Re: A test about searching in a String I promised Jay B.
Herfried,
It is not important anymore, I tested it in a discussion, and the difference
is really high.
So now I am a fan from stringbuilder too,
I even know the reference to it withouth thinking.
:-))
But in the test I program, I did send in Friday I used in too.
With that I make automatic very fast strings from 10Mb or more and without
RSI.
I had expected an reaction from you, because with that test is shown, that
the microsoft.visua l basic function "Instr" is twice as fast as the net
member "indexof", I had expect a reaction from you, but it was not.
It proves that a lot of people who talks about slower, or people like me who
say equeal, are wrong.
Cor
Herfried,
It is not important anymore, I tested it in a discussion, and the difference
is really high.
So now I am a fan from stringbuilder too,
I even know the reference to it withouth thinking.
:-))
But in the test I program, I did send in Friday I used in too.
With that I make automatic very fast strings from 10Mb or more and without
RSI.
I had expected an reaction from you, because with that test is shown, that
the microsoft.visua l basic function "Instr" is twice as fast as the net
member "indexof", I had expect a reaction from you, but it was not.
It proves that a lot of people who talks about slower, or people like me who
say equeal, are wrong.
Cor
Comment