BackgroundWorker and 'freezing' application

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Sebastian Crewe

    #1

    BackgroundWorker and 'freezing' application

    Greetings,

    I was much encouraged to see the new BackgroundWorke r class in .NET v2. On
    the face of it, much easier to use than the various delegates and events of
    yore, though I imagine the same base classes are being invoked.

    Anyway, I have given it a try with a VB.NET application that generates
    charts. Since there are some 3,000 charts to do, I wanted to put the chart
    generation on a separate thread. Works fine inasmuch as the charts are made.
    The problem is that the form UI is frozen after the job completes.
    Actually, I think it freezes at some point during the background job running
    but I haven't been able to determine if it is always after a fixed amount of
    time.

    For the first few minutes of background thread operation, I can move the
    form around, minimize it etc. I repeat this exercise from time to time; most
    often, the form is still responsive while othertimes it freezes. I am
    testing this on a dual CPU HP DC7100, XP Pro, SP2.

    I have treble-checked that nothing in the background thread touches the
    form. I use a separate SQL connection from that used for populating UI
    controls; I have taken the BackgroundWorke r1 object off the form design
    surface and declared it manually (WithEvents); I have commented out all
    ReportProgress calls (saw something on these perhaps being too frequent).

    At the end of the job, I pop up a message box to say all done. This is
    within the RunWorkerComple ted event. My understanding is that once this
    event fires, then the background thread is finished and control is
    automatically handed back to the UI thread. Is this correct?

    Any ideas as to why the form freezes gratefully received. Are there any
    tricks I can employ to determine at which point things are going wrong?

    Thanks and regards

    Sebastian Crewe
  • Carlos J. Quintero [VB MVP]

    #2
    Re: BackgroundWorke r and 'freezing' application

    Take a look at the basics here (the BackgroundWorke r class is a helper class
    added to .NET 2.0):

    Resources about asynchronous operations
    MZ-Tools has a single goal: To make your everyday programming life easier. As an add-in to several Integrated Development Environment (IDEs) from Microsoft, MZ-Tools adds new menus and toolbars to them that provide many new productivity features.


    --

    Best regards,

    Carlos J. Quintero

    MZ-Tools: Productivity add-ins for Visual Studio
    You can code, design and document much faster:
    MZ-Tools has a single goal: To make your everyday programming life easier. As an add-in to several Integrated Development Environment (IDEs) from Microsoft, MZ-Tools adds new menus and toolbars to them that provide many new productivity features.



    "Sebastian Crewe" <SebastianCrewe @discussions.mi crosoft.com> escribió en el
    mensaje news:38B6BB6F-393C-4332-A2F5-536A4D6E2BEE@mi crosoft.com...[color=blue]
    > Greetings,
    >
    > I was much encouraged to see the new BackgroundWorke r class in .NET v2.
    > On
    > the face of it, much easier to use than the various delegates and events
    > of
    > yore, though I imagine the same base classes are being invoked.
    >
    > Anyway, I have given it a try with a VB.NET application that generates
    > charts. Since there are some 3,000 charts to do, I wanted to put the
    > chart
    > generation on a separate thread. Works fine inasmuch as the charts are
    > made.
    > The problem is that the form UI is frozen after the job completes.
    > Actually, I think it freezes at some point during the background job
    > running
    > but I haven't been able to determine if it is always after a fixed amount
    > of
    > time.
    >
    > For the first few minutes of background thread operation, I can move the
    > form around, minimize it etc. I repeat this exercise from time to time;
    > most
    > often, the form is still responsive while othertimes it freezes. I am
    > testing this on a dual CPU HP DC7100, XP Pro, SP2.
    >
    > I have treble-checked that nothing in the background thread touches the
    > form. I use a separate SQL connection from that used for populating UI
    > controls; I have taken the BackgroundWorke r1 object off the form design
    > surface and declared it manually (WithEvents); I have commented out all
    > ReportProgress calls (saw something on these perhaps being too frequent).
    >
    > At the end of the job, I pop up a message box to say all done. This is
    > within the RunWorkerComple ted event. My understanding is that once this
    > event fires, then the background thread is finished and control is
    > automatically handed back to the UI thread. Is this correct?
    >
    > Any ideas as to why the form freezes gratefully received. Are there any
    > tricks I can employ to determine at which point things are going wrong?
    >
    > Thanks and regards
    >
    > Sebastian Crewe[/color]


