Password Protect

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Miro

    #1

    Password Protect

    Why Password protect an MDB when someone can google and get a hack?

    Wondering if anyone else has thought of this and just said "oh well"...

    I plan to password protect an MDB where I have some system/program variables
    and data.

    But looking in google, there are plenty of programs a user can download to
    hack and crack that password.

    So Im assuming... let the hacks and cracks be, do the MDB and if someone
    really wants to see some system
    varables ( such as last 10 logins ) and things like that...let them.

    I havn't read up on encryption yet and seen if that can be reversed as well.

    Just wondering for some simple ideas what others have done. At some point
    it doesnt become worth my time
    to lock it down, time wasted could be better spent somewhere else.

    Thanks,

    Miro


  • R. MacDonald

    #2
    Re: Password Protect

    Hello, Miro,

    You need to first consider the reasons that you need protection and the
    threats/consequences that you face. Then decide the level of security
    to apply.

    There can be many different reasons you might have for choosing to apply
    security. For example:

    - protecting the maintainability of the data or application. (I.e.
    preventing casual or inadvertent changes.)

    - protecting the intellectual property represented by the application
    itself.

    - protecting highly sensitive or classified information.

    No security should be considered absolute. Typically, the level of
    protection needs to be considered in relation to the value of the asset
    being protected. (As you said "At some point it doesnt become worth my
    time".) Security is probably good enough if unauthorized access to the
    asset is not worth the trouble.

    The level of protection should also be considered in relation to all of
    the other "technologi es" that give access to the asset. For example,
    there is little point protecting a data source with retinal scanners if
    printouts of the protected data can be obtained from the trash bin in
    the alley, or if the information can be obtained by phoning someone in
    the organization. (Information security is first and foremost a
    "people" issue. Without the understanding and support of the people who
    work with the information, any "technologi cal" protection will be of
    little value.)

    After you have determined the level of security required, then you can
    think about what technology (and corporate culture) is required to
    support it. It may be that no protection is required. Or perhaps a
    password protected Access DB on the internet is good enough. Or it may
    be that you need something much stronger, on an isolated network in an
    electronically impervious environment.

    In the case of your MDB, I guess that security was not one of the design
    considerations. That may be an indication that the value of the asset
    is small (in which case the need for protection will also be small) but
    I would advise confirming this with the "owners" of the asset.

    Cheers,
    Randy


    Miro wrote:
    [color=blue]
    > Why Password protect an MDB when someone can google and get a hack?
    >
    > Wondering if anyone else has thought of this and just said "oh well"...
    >
    > I plan to password protect an MDB where I have some system/program variables
    > and data.
    >
    > But looking in google, there are plenty of programs a user can download to
    > hack and crack that password.
    >
    > So Im assuming... let the hacks and cracks be, do the MDB and if someone
    > really wants to see some system
    > varables ( such as last 10 logins ) and things like that...let them.
    >
    > I havn't read up on encryption yet and seen if that can be reversed as well.
    >
    > Just wondering for some simple ideas what others have done. At some point
    > it doesnt become worth my time
    > to lock it down, time wasted could be better spent somewhere else.
    >
    > Thanks,
    >
    > Miro
    >
    >[/color]

    Comment

    • Paul Clement

      #3
      Re: Password Protect

      On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 16:37:56 -0400, "Miro" <mironagy@golde n.net> wrote:

      ¤ Why Password protect an MDB when someone can google and get a hack?
      ¤
      ¤ Wondering if anyone else has thought of this and just said "oh well"...
      ¤
      ¤ I plan to password protect an MDB where I have some system/program variables
      ¤ and data.
      ¤
      ¤ But looking in google, there are plenty of programs a user can download to
      ¤ hack and crack that password.
      ¤
      ¤ So Im assuming... let the hacks and cracks be, do the MDB and if someone
      ¤ really wants to see some system
      ¤ varables ( such as last 10 logins ) and things like that...let them.
      ¤
      ¤ I havn't read up on encryption yet and seen if that can be reversed as well.
      ¤
      ¤ Just wondering for some simple ideas what others have done. At some point
      ¤ it doesnt become worth my time
      ¤ to lock it down, time wasted could be better spent somewhere else.

      If you really want to prevent someone from seeing the data in an Access database then I would
      encrypt it. There are plenty of encryption routines to choose from that will discourage just about
      anyone other than a diehard hacker, and even a diehard hacker won't waste his time unless the data
      is extremely sensitive.

      You can use a database password as well and that will keep most folks out. User-level security
      offers an improvement but it's a bit more complicated to implement. But neither of these measures
      should be the only line of defense if you're really concerned about your data becoming public.


      Paul
      ~~~~
      Microsoft MVP (Visual Basic)

      Comment

      • Miro

        #4
        Re: Password Protect

        Yes it was more for a learning thing.

        Im still learning Vb.net... so i write something...and then try to break it
        any way i can.
        Lately ive been playing with mdb files, and stumbled upon this.

        I considered encryption but again... you are right...the data isnt sensitive
        enough that I will be storing there.
        I just like to keep some things out of reach of users. :)

        Most of us have tried to hack a saved game or something to increase lifespan
        or lives or something.
        Same idea i was fiddling with. Not a big issue... just wondering more than
        anything - or if i was missing something in
        a db setup.

        Thanks,

        Miro



        "Paul Clement" <UseAdddressAtE ndofMessage@sws pectrum.com> wrote in message
        news:udii92p1q7 fgrl64heg2cdpnm 3g9kpt9sg@4ax.c om...[color=blue]
        > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 16:37:56 -0400, "Miro" <mironagy@golde n.net> wrote:
        >
        > ¤ Why Password protect an MDB when someone can google and get a hack?
        > ¤
        > ¤ Wondering if anyone else has thought of this and just said "oh well"...
        > ¤
        > ¤ I plan to password protect an MDB where I have some system/program
        > variables
        > ¤ and data.
        > ¤
        > ¤ But looking in google, there are plenty of programs a user can download
        > to
        > ¤ hack and crack that password.
        > ¤
        > ¤ So Im assuming... let the hacks and cracks be, do the MDB and if someone
        > ¤ really wants to see some system
        > ¤ varables ( such as last 10 logins ) and things like that...let them.
        > ¤
        > ¤ I havn't read up on encryption yet and seen if that can be reversed as
        > well.
        > ¤
        > ¤ Just wondering for some simple ideas what others have done. At some
        > point
        > ¤ it doesnt become worth my time
        > ¤ to lock it down, time wasted could be better spent somewhere else.
        >
        > If you really want to prevent someone from seeing the data in an Access
        > database then I would
        > encrypt it. There are plenty of encryption routines to choose from that
        > will discourage just about
        > anyone other than a diehard hacker, and even a diehard hacker won't waste
        > his time unless the data
        > is extremely sensitive.
        >
        > You can use a database password as well and that will keep most folks out.
        > User-level security
        > offers an improvement but it's a bit more complicated to implement. But
        > neither of these measures
        > should be the only line of defense if you're really concerned about your
        > data becoming public.
        >
        >
        > Paul
        > ~~~~
        > Microsoft MVP (Visual Basic)[/color]


        Comment

        Working...