take following class and two object definitions:
two previous constructors have dummy enum parameters to solve calling ambiguity caused in case these dummy parameters didn't exist. Now in spite of possibility of using named constructors here, if I insist on using these dummy parameters, does this violate any coding rule that I should be aware of ?
Code:
class Rect{
public:
enum centimeter;
enum meter;
Rect(double len,double wid,enum centimeter){
length=(len/100);
width=(wid/100);
}
Rect(int len,int wid,enum meter){
length=len;
width=wid;
}
//rest of implementation
private:
double length;//in meters
double width;//in meters
};
Rect obj1(10,5,Rect::centimeter());
Rect obj2(10,5,Rect::meter());