Standards for presentation of numerical data for usability and accessibility

[D.M. Procida]

I'm trying to find a guide for the formatting and presentation of
numbers in web pages, which will answer questions along the lines of
what if anything to use as separators in large figures, how to use
abbreviations for things like millions of dollars, and so on.

Thanks,

Daniele

[Followups set, please excuse the earlier message
alt.html.web-accessibility which didn't get cross-posted]

[Andreas Prilop]

Re: Standards for presentation of numerical data for usability andaccessibilit y

On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, D.M. Procida wrote:

Another example, this time for numbers in tables: I might want to make a
table of figures easier to parse by rounding the numbers and using
thousands or millions rather than units. So instead of "$13286723" , I
could use "$13.3m", or "13.3m" or "$13.3" or even just "13.3".

Most people would take "13.3m" or "13.3 m" as "13.3 metres".
Further, the symbol for "mega" is "M", meaning one million -
whereas the symbol for "milli" is "m", meaning one thousandth.

(What has this to do with authoring.html? )

[D.M. Procida]

Re: Standards for presentation of numerical data for usability and accessibility

Andreas Prilop <Prilop2007@tra shmail.netwrote :

Another example, this time for numbers in tables: I might want to make a
table of figures easier to parse by rounding the numbers and using
thousands or millions rather than units. So instead of "$13286723" , I
could use "$13.3m", or "13.3m" or "$13.3" or even just "13.3".

>
Most people would take "13.3m" or "13.3 m" as "13.3 metres".
Further, the symbol for "mega" is "M", meaning one million -
whereas the symbol for "milli" is "m", meaning one thousandth.

Well, exactly. There are a number of conventions surrounding how to
present such figures, and while this generally isn't a problem for users
of printed material, or users who can easily grasp the context and
convention from surrounding material, it still presents accessibility
and usability issues for others in the context of HTML.

(What has this to do with authoring.html? )

It's a question about HTML authoring.

Daniele

[David E. Ross]

Re: Standards for presentation of numerical data for usability andaccessibilit y

On 8/10/2007 4:49 AM, D.M. Procida wrote:

I'm trying to find a guide for the formatting and presentation of
numbers in web pages, which will answer questions along the lines of
what if anything to use as separators in large figures, how to use
abbreviations for things like millions of dollars, and so on.
>
Thanks,
>
Daniele
>
[Followups set, please excuse the earlier message
alt.html.web-accessibility which didn't get cross-posted]

Be sure your HTML indicates language, at the very beginning in your
!DOCTYPE. This is important because some languages use commas as
separators and periods as decimal points (e.g., English in the US and
UK) and some languages reverse this, using periods as separators and
commas as decimal points.

I would write out the numbers using numerals instead of words. This
serves two purposes.

First of all, in some countries (e.g., the US) "billion" means a
thousand million; in others, it means a million million. I think (not
sure) this UK is in the latter group. Thus, avoiding words avoids
confusion that cannot be resolved by specifying language.

The other purpose relates specifically to presenting a Web page. The
user can copy the numerals and paste them into a spreadsheet; otherwise,
the user must manually type them while adding zeros and shifting the
decimal point. (In my ten-year-old version of Excel, you can't use
Paste if there are separators; but you can use Paste Special as Text,
for which I created a macro button.)

Yes, I do think this was an appropriate question for this newsgroup.

--

David E. Ross
<http://www.rossde.com/>.

Don't ask "Why is there road rage?" Instead, ask
"Why NOT Road Rage?" or "Why Is There No Such
Thing as Fast Enough?"
<http://www.rossde.com/roadrage.html>

[Andreas Prilop]

Re: Standards for presentation of numerical data for usability andaccessibilit y

On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, David E. Ross wrote:

Be sure your HTML indicates language, at the very beginning in your
!DOCTYPE.

To be specific, this means <html lang="en".

http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/dirlang.html#h-8.1

[PDannyD]

Re: Standards for presentation of numerical data for usability and accessibility

David E. Ross wrote:

On 8/10/2007 4:49 AM, D.M. Procida wrote:

>I'm trying to find a guide for the formatting and presentation of
>numbers in web pages, which will answer questions along the lines of
>what if anything to use as separators in large figures, how to use
>abbreviation s for things like millions of dollars, and so on.
>>
>Thanks,
>>
>Daniele
>>
>[Followups set, please excuse the earlier message
>alt.html.web-accessibility which didn't get cross-posted]

>
Be sure your HTML indicates language, at the very beginning in your
!DOCTYPE. This is important because some languages use commas as
separators and periods as decimal points (e.g., English in the US and
UK) and some languages reverse this, using periods as separators and
commas as decimal points.
>
I would write out the numbers using numerals instead of words. This
serves two purposes.
>
First of all, in some countries (e.g., the US) "billion" means a
thousand million; in others, it means a million million. I think (not
sure) this UK is in the latter group.

