div block size different in IE Firefox ?!?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Gian

    div block size different in IE Firefox ?!?

    Hi,

    I'm trying to use DIV instead of tables for positioning objects on the
    page.
    It was great till I realized that IE sizes DIVs differently from
    Firefox.
    Please see example at:


    The sidebar should be 200px wide, but Firefox is making that larger.

    What am I missing ?
    I'm going crazy...

    thanks for your time,
    -GianLuca

  • Arne

    #2
    Re: div block size different in IE Firefox ?!?

    Once upon a time *Gian* wrote:
    [color=blue]
    > Hi,
    >
    > I'm trying to use DIV instead of tables for positioning objects on the
    > page.
    > It was great till I realized that IE sizes DIVs differently from
    > Firefox.
    > Please see example at:
    > http://www.polidora.com/test.html
    >
    > The sidebar should be 200px wide, but Firefox is making that larger.
    >
    > What am I missing ?
    > I'm going crazy...[/color]

    "The requested URL /test.html was not found on this server."

    Do you have a full Doctype declaration on top of the page source?

    E.g.
    <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
    "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">

    With a missing doctype IE render the page in Quirks Mode. And among
    other effects, that gives the result for width that you describe.

    --
    /Arne

    Now ignoring all Google Groups posters who don't quote
    * From Google: http://www.safalra.com/special/googlegroupsreply/

    Comment

    • Gian

      #3
      Re: div block size different in IE Firefox ?!?

      Arne,
      thanks for your kind reply.
      I posted the example just a couple of minutes after my post.
      You should see it know, and yes, there is a full Doctype declaration.
      The different div size is very apparent.
      The image is 600px, and the DIV should be 200px.
      -Gian

      Comment

      • Knud Gert Ellentoft

        #4
        Re: div block size different in IE Firefox ?!?

        Gian skrev:
        [color=blue]
        >You should see it know, and yes, there is a full Doctype declaration.[/color]

        No, there are not.

        You have
        <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
        IE will go in quirk mode with this.

        Use
        <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
        or the one, that Arne had in his answer.

        You’ve done everything right, but your site is breaking in the latest browsers. A faulty DOCTYPE is likely to blame. This essential ALA article will provide you with DOCTYPEs that work, enabl…

        --
        Topposter du svar, dvs. skriver dit svar over det citerede,
        så ryger du på min ignoreringslist e.
        Svar under det du citerer og citer kun det du svarer på - tak.

        Comment

        • Gian

          #5
          Re: div block size different in IE Firefox ?!?

          I'm really sorry, but didn't you -we- write the very same declaration
          ?!

          Comment

          • Gian

            #6
            Re: div block size different in IE Firefox ?!?

            Ok. Arne was right, and *his* declaration does produce the same output
            on IE/FF.
            Thanks.
            Thanks you both for your kind help.
            -Gian

            Comment

            • Arne

              #7
              Re: div block size different in IE Firefox ?!?

              Once upon a time *Gian* wrote:
              [color=blue]
              > Arne,
              > thanks for your kind reply.
              > I posted the example just a couple of minutes after my post.
              > You should see it know, and yes, there is a full Doctype declaration.
              > The different div size is very apparent.
              > The image is 600px, and the DIV should be 200px.[/color]

              <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">

              That's what you have, but that's not a *full* doctype since the link to
              the *.dtd file is missing.

              BTW, please notice the link in my sig about quoting the post's you
              respond to.

              As many others, I normaly ignore posters who don't quote (or top post),
              so this is an exeption in case you are new on usenet and I like to give
              newbies a fair chance. Posting proberly according to usenet standards,
              will give you more responses in the future.

              --
              /Arne

              Now ignoring all Google Groups posters who don't quote
              * From Google: http://www.safalra.com/special/googlegroupsreply/

              Comment

              Working...