Property question

[Pedro]

Is it possible to have a property with its GET to public and its SET to
private or friend?

or vice versa

[Theo Verweij]

Re: Property question

This was possible in VB6, but as far as I know not in .Net

But, you can simulate it like this:

Private fStorageField as string

Public Readonly Propery StorageField() As String
Get
Return fStorageField
End Get
End Property

Private, you use fStorageField (which is RW), and public you use
Storagefield (Which is RO)

Or, the other way around:
Private fStorageField as string

Public Writeonly Propery StorageField() As String
Set(ByVal value as string)
fStorageField = value
End Get
End Property

Private, you use fStorageField (which is RW), and public you use
Storagefield (Which is WO)

Instead of private, you can also use Friend.



Pedro wrote:

Is it possible to have a property with its GET to public and its SET to
private or friend?
>
or vice versa
>
>

[Göran Andersson]

Re: Property question

Pedro wrote:

Is it possible to have a property with its GET to public and its SET to
private or friend?
>
or vice versa
>
>

Yes. Example from MSDN:

public string Name
{
get
{
return name;
}
protected set
{
name = value;
}
}

[Theo Verweij]

Re: Property question

Yust learned something today!
It works also in VB!

Göran Andersson wrote:

Pedro wrote:

>Is it possible to have a property with its GET to public and its SET
>to private or friend?
>>
>or vice versa
>>
>>

Yes. Example from MSDN:

public string Name
{
get
{
return name;
}
protected set
{
name = value;
}
}

[Göran Andersson]

Re: Property question

Right. Sorry about posting C# code in the VB forum.

Theo Verweij wrote:

Yust learned something today!
It works also in VB!
>
Göran Andersson wrote:

>Pedro wrote:

>>Is it possible to have a property with its GET to public and its SET
>>to private or friend?
>>>
>>or vice versa
>>>
>>>

>>
>Yes. Example from MSDN:
>>
>public string Name
>{
> get
> {
> return name;
> }
> protected set
> {
> name = value;
> }
>}

>

[Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]]

Re: Property question

"Theo Verweij" <tverweij@xs4al l.nlschrieb:

This was possible in VB6, but as far as I know not in .Net

It's possible in VB 2005 again!

--
M S Herfried K. Wagner
M V P <URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/>
V B <URL:http://classicvb.org/petition/>

[Michel Posseth [MCP]]

Re: Property question

It's possible in VB 2005 again!

And again we saw a feature that was already known in VB6 return to VB.net
:-)


regards

Michel Posseth [MCP]


"Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]" <hirf-spam-me-here@gmx.atschr eef in bericht
news:%23DEM9D4o GHA.504@TK2MSFT NGP05.phx.gbl.. .

"Theo Verweij" <tverweij@xs4al l.nlschrieb:

>This was possible in VB6, but as far as I know not in .Net

>
It's possible in VB 2005 again!
>
--
M S Herfried K. Wagner
M V P <URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/>
V B <URL:http://classicvb.org/petition/>

[Theo Verweij]

Re: Property question

And thats why I waited till VB2005 before I went away from VB6 ;-)

Michel Posseth [MCP] wrote:

>It's possible in VB 2005 again!

>
And again we saw a feature that was already known in VB6 return to VB.net
:-)
>
>
regards
>
Michel Posseth [MCP]
>
>
"Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]" <hirf-spam-me-here@gmx.atschr eef in bericht
news:%23DEM9D4o GHA.504@TK2MSFT NGP05.phx.gbl.. .

>"Theo Verweij" <tverweij@xs4al l.nlschrieb:

>>This was possible in VB6, but as far as I know not in .Net

>It's possible in VB 2005 again!
>>
>--
>M S Herfried K. Wagner
>M V P <URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/>
>V B <URL:http://classicvb.org/petition/>

>
>