Re: Is a Login Form "Tabula r Data"
Sanders Kaufman <bucky@kaufman. netwrote in
<_%6Bi.234$7P7. 189@newssvr19.n ews.prodigy.net >:
Actually, it's a *precisely* defined difference. RFC 2119.
Note that RFC 2119 is in Normative references section of
HTML 4.01 spec:
The Conformance section of the spec explicitly refers to it:
>>
>Definitely wrong.
>It may be bad practice, but it _doesn't_ violate any
>spec.
>
That depends on how your definition of "violate the spec".
Violation of the spec is *precisely* defined in Conformance
section of it. Get a clue already.
--
This chickenus crossed the roadus while yodelingus.
Sanders Kaufman <bucky@kaufman. netwrote in
<_%6Bi.234$7P7. 189@newssvr19.n ews.prodigy.net >:
Michael Fesser wrote:
>
Actually, it's a teeny tiny itsy bitsy difference, but I
get the point.
>That's a _recommendation _, nothing more. The important
>words here are "SHOULD NOT" - it's not a "MUST NOT".
>That's a big difference.
>words here are "SHOULD NOT" - it's not a "MUST NOT".
>That's a big difference.
Actually, it's a teeny tiny itsy bitsy difference, but I
get the point.
Note that RFC 2119 is in Normative references section of
HTML 4.01 spec:
The Conformance section of the spec explicitly refers to it:
>>- and
>>they violate the spec.
>>they violate the spec.
>Definitely wrong.
>It may be bad practice, but it _doesn't_ violate any
>spec.
That depends on how your definition of "violate the spec".
section of it. Get a clue already.
--
This chickenus crossed the roadus while yodelingus.
Comment