Validating against a higher standard

**Albert Wiersch** · Sep 13 '08, 10:55 PM

Re: Validating against a higher standard

"John Dunlop" <john@dunlop.na mewrote in message
news:74d4b047-b535-4d3c-992a-ed359120e762@f6 3g2000hsf.googl egroups.com...

>
Not anyone. I don't see any e-mail address in Lynx; I see only "image
of email address".
>
Does the "validator" not pick that up?

Did you not see the contact form? It's there and it works fine for me in
Lynx.

I hope this helps.

Albert Wiersch

**me@privacy.net** · Sep 14 '08, 05:15 AM

Re: Validating against a higher standard

"Albert Wiersch" <nospam@nospam. comwrote:

>"Ben C" <spamspam@spam. eggswrote in message

>On 2008-09-13, Albert Wiersch <nospam@nospam. comwrote:

"Lars Eighner" <usenet@larseig hner.comwrote in message
>the lovely and talented Albert Wiersch broadcast
>>
Actually, just trying to provide a USEFUL recommendation
>>
>No, you aren't. You are trying to sell your fraudulent junk.
>
Sorry, no. I don't might pointing out where a product (any
product, not just ours) might fit someone's needs

>>
>When have you ever pointed out a product that wasn't yours?

>
>http://www.htmlvalidator.com/htmlval/resources.html

When have you ever IN A NEWSGROUP POST pointed out a product
that wasn't yours?

**John Dunlop** · Sep 14 '08, 08:55 AM

Re: Validating against a higher standard

Albert Wiersch:

Did you not see the contact form? It's there and it works fine for me in
Lynx.

Yes, but if I use the contact form, I can't use my mail user-agent to
compose my e-mail or keep a copy of the e-mail I send.

--
Jock

**Stan Brown** · Sep 14 '08, 01:05 PM

Re: Validating against a higher standard

Sat, 13 Sep 2008 13:07:20 -0700 (PDT) from John Dunlop
<john@dunlop.na me>:

Albert Wiersch:
>

Your chosen definition of validator is not the only definition in the world.

>
"The question is" said Albert Wiersch, "which is to be master - that's
all".

And:

'When *I* use a word', said Albert Wiersch, 'it means what I choose
it to mean.'

--
Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Tompkins County, New York, USA

DRAGON222 | Pusat Resmi Sportsbook Digital Terunggul dengan Kans Terbaik

http://OakRoadSystems.com/

DRAGON222 menjadi pusat resmi terunggul Sportsbook Digital. Sistem cepat respon, tampilan sangat lancar anti lag, dan kemungkinan menang terjadi pada tekad kuat anda.

HTML 4.01 spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/
validator: http://validator.w3.org/
CSS 2.1 spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/
validator: http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/
Why We Won't Help You:

http://diveintomark.org/archives/2003/05/05/why_we_wont_help_you

**Albert Wiersch** · Sep 14 '08, 06:35 PM

Re: Validating against a higher standard

<me@privacy.net wrote in message
news:xeudnQzw2M oyBlHV4p2dnAA@g iganews.com...

>
When have you ever IN A NEWSGROUP POST pointed out a product
that wasn't yours?

First, this is a silly discussion. Second, I don't keep a record of every
newsgroup post I've made, but I have definitely recommended other products
whenever I thought it would be helpful and appropriate. I'm not going to
"entertain" this discussion any further. :-)

Albert

**Albert Wiersch** · Sep 14 '08, 06:45 PM

Re: Validating against a higher standard

"John Dunlop" <john@dunlop.na mewrote in message
news:339f5d64-fc36-4a94-a2ae-03d11831e7a6@d7 7g2000hsb.googl egroups.com...

>
Yes, but if I use the contact form, I can't use my mail user-agent to
compose my e-mail or keep a copy of the e-mail I send.

OK, I've changed the alt text to "support at htmlvalidator dot com". That
should be better while still providing me with some spam protection.

--
Albert Wiersch

**Adrienne Boswell** · Sep 14 '08, 10:35 PM

Re: Validating against a higher standard

Gazing into my crystal ball I observed "Albert Wiersch"
<nospam@nospam. comwriting in
news:zLczk.1021 79$6p1.9274@en-nntp-07.dc1.easynews .com:

>
><me@privacy.ne twrote in message
news:xeudnQzw2M oyBlHV4p2dnAA@g iganews.com...

>>
>When have you ever IN A NEWSGROUP POST pointed out a product
>that wasn't yours?

>
First, this is a silly discussion.

