3.5 Framework

**IfThenElse** · Sep 28 '07, 03:55 PM

Re: 3.5 Framework

When you develop an application in .NET Framework 2.0 you better have .NET
Framework 2.0 installed.
Same goes for 3.5 or 4.0 for 10.6

<bmckenna@gmail .comwrote in message
news:1190990388 .922036.77620@k 79g2000hse.goog legroups.com...

Hi there,
>
I recently built a relatively simple application in VB.net using
VS Studio 2008(the front end is attached to an Access database).
Everything seems to run smoothly on my machine and on any other
machine that has the .net 3.5 framework installed, but on any machines
running .net 2.0 or 1.1 I get an error message stating "Could not load
file or assembly 'System.Data.Da taSetExtensions , Version=2.0.0.0 " I'm
using the dataset object to load the database records so I'm assuming
the problem is related to this.
>
OK, so as a .net newbie, here is my question - do machines running
applications developed in .net 3.5 HAVE to have the 3.5 framework
installed? TIA.
>

**bmckenna@gmail.com** · Sep 28 '07, 04:05 PM

Re: 3.5 Framework

On Sep 28, 11:21 am, "IfThenElse " <sql_agent...@h otmail.comwrote :

When you develop an application in .NET Framework 2.0 you better have .NET
Framework 2.0 installed.
Same goes for 3.5 or 4.0 for 10.6
>
<bmcke...@gmail .comwrote in message
>
news:1190990388 .922036.77620@k 79g2000hse.goog legroups.com...
>

Hi there,

>

I recently built a relatively simple application in VB.net using
VS Studio 2008(the front end is attached to an Access database).
Everything seems to run smoothly on my machine and on any other
machine that has the .net 3.5 framework installed, but on any machines
running .net 2.0 or 1.1 I get an error message stating "Could not load
file or assembly 'System.Data.Da taSetExtensions , Version=2.0.0.0 " I'm
using the dataset object to load the database records so I'm assuming
the problem is related to this.

>

OK, so as a .net newbie, here is my question - do machines running
applications developed in .net 3.5 HAVE to have the 3.5 framework
installed? TIA.

Thanks ITE - just to clarify - it's necessary to install 3.5 on the
USER'S machines as well, correct?(obviou sly the framework has to be on
the machine I developed the application on).

**Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]** · Sep 29 '07, 12:05 PM

Re: 3.5 Framework

<bmckenna@gmail .comschrieb:

Thanks ITE - just to clarify - it's necessary to install 3.5 on the
USER'S machines as well, correct?(obviou sly the framework has to be on
the machine I developed the application on).

Yes, if you are using .NET 3.5 functionality.

--
M S Herfried K. Wagner
M V P <URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/>
V B <URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/dotnet/faqs/>

**Lim Eng Keong** · Oct 9 '07, 02:55 PM

Re: 3.5 Framework

Yup.

<bmckenna@gmail .comwrote in message
news:1190995134 .531435.107950@ o80g2000hse.goo glegroups.com.. .

On Sep 28, 11:21 am, "IfThenElse " <sql_agent...@h otmail.comwrote :

>When you develop an application in .NET Framework 2.0 you better have
>.NET
>Framework 2.0 installed.
>Same goes for 3.5 or 4.0 for 10.6
>>
><bmcke...@gmai l.comwrote in message
>>
>news:119099038 8.922036.77620@ k79g2000hse.goo glegroups.com.. .
>>

Hi there,

>>

I recently built a relatively simple application in VB.net using
VS Studio 2008(the front end is attached to an Access database).
Everything seems to run smoothly on my machine and on any other
machine that has the .net 3.5 framework installed, but on any machines
running .net 2.0 or 1.1 I get an error message stating "Could not load
file or assembly 'System.Data.Da taSetExtensions , Version=2.0.0.0 " I'm
using the dataset object to load the database records so I'm assuming
the problem is related to this.

>>

OK, so as a .net newbie, here is my question - do machines running
applications developed in .net 3.5 HAVE to have the 3.5 framework
installed? TIA.

>
Thanks ITE - just to clarify - it's necessary to install 3.5 on the
USER'S machines as well, correct?(obviou sly the framework has to be on
the machine I developed the application on).
>

**Jerry Spence1** · Dec 6 '07, 11:05 AM

Re: 3.5 Framework

This raises an interesting question in my mind. Where can we find out what
the differences are between various versions of .NET. I've tried a Google
seach and there's a whole load on what it does, but I can't find a detail
version difference table anywhere.

And also, since I have all versions loaded on my PC, how can I tell which
version VB.Net is using, and change it if needed?

-Jerry

"Lim Eng Keong" <admin@infoct.n etwrote in message
news:uIFyhLoCIH A.3848@TK2MSFTN GP05.phx.gbl...

Yup.
>
<bmckenna@gmail .comwrote in message
news:1190995134 .531435.107950@ o80g2000hse.goo glegroups.com.. .

>On Sep 28, 11:21 am, "IfThenElse " <sql_agent...@h otmail.comwrote :

>>When you develop an application in .NET Framework 2.0 you better have
>>.NET
>>Framework 2.0 installed.
>>Same goes for 3.5 or 4.0 for 10.6
>>>
>><bmcke...@gma il.comwrote in message
>>>
>>news:11909903 88.922036.77620 @k79g2000hse.go oglegroups.com. ..
>>>
>Hi there,
>>>
> I recently built a relatively simple application in VB.net using
>VS Studio 2008(the front end is attached to an Access database).
>Everything seems to run smoothly on my machine and on any other
>machine that has the .net 3.5 framework installed, but on any machines
>running .net 2.0 or 1.1 I get an error message stating "Could not load
>file or assembly 'System.Data.Da taSetExtensions , Version=2.0.0.0 " I'm
>using the dataset object to load the database records so I'm assuming
>the problem is related to this.
>>>
>OK, so as a .net newbie, here is my question - do machines running
>applications developed in .net 3.5 HAVE to have the 3.5 framework
>installed? TIA.

>>
>Thanks ITE - just to clarify - it's necessary to install 3.5 on the
>USER'S machines as well, correct?(obviou sly the framework has to be on
>the machine I developed the application on).
>>

>

3.5 Framework

3.5 Framework

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment