disregard for all professional conduct.

Now to let this thread die...

Thanks,

Seth Rowe

[Mr. Arnold]

Re: IIS


"rowe_newsgroup s" <rowe_email@yah oo.comwrote in message
news:1188910655 .630237.133430@ o80g2000hse.goo glegroups.com.. .

On Sep 4, 7:32 am, "Mr. Arnold" <MR. Arn...@Arnold.c omwrote:

>"rowe_newsgrou ps" <rowe_em...@yah oo.comwrote in message
>>
><snipped>
>>
>>
>>

I am doing what I can to handle this in a professional manner - please
drop the name calling and simply answer my above question about what
you meant by your previous statements. If I misunderstood your intents
I will apologize, and if you misunderstood my intents the professional
thing for you to do would be to apologize.

>>
>You had no business coming into my face to begin with, period. You needed
>to
>post to the OP, and mind your own business like I was mining my own
>business. But you couldn't do that could you? You had to lip service me
>on
>something that I absolutely could care less about it.
>>
>I don't have to explain *anything* to you, master. I am not here to hold
>your hand , satisfy you or cater to your needs. That's the job of your
>family, and I doubt that they even do that.
>>
>I thought I made it kind of clear in my posts that I didn't want to be
>bothered with you, but you choose to ignore it.
>>
>The only thing you can do at this point and in the future is just stay
>out
>of my face, because I'll put it to you bluntly again, *you* *don't*
>*mean*
>*anything* *to* *me*. I could care less about what you're talking about.
>>
>I am here for the OP that needs help, if I can help the OP. I am not here
>for you.
>>
>I can't make it any plainer to you than that.

>
Sigh, I can see you are not a professional and continuing this
conversation will be as futile as continuing one with Aaron Kempf. I
hope the readers of this post at least see my attempts to resolve a
situation and your complete disregard for all professional conduct.
>
Now to let this thread die...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional

You and this NG are not putting one penny in my pockets. If there was some
money on the line and I was getting *paid*, then things I would be
different.

You act like I know who Aaron Kempf is. I don't know who he is, and I don't
want to know who you are either. And I haven't read your posts in the past
nor will I be reading them in future.

I am not here to debate or discuss anything with the *regulars*. I am here
only for the OP that needs help, otherwise, someone like you shows with the
need to start running your mouth.

Hasta la vista -- baby!

[Mr. Arnold]

Re: IIS


"jeff" <jhersey at allnorth dottt comwrote in message

<snipped>

I don't think I did attack the poster. I just didn't want hear what he had
to say. which he didn't seem to understand nor do you it seems.

You have your opinions on things, and I have my opinions on things. Opinions
are a dime a dozen, and everyone has got one. There is no debate about this,
and I don't want to hear what you have to say about it. He, you and the OP
can do whatever you want with your machines, because after all, they are
your machines. I could care less about it.

I'll tell anyone who is doing Web development with no exceptions. One uses a
workstation O/S that supports a Web Server such as Win 2k Pro, XP Pro and
Vista, and I don't care what VS 2005 has in it.

There is no maybe(s), black or white and in betweens with me concerning
this - none. That's my opinion and my take on things that I have applied to
IT since 1971. There would be no way some thing like XP Home Edition would
even be considered, and XP Pro should have been the O/S the OP should have
gotten right out of the gate.

[Rory Becker]

Re: IIS

"jeff" <jhersey at allnorth dottt comwrote in message

>
<snipped>
>
I don't think I did attack the poster. I just didn't want hear what he
had to say. Which he didn't seem to understand nor do you it seems.

"Mr Arnold" you say you don't think you attacked Seth. This is of course
good because, even if your posts came across badly, it means that you did
not intend them to. We are all guilty from time to time of rash decisions
and of jumping to conclusions.

However we now have a total of 3 people (Seth, jeff and myself) who think
Seth's position is a valid one. Save for myself (I'm sure there is time yet),
I would say you have been, at the very least, unpleasent to all of them.
These people are simply giving their opinion.

Seth's point was a direct counterpoint to your own and in the natural flow
of a conversation it made most sense that he reply to you rather than directly
to the OP. This is usually to help the flow of understanding from one post
to the next.

I'll tell anyone who is doing Web development with no exceptions. One
uses a workstation O/S that supports a Web Server such as Win 2k Pro,
XP Pro and Vista, and I don't care what VS 2005 has in it.
There is no maybe(s), black or white and in betweens with me
concerning this - none.

About whether this is your opinion or not, I agree - There can of course
be no debate.

About whether this is reasonable or not. Well... you have as I say, had 3
people suggest the opposite.

I hate to break it to you, but in the real world...

.... there are shades of grey
.... there are business concerns
.... there is opinion
.... there are exceptions

all with good reason.

Are you really saying that when confronted with an apparent choice between
option a and option b, you never look for an option c because "There is no
maybe(s), black or white and in betweens with me"

"I'll *tell* anyone", "One uses", "I don't care" - *If* this is truely the
case (but I suspect not) then don't be surprised if *most* ignore you.

The balance of probability suggests that the OP would care about "what VS
2005 has in it".

That's my opinion and my take on things that I
have applied to IT since 1971.

Again opinion should be flexible to new idea's. If your opinion had not changed
at all in all those years then it would be a miracle if you were still employed/in
business. Again I suspect that you are in fact more flexible than you let on.

There would be no way some thing like
XP Home Edition would even be considered, and XP Pro should have been
the O/S the OP should have gotten right out of the gate.

As indicated, the world is not Black and White.

Depends if the user had any say in the matter or even knew about the limitation
in the first place.
he might have been hopeing to turn a hobby into something more. Typically
people not based in the industry have very little need of XPPro and would
have to use the family PC (Very likely to have XPHome on it) for any experimental
programming that they might be doing.

--
Rory

[Mr. Arnold]

Re: IIS


"Rory Becker" <RoryBecker@new sgroup.nospamwr ote in message
<snipped>

I am not here to debate with anyone, nor do I want to hear about anyone's
opinions on something. My only concern is to the OP. I would prefer that
you and others just ignore me and not post to me, because. Life will go on,
the Sun will come up and it will be a new day.

None of this of which you talk about means anything to me. It's moot. I
don't care. I don't dance to anyone's tune out here on the Internet.

[Mr. Arnold]

Re: IIS


One other thing, when you and others come to the realization that I don't
want to be bothered with anything one may want to say to me trying to give
his or her take on things, and that I am NOT going to receptive of it, then
the better things are going to be a a whole.

[Rory Becker]

Re: IIS

One other thing, when you and others come to the realization that I

don't want to be bothered with anything one may want to say to me
trying to give his or her take on things, and that I am NOT going to
receptive of it, then the better things are going to be a a whole.

Good luck with that.

I submit that the only way not to have people talk to you is to not be where
people are.

If you don't like the way the world works, don't go out into it.

--
Rory

[Mr. Arnold]

Re: IIS


"Rory Becker" <RoryBecker@new sgroup.nospamwr ote in message
news:b0ac48a01a bd08c9bd699b594 0c0@msnews.micr osoft.com...

>One other thing, when you and others come to the realization that I
>don't want to be bothered with anything one may want to say to me
>trying to give his or her take on things, and that I am NOT going to
>receptive of it, then the better things are going to be a a whole.

>
Good luck with that.
>
I submit that the only way not to have people talk to you is to not be
where people are.
>
If you don't like the way the world works, don't go out into it.

The other thing is just to killfile you, so that I won't see you again. And
that's what is going to happen now -- good bye. :)