[http://www.davidpbrown.co.uk/jokes/m...n-parrot.html]

Second, I don't keep a record of
every newsgroup post I've made, but I have definitely recommended
other products whenever I thought it would be helpful and appropriate.
I'm not going to "entertain" this discussion any further. :-)
>

You don't have to keep a record of every newsgroup post - Google Groups
does that for you - and people like me can go look it up. Hmmm, let's
see, [http://groups.google.com/groups/sear...afe=off&num=50
&q=author%3A+al bert+wiersch&sa fe=off&qt_s=Sea rch&as_drrb=b&a s_mind=1
&as_minm=1&as_m iny=2004&as_max d=14&as_maxm=9& as_maxy=2008] or
[http://tinyurl.com/6z3rfs] - 57 messages with your name on them and
none of them recommend anything but this program.

--
Adrienne Boswell at Home
Arbpen Web Site Design Services

Arbpen Consulting

http://www.cavalcade-of-coding.info

Please respond to the group so others can share

**dorayme** · Sep 15 '08, 01:05 AM

Re: Validating against a higher standard

In article <Xns9B199DAB4F9 C6arbpenyahooco m@69.16.185.247 >,
Adrienne Boswell <arbpen@yahoo.c omwrote:

Gazing into my crystal ball I observed "Albert Wiersch"
<nospam@nospam. comwriting in
news:zLczk.1021 79$6p1.9274@en-nntp-07.dc1.easynews .com:
>

<me@privacy.net wrote in message
news:xeudnQzw2M oyBlHV4p2dnAA@g iganews.com...

>
When have you ever IN A NEWSGROUP POST pointed out a product
that wasn't yours?

First, this is a silly discussion.

[http://www.davidpbrown.co.uk/jokes/m...n-parrot.html]
>

Second, I don't keep a record of
every newsgroup post I've made, but I have definitely recommended
other products whenever I thought it would be helpful and appropriate.
I'm not going to "entertain" this discussion any further. :-)

>
You don't have to keep a record of every newsgroup post - Google Groups
does that for you - and people like me can go look it up.

How sure are you that your GG search gets all the posts by Albert? I
doubt if it is so perfect.

And it simply does not take into account many factors like he might have
posted under another name, No, not because he is dishonest or a
disgusting coward (like me) but maybe for a noble reason like that he
was being tracked by the Russians at some stage for working to keep
America safe from those commies and he had to go under cover for a short
while and while under there, he could not resist helping others with
advice about programs because of the softness of his heart...

--
dorayme

**Adrienne Boswell** · Sep 15 '08, 02:55 PM

Re: Validating against a higher standard

Gazing into my crystal ball I observed dorayme
<doraymeRidThis @optusnet.com.a uwriting in news:doraymeRid This-
FAB501.11003015 092008@web.aioe .org:

In article <Xns9B199DAB4F9 C6arbpenyahooco m@69.16.185.247 >,
Adrienne Boswell <arbpen@yahoo.c omwrote:
>

>Gazing into my crystal ball I observed "Albert Wiersch"
><nospam@nospam .comwriting in
>news:zLczk.102 179$6p1.9274@en-nntp-07.dc1.easynews .com:
>>

>
><me@privacy.ne twrote in message
news:xeudnQzw2M oyBlHV4p2dnAA@g iganews.com...
>>
>When have you ever IN A NEWSGROUP POST pointed out a product
>that wasn't yours?
>
First, this is a silly discussion.

>[http://www.davidpbrown.co.uk/jokes/m...n-parrot.html]
>>

Second, I don't keep a record of
every newsgroup post I've made, but I have definitely recommended
other products whenever I thought it would be helpful and

appropriate.

I'm not going to "entertain" this discussion any further. :-)
>

>>
>You don't have to keep a record of every newsgroup post - Google

Groups

>does that for you - and people like me can go look it up.

>
How sure are you that your GG search gets all the posts by Albert? I
doubt if it is so perfect.
>
And it simply does not take into account many factors like he might

have

posted under another name, No, not because he is dishonest or a
disgusting coward (like me) but maybe for a noble reason like that he
was being tracked by the Russians at some stage for working to keep
America safe from those commies and he had to go under cover for a

short

while and while under there, he could not resist helping others with
advice about programs because of the softness of his heart...
>

I love reading your posts in the morning, makes my day. Thank you.

