which browsers fully adopt CSS2 (and thus CSS1)?
zach
zach
-
-
Re: browser compliance?
in comp.infosystem s.www.authoring.stylesheets, Zach wrote:[color=blue]
> which browsers fully adopt CSS2 (and thus CSS1)?[/color]
None. Never will.
--
Lauri Raittila <http://www.iki.fi/lr> <http://www.iki.fi/zwak/fonts>
Utrecht, NL.
-
Re: browser compliance?
"Zach" <netrek@gmail.c om> wrote:
[color=blue]
>which browsers fully adopt CSS2 (and thus CSS1)?[/color]
None.
Some have come close with CSS 2.1 (which actually contains less than
2.0) - Opera is closest, Gecko not far behind. IE supports most of CSS
1 but really not a lot of CSS 2.1
Steve
--
"My theories appal you, my heresies outrage you,
I never answer letters and you don't like my tie." - The Doctor
Steve Pugh <steve@pugh.net > <http://steve.pugh.net/>
Comment
-
Re: browser compliance?
hallo lauri,
ah such a pity, why can't W3C force all browsers to be fully compliant?
zach
Comment
-
Re: browser compliance?
how good does Firefox support CSS2?
zach
Comment
-
Re: browser compliance?
[Reconstructing the context...]
Zach <netrek@gmail.c om> wrote:[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
>>> which browsers fully adopt CSS2 (and thus CSS1)?[/color][/color][/color]
Lauri Raittila <lauri@raittila .cjb.net> wrote:[color=blue][color=green]
>> None. Never will.[/color][/color]
Zach <netrek@gmail.c om> wrote:[color=blue]
> ah such a pity, why can't W3C force all browsers to be fully compliant?[/color]
Because "force" doesn't work on the WWW? Oh, wait, that's a different
debate.
--
Darin McGrew, mcgrew@stanford alumni.org, http://www.rahul.net/mcgrew/
Web Design Group, darin@htmlhelp. com, http://www.HTMLHelp.com/
"Advice is what you ask for when you know the answer but wish you didn't."
Comment
-
Re: browser compliance?
heh. hey rahul is cool dude, i see him on #emacs on freenode
zach
Comment
-
[OT] Re: browser compliance?
/Zach/:
[color=blue]
> heh. hey rahul is cool dude, i see him on #emacs on freenode[/color]
Hey, Zach, could you stop that insanity of yours!? You've already
been pointed - this is not a chat channel. Search for FAQs on
guidelines for posting to newsgroups. Please, don't reply on that
one to the newsgroup. If you want to reply - email me (my email
address is real, although I won't bother to answer you, most probably).
--
Stanimir
Comment
-
Re: browser compliance?
On 16 Feb 2005 14:12:24 -0800, "Zach" <netrek@gmail.c om> wrote:
[color=blue]
>which browsers fully adopt CSS2 (and thus CSS1)?[/color]
None.
--
Rex
Comment
-
Re: browser compliance?
On 16 Feb 2005 15:03:41 -0800, "Zach" <netrek@gmail.c om> wrote:
[color=blue]
>why can't W3C force all browsers to be fully compliant?[/color]
Put that question forward to Bill Gates.
--
Rex
Comment
-
Re: browser compliance?
I don't think it's too good at some things, don't remember what. But css
pages I've done in IE didn't look the same in Firefox, mainly boxes that
mattered a lot, so I quit my Foxfire experiments.
"Zach" <netrek@gmail.c om> wrote in message
news:1108595050 .172548.132230@ l41g2000cwc.goo glegroups.com.. .[color=blue]
> how good does Firefox support CSS2?
>
> zach
>[/color]
Comment
-
Re: browser compliance?
Patrick wrote:
[top-posting corrected]
[color=blue]
> "Zach" <netrek@gmail.c om> wrote in message
> news:1108595050 .172548.132230@ l41g2000cwc.goo glegroups.com.. .
>[color=green]
>> how good does Firefox support CSS2?[/color][/color]
[color=blue]
> I don't think it's too good at some things, don't remember what.[/color]
It's very good at almost everything.
[color=blue]
> But css pages I've done in IE didn't look the same in Firefox,
> mainly boxes that mattered a lot, so I quit my Foxfire experiments.[/color]
You do remember that IE is quite broken when it comes to "boxes" and
similar stuff. I would wager that Firefox was correct and IE was
wrong. You need to think "design for Firefox and fix quirks for IE."
--
-bts
-This space intentionally left blank.
Comment
-
Re: browser compliance?
"Zach" <netrek@gmail.c om> wrote:
[color=blue]
>how good does Firefox support CSS2?[/color]
I already told you:[color=blue][color=green]
>> Some have come close with CSS 2.1 (which actually contains less than
>> 2.0) - Opera is closest, Gecko not far behind.[/color][/color]
Gecko (which is the rendering engine used by Mozilla, Firefox, Camino,
Netscape, etc.) supports most of CSS 2.1 but there are a few bits it
doesn't support and there's also all the stuff that's in 2.0 but not
in 2.1 that it doesn't support.
Steve
--
"My theories appal you, my heresies outrage you,
I never answer letters and you don't like my tie." - The Doctor
Steve Pugh <steve@pugh.net > <http://steve.pugh.net/>
Comment
-
Re: browser compliance?
"Zach" <netrek@gmail.c om> wrote:
[color=blue]
>ah such a pity, why can't W3C force all browsers to be fully compliant?[/color]
"If you don't make your browser compliant we're not going to let you
attend any meetings" ?
"If you don't make your browser compliant we're going to refuse your
membership fee" ?
What could the W3C do to force the browser manufacturers?
Steve
--
"My theories appal you, my heresies outrage you,
I never answer letters and you don't like my tie." - The Doctor
Steve Pugh <steve@pugh.net > <http://steve.pugh.net/>
Comment
-
Re: browser compliance?
"Zach" <netrek@gmail.c om> writes:
[color=blue]
> hallo lauri,
>
> ah such a pity, why can't W3C force all browsers to be
> fully compliant?[/color]
It has no Special Forces. Perhaps it should?
--
Jón Fairbairn Jon.Fairbairn@c l.cam.ac.uk
Comment
Comment