Is there method to verify that a value is integer and not double
Thank you,
Samuel
Thank you,
Samuel
-
-
Re: Type validation
You can take its ceiling or floor, and compare it to the original value. If
they are the same, then it is an integer.
"Samuel Shulman" <samuel.shulman @ntlworld.comwr ote in message
news:Oe3hJHasGH A.3556@TK2MSFTN GP03.phx.gbl...Is there method to verify that a value is integer and not double
>
Thank you,
Samuel
>
>
-
Re: Type validation
Thanks
"Marina Levit [MVP]" <someone@nospam .comwrote in message
news:uxKXKLasGH A.2240@TK2MSFTN GP04.phx.gbl...You can take its ceiling or floor, and compare it to the original value.
If they are the same, then it is an integer.
>
"Samuel Shulman" <samuel.shulman @ntlworld.comwr ote in message
news:Oe3hJHasGH A.3556@TK2MSFTN GP03.phx.gbl...>>Is there method to verify that a value is integer and not double
>>
>Thank you,
>Samuel
>>
>>
>
Comment
-
Re: Type validation
Let's see if anyone guesses what is the
ceiling of 10.000000000000 001D
:)
-tom
Samuel Shulman ha scritto:
Thanks
>
>
>
"Marina Levit [MVP]" <someone@nospam .comwrote in message
news:uxKXKLasGH A.2240@TK2MSFTN GP04.phx.gbl...You can take its ceiling or floor, and compare it to the original value.
If they are the same, then it is an integer.
"Samuel Shulman" <samuel.shulman @ntlworld.comwr ote in message
news:Oe3hJHasGH A.3556@TK2MSFTN GP03.phx.gbl...Is there method to verify that a value is integer and not double
>
Thank you,
Samuel
>
>Comment
-
Re: Type validation
11
<tommaso.gastal di@uniroma1.itw rote in message
news:1154029554 .988657.13780@i 3g2000cwc.googl egroups.com...Let's see if anyone guesses what is the
ceiling of 10.000000000000 001D
>
:)
>
-tom
>
Samuel Shulman ha scritto:
>>>Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>"Marina Levit [MVP]" <someone@nospam .comwrote in message
>news:uxKXKLasG HA.2240@TK2MSFT NGP04.phx.gbl.. .You can take its ceiling or floor, and compare it to the original
value.
If they are the same, then it is an integer.
>
"Samuel Shulman" <samuel.shulman @ntlworld.comwr ote in message
news:Oe3hJHasGH A.3556@TK2MSFTN GP03.phx.gbl...
>Is there method to verify that a value is integer and not double
>>
>Thank you,
>Samuel
>>
>>
>
>
Comment
-
Re: Type validation
:) try
MsgBox(Math.Cei ling(10.0000000 00000001D))
with both VB2003 and then with VB 2005. You will see at MS
have changed opinion about the result :)
-tom
Samuel Shulman ha scritto:
11
>
>
<tommaso.gastal di@uniroma1.itw rote in message
news:1154029554 .988657.13780@i 3g2000cwc.googl egroups.com...Let's see if anyone guesses what is the
ceiling of 10.000000000000 001D
:)
-tom
Samuel Shulman ha scritto:
Thanks
>
>
>
"Marina Levit [MVP]" <someone@nospam .comwrote in message
news:uxKXKLasGH A.2240@TK2MSFTN GP04.phx.gbl...
You can take its ceiling or floor, and compare it to the original
value.
If they are the same, then it is an integer.
"Samuel Shulman" <samuel.shulman @ntlworld.comwr ote in message
news:Oe3hJHasGH A.3556@TK2MSFTN GP03.phx.gbl...
Is there method to verify that a value is integer and not double
>
Thank you,
Samuel
>
>
Comment
-
Re: Type validation
Any explanation?
<tommaso.gastal di@uniroma1.itw rote in message
news:1154033239 .853095.189720@ h48g2000cwc.goo glegroups.com.. .:) try
>
MsgBox(Math.Cei ling(10.0000000 00000001D))
>
with both VB2003 and then with VB 2005. You will see at MS
have changed opinion about the result :)
>
-tom
>
Samuel Shulman ha scritto:
>>>11
>>
>>
><tommaso.gasta ldi@uniroma1.it wrote in message
>news:115402955 4.988657.13780@ i3g2000cwc.goog legroups.com...Let's see if anyone guesses what is the
ceiling of 10.000000000000 001D
>
:)
>
-tom
>
Samuel Shulman ha scritto:
>
>Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>"Marina Levit [MVP]" <someone@nospam .comwrote in message
>news:uxKXKLasG HA.2240@TK2MSFT NGP04.phx.gbl.. .
You can take its ceiling or floor, and compare it to the original
value.
If they are the same, then it is an integer.
>
"Samuel Shulman" <samuel.shulman @ntlworld.comwr ote in message
news:Oe3hJHasGH A.3556@TK2MSFTN GP03.phx.gbl...
>Is there method to verify that a value is integer and not double
>>
>Thank you,
>Samuel
>>
>>
>
>
>
Comment
Comment