.net frame work 3

**Rory Becker** · Jun 25 '07, 11:45 AM

Re: .net frame work 3

Does any one know the difference between .net 2 and .net 3

..Net 3.0 = .Net2.0 + WPF + WCF + a few others

And does program made with vb2005 .net 2 works on windows vista

Yes

And can i make compatibility of vb2005 with the .net 3

Sorry I'm not sure I understand this one.

Possibly you mean "Can I code against .Net 3.0 with VS2005?"

If so then the answer is yes although you will likely need the November CTP
of the VS2005 Extentionsfor some bits.

I don't have a lot of knowledge in this area, perhaps someone else can fill
in the blanks.

--
Rory

**Omar Abid** · Jun 25 '07, 12:15 PM

Re: .net frame work 3

On Jun 25, 1:40 pm, Rory Becker <RoryBec...@new sgroup.nospamwr ote:

Does any one know the difference between .net 2 and .net 3

>
.Net 3.0 = .Net2.0 + WPF + WCF + a few others
>

And does program made with vb2005 .net 2 works on windows vista

>
Yes
>

And can i make compatibility of vb2005 with the .net 3

>
Sorry I'm not sure I understand this one.
>
Possibly you mean "Can I code against .Net 3.0 with VS2005?"
>
If so then the answer is yes although you will likely need the November CTP
of the VS2005 Extentionsfor some bits.
>
I don't have a lot of knowledge in this area, perhaps someone else can fill
in the blanks.
>
--
Rory

Thx 4 reply what i want is that can i use .net frame work 3 instead of
version 2 in programing with vb2005
Omar Abid

**Phill W.** · Jun 25 '07, 12:15 PM

Re: .net frame work 3

Omar Abid wrote:

Does any one know the difference between .net 2 and .net 3

dotNet_3 = dotNet_2 + Whizzo_Vista_sp ecific_classes

And does program made with vb2005 .net 2 works on windows vista

VB2005 /SP1/, yes.

And can i make compatibility of vb2005 with the .net 3

Just add references to the "new" bits you want to use.

HTH,
Phill W.

**Omar Abid** · Jun 25 '07, 12:25 PM

Re: .net frame work 3

On Jun 25, 2:13 pm, "Phill W." <p-.-a-.-w-a-r...@-o-p-e-n-.-a-c-.-u-k>
wrote:

Omar Abid wrote:

Does any one know the difference between .net 2 and .net 3

>
dotNet_3 = dotNet_2 + Whizzo_Vista_sp ecific_classes
>

And does program made with vb2005 .net 2 works on windows vista

>
VB2005 /SP1/, yes.
>

And can i make compatibility of vb2005 with the .net 3

>
Just add references to the "new" bits you want to use.
>
HTH,
Phill W.

thx

**Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]** · Jun 25 '07, 06:55 PM

Re: .net frame work 3

"Omar Abid" <omar.abid2006@ gmail.comschrie b:

Thx 4 reply what i want is that can i use .net frame work 3 instead of
version 2 in programing with vb2005

Yes and no. The programming languages and libraries which are part of .NET
2.0 have not changed with .NET 3.0. .NET 3.0 simply adds some additional
class libraries, which you can reference from within your projects.

--
M S Herfried K. Wagner
M V P <URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/>
V B <URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/dotnet/faqs/>

**Omar Abid** · Jun 26 '07, 09:05 AM

Re: .net frame work 3

On Jun 25, 8:48 pm, "Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]" <hirf-spam-me-
h...@gmx.atwrot e:

"Omar Abid" <omar.abid2...@ gmail.comschrie b:
>

Thx 4 reply what i want is that can i use .net frame work 3 instead of
version 2 in programing with vb2005

>
Yes and no. The programming languages and libraries which are part of .NET
2.0 have not changed with .NET 3.0. .NET 3.0 simply adds some additional
class libraries, which you can reference from within your projects.
>
--
M S Herfried K. Wagner
M V P <URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/>
V B <URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/dotnet/faqs/>

and can i use those new libraries ?

**Rory Becker** · Jun 26 '07, 09:15 AM

Re: .net frame work 3

"Omar Abid" <omar.abid2006@ gmail.comschrie b:

>

>Thx 4 reply what i want is that can i use .net frame work 3 instead
>of version 2 in programing with vb2005
>>

Yes and no. The programming languages and libraries which are part of
.NET 2.0 have not changed with .NET 3.0. .NET 3.0 simply adds some
additional class libraries, which you can reference from within your
projects.
>

I don't understand why part of your answer is No. The simple fact is that
if .net 3.0 SDK is installed then he can reference the libraries it contains
from VS2005 (albeit with SP1 installed as Phil pointed out)

--
Rory

**Spam Catcher** · Jun 26 '07, 10:15 AM

Re: .net frame work 3

"Phill W." <p-.-a-.-w-a-r-d-@-o-p-e-n-.-a-c-.-u-kwrote in news:f5obi1$qn2
$3@south.jnrs.j a.net:

>Does any one know the difference between .net 2 and .net 3

>
dotNet_3 = dotNet_2 + Whizzo_Vista_sp ecific_classes

WCF, WPF, WFF, WCS all rujn under XP too!