In the UK a million used to be 1,000,000,000,0 00 but it is now almost
universally accepted to be 1,000,000,000

[Ben C]

Re: Standards for presentation of numerical data for usability and accessibility

On 2007-08-10, PDannyD <pdannyd@yahoo. co.ukwrote:

David E. Ross wrote:

[...]

>First of all, in some countries (e.g., the US) "billion" means a
>thousand million; in others, it means a million million. I think (not
>sure) this UK is in the latter group.

>
In the UK a million used to be 1,000,000,000,0 00

That was a billion. A million has always been 1e6. David E. Ross was
right.

but it is now almost universally accepted to be 1,000,000,000

Yes, even in the UK. An old-style billion is now often called a
"trillion".

[Dr J R Stockton]

Re: Standards for presentation of numerical data for usability and accessibility

In comp.infosystem s.www.authoring.html message
<1i2mrhr.17bkho e1ntjtsN%real-not-anti-spam-address@apple-juice.co.uk>,
Fri, 10 Aug 2007 12:49:25, D.M. Procida <real-not-anti-spam-
address@apple-juice.co.ukposted:

>I'm trying to find a guide for the formatting and presentation of
>numbers in web pages, which will answer questions along the lines of
>what if anything to use as separators in large figures, how to use
>abbreviation s for things like millions of dollars, and so on.

A decimal point should always have a digit on each side, except maybe in
tables where the format makes that unnecessary and impractical. It's
better not to have a number (in digits) at the beginning or end of a
sentence.

There is an international standard for representing currencies by
letters, probably ISO 4217 or successor.

--
(c) John Stockton, Surrey, UK. *@merlyn.demon. co.uk / ??.Stockton@phy sics.org
Web <URL:http://www.merlyn.demo n.co.uk/- FAQish topics, acronyms, & links.
Correct <= 4-line sig. separator as above, a line precisely "-- " (SoRFC1036)
Do not Mail News to me. Before a reply, quote with ">" or "" (SoRFC1036)

[Jukka K. Korpela]

Re: Standards for presentation of numerical data for usability and accessibility

Scripsit Dr J R Stockton:

A decimal point should always have a digit on each side, except maybe
in tables where the format makes that unnecessary and impractical.
It's better not to have a number (in digits) at the beginning or end
of a sentence.

There are many opinions, practices, and recommendations on such matters,
depending on language, authority, context, etc. And there is nothing
particularly HTML-related here.

There is an international standard for representing currencies by
letters, probably ISO 4217 or successor.

Or by numbers. Such codes have been defined for the purposes of
international banking business, internal data base representation, etc., not
for normal text. And there is nothing particularly HTML-related here.

--
Jukka K. Korpela ("Yucca")

http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/

[Dr J R Stockton]

Re: Standards for presentation of numerical data for usability and accessibility

In comp.infosystem s.www.authoring.html message <Xepvi.205746$3 96.144606@
reader1.news.sa unalahti.fi>, Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:46:47, Jukka K. Korpela
<jkorpela@cs.tu t.fiposted:

>Scripsit Dr J R Stockton:
>

>A decimal point should always have a digit on each side, except maybe
>in tables where the format makes that unnecessary and impractical.
>It's better not to have a number (in digits) at the beginning or end
>of a sentence.

>
>There are many opinions, practices, and recommendations on such
>matters, depending on language, authority, context, etc. And there is
>nothing particularly HTML-related here.

No; my intent was to be helpful to the OP, rather than to be
unnecessarily offensive. My first sentence there re-expresses something
which may, IIRC, be found in IUPAP/SUNAMCO, which is sufficiently
authoritative where it formally applies and an excellent guide wherever
the same reasoning applies. My second has no particular authority other
than my own; but IMHO will be preferred by any well-educated person.

>There is an international standard for representing currencies by
>letters, probably ISO 4217 or successor.

>
>Or by numbers. Such codes have been defined for the purposes of
>internationa l banking business, internal data base representation,
>etc., not for normal text.

The alphabetical code, while inappropriate for text intended to have
great literary appeal, can reasonably be used in paragraphs of a more
technical nature, and is certainly appropriate in relevant HTML tables.

--
(c) John Stockton, Surrey, UK. ?@merlyn.demon. co.uk Turnpike v6.05 IE 6
news:comp.lang. javascript FAQ <URL:http://www.jibbering.c om/faq/index.html>.
<URL:http://www.merlyn.demo n.co.uk/js-index.htmjscr maths, dates, sources.
<URL:http://www.merlyn.demo n.co.uk/TP/BP/Delphi/jscr/&c, FAQ items, links.