--
Adrienne Boswell at Home
Arbpen Web Site Design Services

Arbpen Consulting

http://www.cavalcade-of-coding.info

Please respond to the group so others can share

**Albert Wiersch** · Sep 15 '08, 03:45 PM

Re: Validating against a higher standard

"dorayme" <doraymeRidThis @optusnet.com.a uwrote in message
news:doraymeRid This-FAB501.11003015 092008@web.aioe .org...

>
How sure are you that your GG search gets all the posts by Albert? I
doubt if it is so perfect.

Or maybe because I posted the recommendations on private newsservers, or
recommended them at other places like a website or forum forum... or in
person face to face...

Albert Wiersch

**Jonathan N. Little** · Sep 15 '08, 05:25 PM

Re: Validating against a higher standard

Albert Wiersch wrote:

"dorayme" <doraymeRidThis @optusnet.com.a uwrote in message
news:doraymeRid This-FAB501.11003015 092008@web.aioe .org...

>How sure are you that your GG search gets all the posts by Albert? I
>doubt if it is so perfect.

>
Or maybe because I posted the recommendations on private newsservers, or
recommended them at other places like a website or forum forum... or in
person face to face...
>
Albert Wiersch
>
>

Or maybe you mumble it in your sleep, it is really in material. Take it
for what it is, *your* product that *you're* selling, so your
"recommendation s" have a clear economic bias regardless of the products
merits. All should be aware of your bias and one could say your posts
are not more than SPAM

--
Take care,

Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO

Little Works Studio Site Maintainance

http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com

**Blinky the Shark** · Sep 15 '08, 06:45 PM

Re: Validating against a higher standard

Jonathan N. Little wrote:

Albert Wiersch wrote:

>"dorayme" <doraymeRidThis @optusnet.com.a uwrote in message
>news:doraymeRi dThis-FAB501.11003015 092008@web.aioe .org...

>>How sure are you that your GG search gets all the posts by Albert? I
>>doubt if it is so perfect.

>>
>Or maybe because I posted the recommendations on private newsservers, or
>recommended them at other places like a website or forum forum... or in
>person face to face...
>>
>Albert Wiersch
>>
>>

>
Or maybe you mumble it in your sleep, it is really in material.

immaterial?

--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org
Need a new news feed? http://blinkynet.net/comp/newfeed.html

**Albert Wiersch** · Sep 15 '08, 09:15 PM

Re: Validating against a higher standard

"Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@centra l.netwrote in message
news:80935$48ce 98c6$40cba7c6$2 0458@NAXS.COM.. .

>
Or maybe you mumble it in your sleep, it is really in material.

Yes, it is a silly discussion.

Take it for what it is, *your* product that *you're* selling, so your
"recommendation s" have a clear economic bias regardless of the products
merits.

Which is why I have no problem with people trying out CSE HTML Validator for
themselves and making their own decisions as to whether CSE HTML Validator
is useful to them. They don't have to "take my word on it". I welcome and
invite everyone to try out the program before they buy it and make their own
decisions based on how useful it is to them, and not solely on what I say
about it. I am simply bringing to people's attention that CSE HTML Validator
exists and is there for anyone who wants to check it out for themselves.

If I was looking for a solution to a problem, then I'd welcome anyone's
suggestion and then I would do further research on the suggestions to
evaluate what was my best option.

Albert Wiersch

**Jonathan N. Little** · Sep 15 '08, 09:15 PM

Re: Validating against a higher standard

Blinky the Shark wrote:

Jonathan N. Little wrote:
>

>Albert Wiersch wrote:

>>"dorayme" <doraymeRidThis @optusnet.com.a uwrote in message
>>news:doraymeR idThis-FAB501.11003015 092008@web.aioe .org...
>>>How sure are you that your GG search gets all the posts by Albert? I
>>>doubt if it is so perfect.
>>Or maybe because I posted the recommendations on private newsservers, or
>>recommended them at other places like a website or forum forum... or in
>>person face to face...
>>>
>>Albert Wiersch
>>>
>>>

>Or maybe you mumble it in your sleep, it is really in material.

>
immaterial?
>
>

Yes fat-fingered again....Thank Blink but I am sure the message will
still not be received.

--
Take care,

Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO

Little Works Studio Site Maintainance

http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com

**Jukka K. Korpela** · Sep 15 '08, 09:25 PM

Re: Validating against a higher standard

Albert Wiersch wrote:

If I was looking for a solution to a problem, then I'd welcome
anyone's suggestion

Sounds very unproductive, since that includes listening to the suggestions
of people who are quite ignorant of the issue at hand. It seems that you
would buy the snake oil you are selling, or you pretend you would.

--
Yucca, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/

Validating against a higher standard

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment