Data Persistence

[Keith]

Hi all

I'm looking into persisting data for the life of an application.

Can anyone enlighten me as to which would produce the least memory overhead;

i) Storing dataset objects in a hashtable

ii) Storing the datasets as xml files and reloading them into memory

Cheers

Keith

[Ken Tucker [MVP]]

Re: Data Persistence

Hi,

You can store more than one table in a dataset. I would store the
dataset as xml.

Ken
---------------
"Keith" <keith.wilson@b owe.co.uk> wrote in message
news:cvmsdb$c5k $1@titan.btinte rnet.com...
Hi all

I'm looking into persisting data for the life of an application.

Can anyone enlighten me as to which would produce the least memory overhead;

i) Storing dataset objects in a hashtable

ii) Storing the datasets as xml files and reloading them into memory

Cheers

Keith

[Cor Ligthert]

Re: Data Persistence

Keith,

For what kind of application, Webform or windowsform.

(I see not the need for a windowsform so when it is that, than maybe can you
explain why you want to do that. The persistentie from a dataset is the same
as from an hashtable or whatever)

Cor

[Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]]

Re: Data Persistence

"Keith" <keith.wilson@b owe.co.uk> schrieb:[color=blue]
> I'm looking into persisting data for the life of an application.
>
> Can anyone enlighten me as to which would produce the least memory
> overhead;
>
> i) Storing dataset objects in a hashtable
>
> ii) Storing the datasets as xml files and reloading them into memory[/color]

I think these two options serve different purposes. Storing data in a
hashtable doesn't make it persistent, storing it in an XML file does.

--
M S Herfried K. Wagner
M V P <URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/>
V B <URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/dotnet/faqs/>