[PDannyD]

Re: Standards for presentation of numerical data for usability and accessibility

PDannyD wrote:

David E. Ross wrote:
>

>On 8/10/2007 4:49 AM, D.M. Procida wrote:

>>I'm trying to find a guide for the formatting and presentation of
>>numbers in web pages, which will answer questions along the lines of
>>what if anything to use as separators in large figures, how to use
>>abbreviatio ns for things like millions of dollars, and so on.
>>>
>>Thanks,
>>>
>>Daniele
>>>
>>[Followups set, please excuse the earlier message
>>alt.html.we b-accessibility which didn't get cross-posted]

>>
>Be sure your HTML indicates language, at the very beginning in your
>!DOCTYPE. This is important because some languages use commas as
>separators and periods as decimal points (e.g., English in the US and
>UK) and some languages reverse this, using periods as separators and
>commas as decimal points.
>>
>I would write out the numbers using numerals instead of words. This
>serves two purposes.
>>
>First of all, in some countries (e.g., the US) "billion" means a
>thousand million; in others, it means a million million. I think (not
>sure) this UK is in the latter group.

>
In the UK a million used to be 1,000,000,000,0 00 but it is now almost
universally accepted to be 1,000,000,000

Doh! I meant a billion, not a million.
Well spotted Ben C.

[Jukka K. Korpela]

Re: Standards for presentation of numerical data for usability and accessibility

Scripsit Dr J R Stockton:

>There are many opinions, practices, and recommendations on such
>matters, depending on language, authority, context, etc. And there is
>nothing particularly HTML-related here.

>
No;

So why do you keep discussing the issue here?

my intent was to be helpful to the OP,

Not all people realize that off-topic advice is usually wrong, and even in
an appropriate context, it would not be helpful to offer some opinions
without citations and without notes about the area of applicability.

The alphabetical code, while inappropriate for text intended to have
great literary appeal, can reasonably be used in paragraphs of a more
technical nature, and is certainly appropriate in relevant HTML tables.

There is nothing especially HTML-related here, despite your use of the
phrase "HTML tables". And this piece of advice is generally wrong, as
off-topic advice usually is. And codes, as opposite to names or commonly
known symbols like "$", are surely not _accessible_.

ObHTML: "HTML tables" aren't really tables; they are a messy mix of real
tables (tabular data) and layout settings, and more often used for the
latter.

--
Jukka K. Korpela ("Yucca")

http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/

[David E. Ross]

Re: Standards for presentation of numerical data for usability andaccessibilit y

On 8/13/2007 2:47 AM, Jukka K. Korpela wrote:

Scripsit Dr J R Stockton:
>

>>There are many opinions, practices, and recommendations on such
>>matters, depending on language, authority, context, etc. And there is
>>nothing particularly HTML-related here.

>No;

>
So why do you keep discussing the issue here?
>

>my intent was to be helpful to the OP,

>
Not all people realize that off-topic advice is usually wrong, and even in
an appropriate context, it would not be helpful to offer some opinions
without citations and without notes about the area of applicability.
>

>The alphabetical code, while inappropriate for text intended to have
>great literary appeal, can reasonably be used in paragraphs of a more
>technical nature, and is certainly appropriate in relevant HTML tables.

>
There is nothing especially HTML-related here, despite your use of the
phrase "HTML tables". And this piece of advice is generally wrong, as
off-topic advice usually is. And codes, as opposite to names or commonly
known symbols like "$", are surely not _accessible_.
>
ObHTML: "HTML tables" aren't really tables; they are a messy mix of real
tables (tabular data) and layout settings, and more often used for the
latter.
>

The original message from Procida in this thread referred to

formatting and presentation of numbers in web pages

Procida is authoring a Web page using HTML. This is most clearly
on-topic in this news group.

Further, he later expanded on his question by relating the issue to
accessibility. That, too, is on-topic.

--

David E. Ross
<http://www.rossde.com/>.

Anyone who thinks government owns a monopoly on inefficient, obstructive
bureaucracy has obviously never worked for a large corporation. © 1997

[André Gillibert]

Re: Standards for presentation of numerical data for usability and accessibility

Jukka K. Korpela wrote:

>
And some languages have varying practices. But does this matter? Almost
all browsers (and search engines) ignore language markup.

Jaws use it.
If you don't specify the language or lie about it, you may end up hearing
a voice with an awful accent.

--
You can contact me at <tabkanDELETETH ISnaz@yahoDELET ETHATo.fr>

[Andy Mabbett]

Re: Standards for presentation of numerical data for usability and accessibility

In message <i7%ui.205157$0 46.31555@reader 1.news.saunalah ti.fi>, Jukka K.
Korpela <jkorpela@cs.tu t.fiwrites

>In a more ideal world, we could use markup that indicates whether a
>sequence of digits (possibly with interspersed punctuation) is a
>mathematical number or a code-like notation (normally read digit by
>digit). But HTML has nothing like that.

CSS does, though:

speak: spell-out;

speak-numeral: digits;

See:

<http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/aural.html#spea king-props>
and:

<http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/aural.html#spee ch-props>

respectively. These are recognised by Opera, at least, and there's a
small test suite at:

<http://www.pigsonthewi ng.org.uk/opera.htm>

should anyone wish to try it.

[apologies for the belated response]

--
Andy Mabbett
* Say "NO!" to compulsory ID Cards: <http://www.no2id.net/>
* Free Our Data: <http://www.freeourdata .org.uk>
* Are you using Microformats, yet: <http://microformats.or g/?