C plus plus vs C Sharp

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • djinni

    #16
    Re: [TROLL] Re: C plus plus vs C Sharp


    On Sat, 9 Aug 2003, Rolf Magnus wrote:
    [color=blue]
    > This is an obvious troll. Please ignore it.
    >[/color]


    What does 'troll' stand for?


    -dj

    Comment

    • chris

      #17
      Re: C plus plus vs C Sharp

      Not even to the lions? ;)

      Comment

      • Nils Petter Vaskinn

        #18
        Re: C plus plus vs C Sharp

        On Sat, 09 Aug 2003 02:47:23 -0700, The LoxFather wrote:
        [color=blue]
        > Coming from a VB background, which should .NET language should I
        > learn....C++ or C Sharp. Is C++ going to be dead soon?[/color]

        Both. No.

        Offtopic in c.l.c
        Probably offtopic in c.l.c++
        Probably offtopic in c.l.v.b
        100% offtopic in rec.photo.equip ment.35mm
        100% offtopic in rec.woodworking

        Troll.

        FUT set to alt.dev.null


        hth
        NPV

        Comment

        • Johan Lexington

          #19
          Re: C plus plus vs C Sharp

          C# is a new improved version of C++. It is somewhere between C++ and
          Java. Learning the .net platform is an entirely different matter.


          Thomas Matthews <Thomas_Matthew sHatesSpam@sbcg lobal.net> wrote in message news:<A2OZa.203 05$Vx2.10462394 @newssvr28.news .prodigy.com>.. .[color=blue]
          > The LoxFather wrote:
          >[color=green]
          > > Coming from a VB background, which should .NET language should I
          > > learn....C++ or C Sharp. Is C++ going to be dead soon?[/color]
          > Would you please stop posting this question.
          > You have reworded it, but alas, it is the same and has been dealt
          > with before.
          >
          > Search the C++, C and VB newsgroups for messages that are
          > destined for "rec.woodworkin g".
          >
          > If you are going to post again, to the same groups,
          > please tell us how you are relating the topic to all of the
          > newsgroups you posted to. I don't see the relationship between
          > programming and woodworking from your post's content.
          >
          > {Programming a robotic woodworking machine would be an interesting
          > concept though.}
          >
          > --
          > Thomas Matthews
          >
          > C++ newsgroup welcome message:
          > http://www.slack.net/~shiva/welcome.txt
          > C++ Faq: http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite
          > C Faq: http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/c-faq/top.html
          > alt.comp.lang.l earn.c-c++ faq:
          > http://www.raos.demon.uk/acllc-c++/faq.html
          > Other sites:
          > http://www.josuttis.com -- C++ STL Library book[/color]

          Comment

          • Martin Ambuhl

            #20
            Re: C plus plus vs C Sharp

            Johan Lexington wrote:
            [color=blue]
            > C# is a new improved version of C++.[/color]

            Obviously, no one has any reason to take seriously anything Johan Lexington
            has to say. The above was posted by either a troll or an idiot.


            --
            Martin Ambuhl

            Comment

            • Alan Browne

              #21
              Re: C plus plus vs C Sharp



              Martin Ambuhl wrote:[color=blue]
              > Johan Lexington wrote:
              >[color=green]
              >> C# is a new improved version of C++.[/color]
              >
              >
              > Obviously, no one has any reason to take seriously anything Johan
              > Lexington has to say. The above was posted by either a troll or an idiot.
              >
              >[/color]

              Congratulations ... you're right on both counts.

              PLEASE EVERYONE: DO NOT X-POST REPLIES
              =============== =============== =========


              Comment

              Working...