Great, it works

[Charon]

Your method worked great for me, im also going to follow up on the
javascript version David left and compare.
Thanks guys.

[Brian]

Re: Great, it works

Charon wrote:[color=blue]
> Your method worked great for me, im also going to follow up on the
> javascript version David left and compare.[/color]

What works great? You started a new thread instead of replying in the
old one, and you quoted nothing from the original message. That
leaves us with no way to figure out what you're talking about.

--
Brian
follow the directions in my address to email me

[Charon]

Re: Great, it works

I realized that a little later,
Sorry about that just a miss click, I feel like a tool now.
You would be the one to notice as well :(

To clear things up


Previous thread:
Brian wrote:[color=blue]
> Charon wrote:
>[color=green]
>>While using the following to self link documents
>>
>><a href="#NAME"></a>
>>
>>Is there a way to dynamicaly bold, underline, or highlight the target[/color]
>
> Such a thing is possible using css 3's :target pseudo-class. Using
> your html example above, place the following in your styles:
>
> a#name:target {
> font-weight: bold;
> }[/color]

oops. That's bogus. The above css declaration would work with an id,
but not the a href="name" contruct given. Sorry. Try something like

<a href="foo.html" id="name">foo resource</a>

Here's a better example:

<h2 id="name">proje ct name</h2>

#name:target {
font-weight: bold;
}

better still:

<ul id="toc">
<li><a href="#name">pr oject name</a></li>
<li><a href="#goal">pr oject goals</a></li>
<li><a href="#timeline ">project timeline</a></li>
</ul>

<h2 id="name">proje ct name</h2>
<!-- content -->

<h2 id="goal">proje ct goals</h2>
<!-- content -->

<h2 id="timeline">p roject timeline</h2>
<!-- content -->



h2:target {
font-weight: bold;
}

--
Brian
follow the directions in my address to email me

"Brian" <usenet1@juliet remblay.com.inv alid-remove-this-part> wrote in
message news:diIvb.2082 66$ao4.743572@a ttbi_s51...[color=blue]
> Charon wrote:[color=green]
> > Your method worked great for me, im also going to follow up on the
> > javascript version David left and compare.[/color]
>
> What works great? You started a new thread instead of replying in the
> old one, and you quoted nothing from the original message. That
> leaves us with no way to figure out what you're talking about.
>
> --
> Brian
> follow the directions in my address to email me
>[/color]

[Stan Brown]

Re: Great, it works

In article <r4Nvb.460500$6 C4.113455@pd7tw 1no> in
comp.infosystem s.www.authoring.html, Charon
<eric.bauld@edu .sait.ab.ca> wrote:[color=blue]
>I realized that a little later,
>Sorry about that just a miss click, I feel like a tool now.
>You would be the one to notice as well :([/color]


makes it harder to follow discussions.
before the material you're commenting on, it
When you put your comments

--
Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Cortland County, New York, USA

http://OakRoadSystems.com/

HTML 4.01 spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/
validator: http://validator.w3.org/
CSS 2 spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/
2.1 changes: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/changes.html
validator: http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/