Re: Colspan - rowspan HTML Table
Brian wrote:
[color=blue]
> SM wrote:[/color]
[color=blue]
> This is getting silly. Do you believe that _The NY Times_ is widely read
> because of its attractive visuals? Or do you suppose that perhaps people
> regard it as trustworthy.[1][/color]
I didn't say that. What I'm saying, the most are trying hard to look
attractive. Look how much paint ladies are using.
And it works!
Of course you'll go for a news to NYT and not for a beauty.
:)
[color=blue]
> Read: "I have not a shred of evidence, but if I repeat it, it'll seem
> convincing."[/color]
Exactly. The best example is a... toilet paper!
Has the only purpose. Not a very noble one, but is essential to have it.
And they are employing a graphic designers to make damn thing look great!
When I'm looking for tutorial on css or html, I'm not expecting beauty,
but a well organized pages with great contents.
[color=blue]
> [1] I'm not arguing that _The NY Times_ *is* trustworthy, but that
> discussion is best left to a media forum.[/color]
I think I know what you are trying to say here!
;-D
Will be better to leave the subject at the stage, that we have agreed to
disagree with each other on the subject of beauty of web pages.
Cheers...
Brian wrote:
[color=blue]
> SM wrote:[/color]
[color=blue]
> This is getting silly. Do you believe that _The NY Times_ is widely read
> because of its attractive visuals? Or do you suppose that perhaps people
> regard it as trustworthy.[1][/color]
I didn't say that. What I'm saying, the most are trying hard to look
attractive. Look how much paint ladies are using.
And it works!
Of course you'll go for a news to NYT and not for a beauty.
:)
[color=blue]
> Read: "I have not a shred of evidence, but if I repeat it, it'll seem
> convincing."[/color]
Exactly. The best example is a... toilet paper!
Has the only purpose. Not a very noble one, but is essential to have it.
And they are employing a graphic designers to make damn thing look great!
When I'm looking for tutorial on css or html, I'm not expecting beauty,
but a well organized pages with great contents.
[color=blue]
> [1] I'm not arguing that _The NY Times_ *is* trustworthy, but that
> discussion is best left to a media forum.[/color]
I think I know what you are trying to say here!
;-D
Will be better to leave the subject at the stage, that we have agreed to
disagree with each other on the subject of beauty of web pages.
Cheers...
Comment