0 based collections

[Boni]

Dear all,
it is very confusing for me, some elements in VB are 0-base, i.e. arrays
others are 1 -based.
Is it possible to have 0 based .NET collections.
Is
dim col as collection
col alwasy 1 based?
Why the whole theater? Why not have all stuff 0 based?
Thanks,
Boni

[Cor Ligthert [MVP]]

Re: 0 based collections

Boni,

Visual Basic has in my opinion taken the right approach that counting start
at First. In my own natural language there is not even an equivalent for
Zero other than Null (nothing).

However, it seems that developers (like me) want to stick on machine code
and use therefore the Zero as first counting position. (Counting starting in
most current cultures with our fingers, from which we have normally when we
are born ten).

However, almost every collection and array in VBNet starts at Zero, with the
exception with the one, which you should in my opinion avoid, the
VB.Collection. If you don't need that for a kind of upgrading than don't use
it. (Although it is an official Net element not a compatible element).

A in my personal opinion strange behaviour from VBNet is, that when you
create an array (and only with that). There is created one extra element.
And therefore when you want an array of 1 element you have to say.

dim mystring(0) as String ' Which is an array of 1 elements.

(It is for those who want to use the "First" element as starting indexer).

I hope this gives an idea.

Cor

[Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]]

Re: 0 based collections

"Boni" <oilia@nospam > schrieb:[color=blue]
> it is very confusing for me, some elements in VB are 0-base, i.e. arrays
> others are 1 -based.
> Is it possible to have 0 based .NET collections.[/color]

Yes (see below).
[color=blue]
> Is
> dim col as collection
> col alwasy 1 based?[/color]

Yes.
[color=blue]
> Why the whole theater? Why not have all stuff 0 based?[/color]

The 'Collection' class works similar to the VB6 'Collection' class. If you
want a 0-based collection, take a look at the classes in the
'System.Collect ions' namespace, in particular 'Hashtable' and 'ArrayList'.

--
M S Herfried K. Wagner
M V P <URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/>
V B <URL:http://classicvb.org/petition/>

[Boni]

Re: 0 based collections

> The 'Collection' class works similar to the VB6 'Collection' class. If[color=blue]
> you want a 0-based collection, take a look at the classes in the
> 'System.Collect ions' namespace, in particular 'Hashtable' and 'ArrayList'.[/color]
ok. Thanks.
How is it done in C#? Is System.collecti on also starting with 1 there?

[Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]]

Re: 0 based collections

"Boni" <oilia@nospam > schrieb:[color=blue][color=green]
>> The 'Collection' class works similar to the VB6 'Collection' class. If
>> you want a 0-based collection, take a look at the classes in the
>> 'System.Collect ions' namespace, in particular 'Hashtable' and
>> 'ArrayList'.[/color]
>
> How is it done in C#? Is System.collecti on also starting with 1 there?[/color]

The collection classes in 'System.Collect ions' are /always/ 0-based, VB's
own collection is /always/ 1-based.

--
M S Herfried K. Wagner
M V P <URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/>
V B <URL:http://classicvb.org/petition/>

[Mick Doherty]

Re: 0 based collections

Microsoft.Visua lBasic.Collecti on is not normally used in C#.
This has been added for VBClassic migrators who were used to using VB's 1
based collection object.

Try to use one of the collection classes from the System.Collecti ons
namespace instead. I believe they are better optimised than the
Microsoft.Visua lBasic.Collecti on.

--
Mick Doherty

http://dotnetrix.co.uk/nothing.html

"Boni" <oilia@nospam > wrote in message
news:uwCeU$ugFH A.3448@TK2MSFTN GP12.phx.gbl...[color=blue][color=green]
>> The 'Collection' class works similar to the VB6 'Collection' class. If
>> you want a 0-based collection, take a look at the classes in the
>> 'System.Collect ions' namespace, in particular 'Hashtable' and
>> 'ArrayList'.[/color]
> ok. Thanks.
> How is it done in C#? Is System.collecti on also starting with 1 there?
>[/color]