simpler example of the padding bug

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Neredbojias

    #31
    Re: simpler example of the padding bug

    To further the education of mankind, ironcorona <iron.corona@gm ail.com>
    vouchsafed:
    [color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
    >>> I mean hell; if you really want to you can programme and distribute
    >>> your own browsers that only read your own, brand-new markup language.
    >>> It just wouldn't make people want to view your web pages.[/color]
    >>
    >> That would be taking a valid concept to an invalid extreme.[/color]
    >
    > That's true but what you're saying is IE will go away if we all close
    > our eyes and hope it does.[/color]

    No, I was implying that even mighty MS has to respect trends. IE could not
    have lasted forever as an inferior browser/whatchamacallit . The point is
    moot, anyway, since there is an IE7 in the offing.

    --
    Neredbojias
    Infinity has its limits.

    Comment

    • ironcorona

      #32
      Re: simpler example of the padding bug

      phil-news-nospam@ipal.net wrote:
      [color=blue]
      > That's because the button _is_ inside the cell. They exactly and correctly
      > represent my expectation. AND ... they also represent how Firefox really
      > did calculate the layout.[/color]

      No, it's not. How could it be. You have told the browser that the
      button is to be 100% of the cell. To pick an arbitrary figure this
      means that if the width of the cell is 50px then the width of the button
      MUST be 50px. What is 100% of 50px? 50px, of course.

      50px CAN NOT fit inside 50px.

      --
      Brian O'Connor (ironcorona)

      Comment

      • phil-news-nospam@ipal.net

        #33
        Re: simpler example of the padding bug

        On Fri, 12 May 2006 16:21:12 +0800 ironcorona <iron.corona@gm ail.com> wrote:
        | phil-news-nospam@ipal.net wrote:
        |
        |> That's because the button _is_ inside the cell. They exactly and correctly
        |> represent my expectation. AND ... they also represent how Firefox really
        |> did calculate the layout.
        |
        | No, it's not. How could it be. You have told the browser that the
        | button is to be 100% of the cell. To pick an arbitrary figure this
        | means that if the width of the cell is 50px then the width of the button
        | MUST be 50px. What is 100% of 50px? 50px, of course.
        |
        | 50px CAN NOT fit inside 50px.

        I interpret the standard a different way that you seem to. And Firefox
        did do the layout as I expected. It just did one aspect of drawing in a
        different way.

        --
        -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
        | Phil Howard KA9WGN | http://linuxhomepage.com/ http://ham.org/ |
        | (first name) at ipal.net | http://phil.ipal.org/ http://ka9wgn.ham.org/ |
        -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

        Comment

        • phil-news-nospam@ipal.net

          #34
          Re: simpler example of the padding bug

          On Fri, 12 May 2006 02:18:02 -0400 Neredbojias <http://www.neredbojias .com/fliam.php?cat=a lt.html> wrote:
          | To further the education of mankind, ironcorona <iron.corona@gm ail.com>
          | vouchsafed:
          |
          |>>> I mean hell; if you really want to you can programme and distribute
          |>>> your own browsers that only read your own, brand-new markup language.
          |>>> It just wouldn't make people want to view your web pages.
          |>>
          |>> That would be taking a valid concept to an invalid extreme.
          |>
          |> That's true but what you're saying is IE will go away if we all close
          |> our eyes and hope it does.
          |
          | No, I was implying that even mighty MS has to respect trends. IE could not
          | have lasted forever as an inferior browser/whatchamacallit . The point is
          | moot, anyway, since there is an IE7 in the offing.

          Which is letting them maintain an "arm's distance" from web standards.

          --
          -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          | Phil Howard KA9WGN | http://linuxhomepage.com/ http://ham.org/ |
          | (first name) at ipal.net | http://phil.ipal.org/ http://ka9wgn.ham.org/ |
          -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

          Comment

          • Neredbojias

            #35
            Re: simpler example of the padding bug

            To further the education of mankind, phil-news-nospam@ipal.net
            vouchsafed:
            [color=blue]
            >|> That's true but what you're saying is IE will go away if we all
            >|> close our eyes and hope it does.
            >|
            >| No, I was implying that even mighty MS has to respect trends. IE
            >| could not have lasted forever as an inferior browser/whatchamacallit .
            >| The point is moot, anyway, since there is an IE7 in the offing.
            >
            > Which is letting them maintain an "arm's distance" from web standards.[/color]

            Maybe, maybe not. While precedence has taught us to be cynical, who
            knows?, IEx just might turn into a "model citizen". If Microsoft has any
            real brains, it will...

            --
            Neredbojias
            Infinity has its limits.

            Comment

            • phil-news-nospam@ipal.net

              #36
              Re: simpler example of the padding bug

              On Fri, 12 May 2006 20:49:58 -0400 Neredbojias <http://www.neredbojias .com/fliam.php?cat=a lt.html> wrote:
              | To further the education of mankind, phil-news-nospam@ipal.net
              | vouchsafed:
              |
              |>|> That's true but what you're saying is IE will go away if we all
              |>|> close our eyes and hope it does.
              |>|
              |>| No, I was implying that even mighty MS has to respect trends. IE
              |>| could not have lasted forever as an inferior browser/whatchamacallit .
              |>| The point is moot, anyway, since there is an IE7 in the offing.
              |>
              |> Which is letting them maintain an "arm's distance" from web standards.
              |
              | Maybe, maybe not. While precedence has taught us to be cynical, who
              | knows?, IEx just might turn into a "model citizen". If Microsoft has any
              | real brains, it will...

              Reports from beta testers indicate disappointment. Apparently they do
              not even fully comply with CSS2, which has been out how many years?

              --
              -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              | Phil Howard KA9WGN | http://linuxhomepage.com/ http://ham.org/ |
              | (first name) at ipal.net | http://phil.ipal.org/ http://ka9wgn.ham.org/ |
              -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

              Comment

              • Neredbojias

                #37
                Re: simpler example of the padding bug

                To further the education of mankind, phil-news-nospam@ipal.net
                vouchsafed:
                [color=blue]
                >|> Which is letting them maintain an "arm's distance" from web
                >|> standards.
                >|
                >| Maybe, maybe not. While precedence has taught us to be cynical, who
                >| knows?, IEx just might turn into a "model citizen". If Microsoft has
                >| any real brains, it will...
                >
                > Reports from beta testers indicate disappointment. Apparently they do
                > not even fully comply with CSS2, which has been out how many years?[/color]

                Neither does any other browser...

                --
                Neredbojias
                Infinity has its limits.

                Comment

                Working...