opacity

[Phillip Parr]

Re: opacity

[color=blue]
> This I understand, but firstly it was technically a css issue, as it was
> to
> do with css styles, the fact that I was using IE specific opacity is
> neither here nor there, I like to get code working in one browser before I
> make it work in others too.
> Secondly It'd be nice to be told the rules, rather than have them ranted
> at me like some nerdy 15 year old spot machine was trying to offend me!
>[/color]

Oh, and before you rant again, I'm sorry for the top post!
[color=blue]
>
> "Brian" <usenet3@juliet remblay.com.inv alid> wrote in message
> news:HvArd.1015 207$Gx4.234368@ bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldn et.att.net...[color=green]
>> Phillip Parr wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> "Spartanicu s" wrote ...
>>>
>>>> Top posting is not appreciated here, snipping quotes is. Corrected
>>>> this once.
>>>>
>>> You lot are pretty harsh to people who don't know your little set of
>>> 'rules'.[/color]
>>
>> That we are. You'd do well to learn those rules if you want help. If you
>> don't want help, then you needn't follow them.
>>
>> HTH.
>>
>> --
>> Brian (remove "invalid" to email me)[/color]
>
>[/color]

[Daniel Kirsch]

Re: opacity

Phillip Parr wrote:[color=blue]
> And why isn't it a css issue? It's part
> of the styles isn't it?[/color]

Yes, it's part of the styles. But that part does work. The dynamic
change is done with JavaScript and that's where the problem occured.

Daniel

[Phillip Parr]

Re: opacity

"Daniel Kirsch" <Iwillnotread_d aniel@gmx.de> wrote in message
news:comu7q$rtg $05$1@news.t-online.com...[color=blue]
> Phillip Parr wrote:[color=green]
>> And why isn't it a css issue? It's part of the styles isn't it?[/color]
>
> Yes, it's part of the styles. But that part does work. The dynamic change
> is done with JavaScript and that's where the problem occured.
>
> Daniel[/color]

Yes, but I didn't know that, I thought it may have been a general problem
with the css part of it, which is why I asked in both. :)

Phil

[Evertjan.]

Re: opacity

Phillip Parr wrote on 02 dec 2004 in comp.lang.javas cript:
[color=blue]
> Sorry, it's hard to not top post. I've been doing it with emails ..[/color]

This is NOT email, Philip, but usenet posting.
[color=blue]
> ...all my life, it's hard to suddenly change.[/color]

You must be very young.

Evertjan.

[Phillip Parr]

Re: opacity

"Evertjan." <exjxw.hannivoo rt@interxnl.net > wrote in message
news:Xns95B3A4A A6CFFeejj99@194 .109.133.29...[color=blue]
> Phillip Parr wrote on 02 dec 2004 in comp.lang.javas cript:
>[color=green]
>> Sorry, it's hard to not top post. I've been doing it with emails ..[/color]
>
> This is NOT email, Philip, but usenet posting.[/color]

Really? I'd never have guessed! And what i meant by emails were: my news
reader positions me at the top of a news post when i reply, the same as an
email does[color=blue]
>[color=green]
>> ...all my life, it's hard to suddenly change.[/color]
>
> You must be very young.[/color]

I am, I'm only 22. email has been around since the 70's, so what can I say?
[color=blue]
>
> Evertjan.[/color]

[Evertjan.]

Re: opacity

Phillip Parr wrote on 02 dec 2004 in comp.lang.javas cript:[color=blue][color=green]
>> This is NOT email, Philip, but usenet posting.[/color]
>
> Really? I'd never have guessed![/color]

A good thing I told you, ain't it?
[color=blue]
> And what i meant by emails were: my news reader
> positions me at the top of a news post when i reply, the
> same as an email does[/color]

That is a strange way to define the word "email".

Evertjan.

[Martin Bialasinski]

Re: opacity

"Phillip Parr" <no@no.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
> Really? I'd never have guessed! And what i meant by emails were: my news
> reader positions me at the top of a news post when i reply, the same as an
> email does[/color]

So that you can remove irrelevant parts and reply directly below the
respective relevant statement as you move down the posting you are
answering to. As with emails. Actually quite useful, isn't it?

Bye,
Martin

[Phillip Parr]

Re: opacity

> Bye,[color=blue]
> Martin[/color]

Yes, I guess it is.

[G. Morgan]

Re: opacity

On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 23:00:04 +0000 (UTC) "Phillip Parr"
used 6 lines of text to write in newsgroup:
comp.infosystem s.www.authoring.stylesheets
[color=blue][color=green]
>> Bye,
>> Martin[/color]
>
>Yes, I guess it is.
>[/color]

You can fix MSOLE top-posting and quoting errors with this:

http://home.cs.tum.edu/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/

--
-Graham

Remove the 'snails' from my email

[Lauri Raittila]

Re: opacity

in comp.infosystem s.www.authoring.stylesheets, Phillip Parr wrote:[color=blue]
> Oh, and before you rant again, I'm sorry for the top post![/color]

Too late.

--
Lauri Raittila <http://www.iki.fi/lr> <http://www.iki.fi/zwak/fonts>

[Neal]

Re: opacity

G. Morgan wrote:
[color=blue]
> You can fix MSOLE top-posting and quoting errors with this:
> http://home.cs.tum.edu/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/[/color]

Yet be sure to snip the unneeded text - many users of Quotefix think all
the thinking's being done for them...

[G. Morgan]

Re: opacity

On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 18:48:18 -0500 "Neal"
used 7 lines of text to write in newsgroup:
comp.infosystem s.www.authoring.stylesheets
[color=blue]
>G. Morgan wrote:
>[color=green]
>> You can fix MSOLE top-posting and quoting errors with this:
>> http://home.cs.tum.edu/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/[/color]
>
>Yet be sure to snip the unneeded text - many users of Quotefix think all
>the thinking's being done for them...[/color]

lol. That's why they use MSOLE to begin with.




--
-Graham

Remove the 'snails' from my email

[Phillip Parr]

Re: opacity

> You can fix MSOLE top-posting and quoting errors with this:[color=blue]
> http://home.cs.tum.edu/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/
>[/color]

Now that's a good idea, thanks!