Re: How to make footer at the bottom in 5 box 3 columns layout
On 2 Mar 2004 10:11:27 -0800, Peter Diedrich <pdiedrich@gmx. de> wrote:
[color=blue][color=green]
>> What you are talking about? Show me *one* site that produces a footer at
>> the bottom of each printed page.[/color]
>
> http://www.wired.com/animation/[/color]
That's a frameset.
[color=blue]
> ...plus thousands more. Stephen, tell us, which internet are you
> actually using? ;-)
>
>[color=green]
>> Yes - a footer at the bottom of each *web* page. Precisely. No problems
>> there.
>> But you were asking for a footer at the bottom of the *window* - weren't
>> you?[/color]
>
> Of course of every *web* page. Have I not posted to "authoring.html "?[/color]
See, here's the miscommunicatio n. The bottom of the webpage might not be
as far down as the bottom of the viewport. The "paper" might be as tall as
the viewport, shorter, or longer. Longer pages require us to scroll down.
Shorter pages have their bottom edge in the middle somewhere.
The reason it's so hard to adequately do what you ask is because unless
you have content that stretches it out, the page might not get to the
bottom edge.
Yes, other sites do this. It is done as a frameset or a table. It's my
opinion that either of those techniques will hurt you more than help you.
If you really have to do this, set up a frameset or do table layout.
But I don't see why it's such a crisis that a footer doesn't carry all the
way down. Don't you see, the pages aren't all the same size, even though
your viewport is the same size.
[color=blue]
> I am amazed how hardly someone can misunderstand what I want. I always
> thought, everybody would know what a footer is and where it has to be.
> I sincerely apologize for not being clear enough.
>
> Anybody out there who knows what a footer is and what I mean? Is it
> really THIS difficult?[/color]
1) Don't be rude, it will get you nowhere.
2) If I haven't gotten it here, and no one else has either, maybe the
fault lies not with everyone else but with you?
On 2 Mar 2004 10:11:27 -0800, Peter Diedrich <pdiedrich@gmx. de> wrote:
[color=blue][color=green]
>> What you are talking about? Show me *one* site that produces a footer at
>> the bottom of each printed page.[/color]
>
> http://www.wired.com/animation/[/color]
That's a frameset.
[color=blue]
> ...plus thousands more. Stephen, tell us, which internet are you
> actually using? ;-)
>
>[color=green]
>> Yes - a footer at the bottom of each *web* page. Precisely. No problems
>> there.
>> But you were asking for a footer at the bottom of the *window* - weren't
>> you?[/color]
>
> Of course of every *web* page. Have I not posted to "authoring.html "?[/color]
See, here's the miscommunicatio n. The bottom of the webpage might not be
as far down as the bottom of the viewport. The "paper" might be as tall as
the viewport, shorter, or longer. Longer pages require us to scroll down.
Shorter pages have their bottom edge in the middle somewhere.
The reason it's so hard to adequately do what you ask is because unless
you have content that stretches it out, the page might not get to the
bottom edge.
Yes, other sites do this. It is done as a frameset or a table. It's my
opinion that either of those techniques will hurt you more than help you.
If you really have to do this, set up a frameset or do table layout.
But I don't see why it's such a crisis that a footer doesn't carry all the
way down. Don't you see, the pages aren't all the same size, even though
your viewport is the same size.
[color=blue]
> I am amazed how hardly someone can misunderstand what I want. I always
> thought, everybody would know what a footer is and where it has to be.
> I sincerely apologize for not being clear enough.
>
> Anybody out there who knows what a footer is and what I mean? Is it
> really THIS difficult?[/color]
1) Don't be rude, it will get you nowhere.
2) If I haven't gotten it here, and no one else has either, maybe the
fault lies not with everyone else but with you?
Comment