Re: where is the new access 2007 newsgroup?
gee anthony.. you're just about informed enough to be an Acces MVP
I mean; you're oblivious to new features in Access..
just like all the dipshit Access MVPs around here
if MS nominated a SINGLE Access MVP that knew jack shit about SQL
Server then maybe they wouldn't have such a marketing problem.
As it is; MVP means that 'you're a fucking wuss who won't stand up for
microsoft'
MVP means that you're soft and unaccomplished and lame and loose
-Aaron
Anthony wrote:
gee anthony.. you're just about informed enough to be an Acces MVP
I mean; you're oblivious to new features in Access..
just like all the dipshit Access MVPs around here
if MS nominated a SINGLE Access MVP that knew jack shit about SQL
Server then maybe they wouldn't have such a marketing problem.
As it is; MVP means that 'you're a fucking wuss who won't stand up for
microsoft'
MVP means that you're soft and unaccomplished and lame and loose
-Aaron
Anthony wrote:
There's no such thing as "Access 2007".
>
Access 95
Access 97
Access 2000
Access 2002
Access XP
Access 2003
>
"Homer J Simpson" <nobody@nowhere .comwrote in message
news:5pgeh.4216 4$rv4.21258@edt nps90...
"mg" <bitspam@gmail. comwrote in message
news:1165568748 .613255.26590@n 67g2000cwd.goog legroups.com...
Don't repost the post - most everyone has plonked this idiot.
>
Access 95
Access 97
Access 2000
Access 2002
Access XP
Access 2003
>
"Homer J Simpson" <nobody@nowhere .comwrote in message
news:5pgeh.4216 4$rv4.21258@edt nps90...
"mg" <bitspam@gmail. comwrote in message
news:1165568748 .613255.26590@n 67g2000cwd.goog legroups.com...
>
Could you BE any more irrelevant?
Could you BE any more irrelevant?
Comment