W3C validator error isn't really an error?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • TomB
    #1

    W3C validator error isn't really an error?

    I'm getting an error from the W3C validator on one of my pages:

    Just a moment...
    http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fdusk-metal.kicks-ass.org%2Fgbook_add.php


    However, according to the 4.1 specs maxlenght *is* a valid attribute for
    the form element.
    Or am I missing something here?

    Kind regards

    Tommy
    Tags: None
    • RobG
      #2
      Re: W3C validator error isn't really an error?

      TomB wrote:[color=blue]
      > I'm getting an error from the W3C validator on one of my pages:
      >
      > http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ht...Fgbook_add.php
      >
      >
      > However, according to the 4.1 specs maxlenght *is* a valid attribute for
      > the form element.
      > Or am I missing something here?[/color]

      Yup, read the error:

      "...there is no attribute 'MAXLENGHT' "


      Change that attribute to "maxlength" and you may have more sucess! :-)


      --
      Rob

        Comment

        • TomB
          #3
          Re: W3C validator error isn't really an error?

          RobG wrote:[color=blue]
          > TomB wrote:
          >[color=green]
          >> I'm getting an error from the W3C validator on one of my pages:
          >>
          >> http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ht...Fgbook_add.php
          >>
          >>
          >> However, according to the 4.1 specs maxlenght *is* a valid attribute
          >> for the form element.
          >> Or am I missing something here?[/color]
          >
          >
          > Yup, read the error:
          >
          > "...there is no attribute 'MAXLENGHT' "
          >
          >
          > Change that attribute to "maxlength" and you may have more sucess! :-)
          >
          >[/color]

          OMG O_o

          How's that for a first post uh!! :-D
          Anyway, it validates now. Thanks a lot for your assistance :-p

            Comment

            • Blinky the Shark
              #4
              Re: W3C validator error isn't really an error?

              TomB wrote:[color=blue]
              > RobG wrote:[color=green]
              >> TomB wrote:
              >>[color=darkred]
              >>> I'm getting an error from the W3C validator on one of my pages:
              >>>
              >>> http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ht...Fgbook_add.php
              >>>
              >>> However, according to the 4.1 specs maxlenght *is* a valid attribute
              >>> for the form element.
              >>> Or am I missing something here?[/color]
              >>
              >>
              >> Yup, read the error:
              >>
              >> "...there is no attribute 'MAXLENGHT' "
              >>
              >> Change that attribute to "maxlength" and you may have more sucess! :-)[/color]
              >
              > OMG O_o
              >
              > How's that for a first post uh!! :-D[/color]

              Well, at least you were consistent, misspelling it both in your markup
              and in your post... :)


              --
              Blinky Linux Registered User 297263

              Killing All Posts from GG: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
              End Of The Good GG Archive GUI: http://blinkynet.net/comp/gggui.html

                Comment

                Previous template Next
                Working...