Refer to:
James Pickering
Pickering Pages
James Pickering
Pickering Pages
-
-
Re: Eolas suit may spark HTML changes?
JAMESICUS wrote:[color=blue]
> Refer to:
>
> http://news.com.com/2100-1023-5079580.html
>[/color]
Adios, mother of talking Flash ads.
-
Re: Eolas suit may spark HTML changes?
JAMESICUS pounced upon this pigeonhole and pronounced:[color=blue]
> Refer to:
>
> http://news.com.com/2100-1023-5079580.html
>[/color]
"Eolas founder and sole employee Mike Doyle said the W3C was right to take
a closer look at HTML with respect to his patent."
Does this mean the Mr. Doyle gets the entire $521 Million himself? <lol>
--
-bts
-This space intentionally left blank.
Comment
-
Re: Eolas suit may spark HTML changes?
Further information and W3C action:
James Pickering
Pickering Pages
Comment
-
Re: Eolas suit may spark HTML changes?
On 21 Sep 2003 01:26:09 GMT, jamesicus@aol.c om (JAMESICUS) wrote:
[color=blue]
>Refer to:
>
>http://news.com.com/2100-1023-5079580.html[/color]
You mean that authors might have to go back to a regular old <a
href=""> ... </a> to make a quicktime clip available to the user? The
horror,... the horror... ;-)
Nick
--
Nick Theodorakis
nicholas_theodo rakis@urmc.roch ester.edu
May cause drowsiness. Do not read while driving
or operating heavy machinery.
Comment
-
Re: Eolas suit may spark HTML changes?
Please excuse the cross-post, but it seemed to me the following links rightly
and appropriately belong in this thread for I perceive them to be germane to
this subject.
James Pickering
Pickering Pages
Comment
-
Re: Eolas suit may spark HTML changes?
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:[color=blue]
>[color=green]
>>http://news.com.com/2100-1023-5079580.html[/color]
>
> "Eolas founder and sole employee Mike Doyle said the W3C was right to take
> a closer look at HTML with respect to his patent."
>
> Does this mean the Mr. Doyle gets the entire $521 Million himself? <lol>[/color]
Sadly for him, no. UC gets 25%, Eolas gets 75% minus legal fees,
which they say will be used for "research projects."
--
Brian
follow the directions in my address to email me
Comment
-
Re: Eolas suit may spark HTML changes?
The developer of Viola says the judge prevented demonstrating Viola to
the jury and telling the jury that Doyle was informed about Viola prior
to the patent filing.
--
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen@iki.fi
Mozilla Web Author FAQ: http://mozilla.org/docs/web-developer/faq.html
Comment
-
Re: Eolas suit may spark HTML changes?
"JAMESICUS" <jamesicus@aol. com> wrote in message
news:2003092021 2609.10745.0000 1301@mb-m29.aol.com...[color=blue]
> Refer to:
>
> http://news.com.com/2100-1023-5079580.html[/color]
Personally, I feel that this patent should be invalidated
because it is too broad in its coverage. The patent office
in the U.S. needs to be dealt with harshly because of
the damage it is doing by giving out patents for many
things that are obvious and are sometimes the only
good way of doing certain things.
Comment
-
Re: Eolas suit may spark HTML changes?
"Henri Sivonen" <hsivonen@iki.f i> wrote in message
news:hsivonen-CAA6DA.18111721 092003@news.jip pii.fi...[color=blue]
> The developer of Viola says the judge prevented demonstrating Viola to
> the jury and telling the jury that Doyle was informed about Viola prior
> to the patent filing.
>
> http://www.xcf.berkeley.edu/~wei/vio...Microsoft.html[/color]
This clearly demonstrates bias by the judge in not allowing
highly relevant information to be presented to the jury.
If Microsoft does not win on appeal, it will further show just
how serious the flaws are in the U.S. judicial system.
Comment
-
Re: Eolas suit may spark HTML changes?
"Mark Jones" spam@block.com wrote:
[color=blue]
>If Microsoft does not win on appeal, it will further show just
>how serious the flaws are in the U.S. judicial system.[/color]
For the implications of a prolonged Appeal process delay, visit the the
following BBCi page:
James Pickering
Pickering Pages
Comment
-
Re: Eolas suit may spark HTML changes?
In article <20030921002211 .22634.00001345 @mb-m23.aol.com> in
comp.infosystem s.www.authoring.html, JAMESICUS <jamesicus@aol. com>
wrote:[color=blue]
>Newsgroups: comp.infosystem s.www.authoring.html
>
>Please excuse the cross-post,[/color]
What crosspost? Your article was posted to this group only.
If you mean you posted a SEPARATE COPY to one or more other groups,
that is _not_ crossposting but multiposting, and it's quite annoying
to your readers. Please see
<http://oakroadsystems. com/genl/unice.htm#xpost >.
--
Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Cortland County, New York, USA
HTML 4.01 spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/
validator: http://validator.w3.org/
CSS 2 spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/
2.1 changes: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/changes.html
validator: http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/
Comment
-
Re: Eolas suit may spark HTML changes?
JAMESICUS wrote:[color=blue]
> Refer to:
>
> http://news.com.com/2100-1023-5079580.html
>
>[/color]
If Microsoft doesn't ultimately win, then I don't see the harm of doing
things just like SSL:
[] Enable plug-ins to be embedded in web pages. If you live in the US,
you must have a license from Eolas.
XHTML 2 maybe should make an issue of this and specify that US browsers
only embed objects in formats that they can intrinsically handle. If
they can't handle it, then they should display the alternate content.
Comment
-
Re: Eolas suit may spark HTML changes?
Keith Bowes wrote:[color=blue]
> If you live in the
> US, you must have a license from Eolas.
>[/color]
live or browsing from?
--
William Tasso - http://WilliamTasso.com
Comment
Comment