    Comment

    • Sebastian Crewe

      #3
      Re: BackgroundWorke r and 'freezing' application

      Thank you for the quick reply. I have been through these and similar
      documentation. Most of the content is based on the underlying way of using a
      background thread, not with using the BackgroundWorke r class.

      I was hoping to avoid doing a rewrite, using delegates, BeginInvoke etc,
      since that is what the BackgroundWorke r class is supposed to help with. The
      problem remains of the user UI appearing to freeze; certainly it is
      unresponsive, eg to being moved around. Meanwhile, Task Manager shows 0% CPU
      for my application.

      My background thread works fine if the job to complete takes 5 minutes or
      less. I am not aware of a defualt timeout with background threads, but
      perhaps I need to give wake up calls to the user UI once in a while? Any
      guidelines for this? Is the fact that the PC has multi-processors something
      I should be dealing with explicitly?

      Thanks and regards

      Sebastian

      "Carlos J. Quintero [VB MVP]" wrote:
      [color=blue]
      > Take a look at the basics here (the BackgroundWorke r class is a helper class
      > added to .NET 2.0):
      >
      > Resources about asynchronous operations
      > http://www.mztools.com/resources_net...nousOperations
      >
      > --
      >
      > Best regards,
      >
      > Carlos J. Quintero
      >
      > MZ-Tools: Productivity add-ins for Visual Studio
      > You can code, design and document much faster:
      > http://www.mztools.com
      >
      >
      > "Sebastian Crewe" <SebastianCrewe @discussions.mi crosoft.com> escribió en el
      > mensaje news:38B6BB6F-393C-4332-A2F5-536A4D6E2BEE@mi crosoft.com...[color=green]
      > > Greetings,
      > >
      > > I was much encouraged to see the new BackgroundWorke r class in .NET v2.
      > > On
      > > the face of it, much easier to use than the various delegates and events
      > > of
      > > yore, though I imagine the same base classes are being invoked.
      > >
      > > Anyway, I have given it a try with a VB.NET application that generates
      > > charts. Since there are some 3,000 charts to do, I wanted to put the
      > > chart
      > > generation on a separate thread. Works fine inasmuch as the charts are
      > > made.
      > > The problem is that the form UI is frozen after the job completes.
      > > Actually, I think it freezes at some point during the background job
      > > running
      > > but I haven't been able to determine if it is always after a fixed amount
      > > of
      > > time.
      > >
      > > For the first few minutes of background thread operation, I can move the
      > > form around, minimize it etc. I repeat this exercise from time to time;
      > > most
      > > often, the form is still responsive while othertimes it freezes. I am
      > > testing this on a dual CPU HP DC7100, XP Pro, SP2.
      > >
      > > I have treble-checked that nothing in the background thread touches the
      > > form. I use a separate SQL connection from that used for populating UI
      > > controls; I have taken the BackgroundWorke r1 object off the form design
      > > surface and declared it manually (WithEvents); I have commented out all
      > > ReportProgress calls (saw something on these perhaps being too frequent).
      > >
      > > At the end of the job, I pop up a message box to say all done. This is
      > > within the RunWorkerComple ted event. My understanding is that once this
      > > event fires, then the background thread is finished and control is
      > > automatically handed back to the UI thread. Is this correct?
      > >
      > > Any ideas as to why the form freezes gratefully received. Are there any
      > > tricks I can employ to determine at which point things are going wrong?
      > >
      > > Thanks and regards
      > >
      > > Sebastian Crewe[/color]
      >
      >
      >[/color]

      Comment

      Working...