**Omar Abid** · Jun 26 '07, 11:05 AM

Re: .net frame work 3

On Jun 26, 12:06 pm, Spam Catcher <spamhoney...@r ogers.comwrote:

"Phill W." <p-.-a-.-w-a-r...@-o-p-e-n-.-a-c-.-u-kwrote in news:f5obi1$qn2
$...@south.jnrs .ja.net:
>

Does any one know the difference between .net 2 and .net 3

>

dotNet_3 = dotNet_2 + Whizzo_Vista_sp ecific_classes

>
WCF, WPF, WFF, WCS all rujn under XP too!

what r those tools ??

**Spam Catcher** · Jun 26 '07, 03:45 PM

Re: .net frame work 3

Omar Abid <omar.abid2006@ gmail.comwrote in
news:1182855872 .346929.301990@ q75g2000hsh.goo glegroups.com:

On Jun 26, 12:06 pm, Spam Catcher <spamhoney...@r ogers.comwrote:

>"Phill W." <p-.-a-.-w-a-r...@-o-p-e-n-.-a-c-.-u-kwrote in
>news:f5obi1$qn 2 $...@south.jnrs .ja.net:
>>

>Does any one know the difference between .net 2 and .net 3

>>

dotNet_3 = dotNet_2 + Whizzo_Vista_sp ecific_classes

>>
>WCF, WPF, WFF, WCS all rujn under XP too!

>
what r those tools ??

Windows Communications Framework (Remoting Replacement)
Windows Presentation Foundation (New GUI framework)
Windows WorkFlow Foundation (Workflow engine)
Windows CardSpaces (Security Framework)

**=?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=F6ran_Andersson?=** · Jun 26 '07, 04:35 PM

Re: .net frame work 3

Rory Becker wrote:

>"Omar Abid" <omar.abid2006@ gmail.comschrie b:
>>

>>Thx 4 reply what i want is that can i use .net frame work 3 instead
>>of version 2 in programing with vb2005
>>>

>Yes and no. The programming languages and libraries which are part of
>.NET 2.0 have not changed with .NET 3.0. .NET 3.0 simply adds some
>additional class libraries, which you can reference from within your
>projects.
>>

>
I don't understand why part of your answer is No. The simple fact is
that if .net 3.0 SDK is installed then he can reference the libraries it
contains from VS2005 (albeit with SP1 installed as Phil pointed out)

I suppose that the "no" part is that you can't use VB.NET 3.0 instead of
VB.NET 2.0 in .NET framework 3.0, because .NET framework 3.0 still uses
VB.NET 2.0.

--
Göran Andersson
_____

guffa.com

http://www.guffa.com

Göran Anderssons privata hemsida.

**=?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=F6ran_Andersson?=** · Jun 27 '07, 10:25 AM

Re: .net frame work 3

Omar Abid wrote:

On Jun 26, 6:29 pm, Göran Andersson <g...@guffa.com wrote:

>Rory Becker wrote:

>>>"Omar Abid" <omar.abid2...@ gmail.comschrie b:
>>>>Thx 4 reply what i want is that can i use .net frame work 3 instead
>>>>of version 2 in programing with vb2005
>>>Yes and no. The programming languages and libraries which are part of
>>>.NET 2.0 have not changed with .NET 3.0. .NET 3.0 simply adds some
>>>additional class libraries, which you can reference from within your
>>>projects.
>>I don't understand why part of your answer is No. The simple fact is
>>that if .net 3.0 SDK is installed then he can reference the libraries it
>>contains from VS2005 (albeit with SP1 installed as Phil pointed out)

>I suppose that the "no" part is that you can't use VB.NET 3.0 instead of
>VB.NET 2.0 in .NET framework 3.0, because .NET framework 3.0 still uses
>VB.NET 2.0.
>>
>--
>Göran Andersson
>_____http://www.guffa.com

>
but you suppose !! I want to know if Microsoft has sure things about
that
>

I suppose that's what Herfried ment when writing "Yes and no".

That fact that .NET framework 3.0 uses VB.NET 2.0 is certainly a fact.

--
Göran Andersson
_____

guffa.com

http://www.guffa.com

Göran Anderssons privata hemsida.

**Omar Abid** · Jun 27 '07, 10:25 AM

Re: .net frame work 3

On Jun 27, 11:12 am, Rory Becker <RoryBec...@new sgroup.nospamwr ote:

I agree with Göran entirely.
>
Fact 1: 3.0 contains and extends 2.0 whilst still running on the same CLR
>
My only question was regarding how the answer to the OP's question could
be even slightly No.
>
I believe Göran's supposition was regarding what Herfied meant by 'No'.
>
He was not supposing about Fact 1 (above).
>
--
Rory

Ok, the best solution is to install .net 3 and try it my self

**Rory Becker** · Jun 27 '07, 10:45 AM

Re: .net frame work 3

I agree with Göran entirely.

Fact 1: 3.0 contains and extends 2.0 whilst still running on the same CLR

My only question was regarding how the answer to the OP's question could
be even slightly No.

I believe Göran's supposition was regarding what Herfied meant by 'No'.

He was not supposing about Fact 1 (above).

--
Rory

.net frame work 3

.net frame work 3

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment