Search Result

Pooria · Jul 21 '10, 08:15 AM

take following class and two object definitions:

Code:

class Rect{
 public:
  enum centimeter;
  enum meter;
  Rect(double len,double wid,enum centimeter){
   length=(len/100);
   width=(wid/100);
  }
  Rect(int len,int wid,enum meter){
   length=len;
   width=wid;
  }
  //rest of implementation
 private:
  double length;//in meters

...

Pooria · Jul 21 '10, 08:13 AM

take two following classes and their constructors as samples:

Code:

class One{
 public:
  One(int a,int b):adad1(a),adad2(b){}
 private:
  int adad1;
  int adad2;
};
class Two{
 public:
  Two(int input[]){
   for (int i=0;i<10;i++)
    araye[i]=input[i];
  }
 private:
  int araye[10];
};

considering objects with static...

Pooria · Jul 21 '10, 08:09 AM

take two following classes:

Code:

class Test1{
 public:
  Test1()=default;
  Test1(char in1,char in2):char1(in1),char2(in2){}
  char char1;
  char char2;
};
class Test2{
 public:
  Test2()=default;
  Test2(char in1,char in2):char1(in1),char2(in2){}
 private:
  char char1;
  char char2;
};

I know in c++0x both of these classes...

Pooria · Jul 16 '10, 02:23 PM

Suppose we have following two classes:

Code:

class Temp{
 public:
  char a;
  char b;
};
class Final{
 private:
  int a;
  char b;
  char c;
 public:
  Final(Temp in):b(in.a),c(in.b){}
  //rest of implementation
};

can we initialize an object of the Final class with following syntax in upcoming c++0x standard:
Final obj(Temp{'a','b '}...

Search Result

does adding a dummy parameter to constructors of a class to solve calling ambiguity,

which kinds of constructors may be applied during compile time as optimization.

relation between access specifiers and using initializer lists for POD types in c++0x

Will this initialization syntax be valid in upcoming c++0x standard ?