![One Handed Man [ OHM ]](./core/images/default/default_avatar_large.png "One Handed Man [ OHM ]"){kind=avatar}
This has been reported in several articles
-
-
Re: Microsoft to Drop .NET name
Hello,
"One Handed Man [ OHM ]" <terry_burnsREM OVE%FOR%NO%SPAM @BTOpenworld.co m>
schrieb:[color=blue]
> This has been reported in several articles
>
> http://www.destinationcrm.com/articl...ArticleID=2894[/color]
<quote>
Another reason for the change, Davis says, is the .NET aspect of the
operating system is not the primary selling point.
</quote>
Microsoft won't drop the name .NET everywhere...
--
Herfried K. Wagner
MVP · VB Classic, VB.NET
-
Re: Microsoft to Drop .NET name
In another article, it is suggested that applications which were once
described as ApplicationName 'For Windows' had the 'For Windows' dropped
leaving just ApplicationName , and that the other product names would also
have the .NET dropped eventually also. I don't know how they are going to
manage this because they still need to differentiate between VB Classic and
VB.NET for example.
I hope its not too soon as I have just registered a company and domain using
the .NET extension.
Lets see, but in any case, change always comes, and eventually we die.
;-D
"Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]" <hirf.nosp@m.ac tivevb.de> wrote in message
news:ukFKPCeeDH A.3528@tk2msftn gp13.phx.gbl...[color=blue]
> Hello,
>
> "One Handed Man [ OHM ]" <terry_burnsREM OVE%FOR%NO%SPAM @BTOpenworld.co m>
> schrieb:[color=green]
> > This has been reported in several articles
> >
> > http://www.destinationcrm.com/articl...ArticleID=2894[/color]
>
> <quote>
> Another reason for the change, Davis says, is the .NET aspect of the
> operating system is not the primary selling point.
> </quote>
>
> Microsoft won't drop the name .NET everywhere...
>
> --
> Herfried K. Wagner
> MVP · VB Classic, VB.NET
> http://www.mvps.org/dotnet
>
>[/color]
Comment
-
Re: Microsoft to Drop .NET name
Are you sure
For a = 2 to 99
Framework 20(a)
next
:-))
Comment
-
Re: Microsoft to Drop .NET name
What the &*^$ . . . . ???????
"Cor" <non@non.com> wrote in message
news:3f6306d5$0 $1061$48b97d01@ reader20.wxs.nl ...[color=blue]
> Are you sure
> For a = 2 to 99
> Framework 20(a)
> next
> :-))
>
>[/color]
Comment
-
Re: Microsoft to Drop .NET name
OHT
Will the framework name not be .net 1.0, .net1.1
but
framework 2002
framework 2003?
I thouht you would understand that OHT?
Cor
Comment
-
Re: Microsoft to Drop .NET name
OHT=OHM
Comment
-
Re: Microsoft to Drop .NET name
Hello,
"Cor" <non@non.com> schrieb:[color=blue]
> Will the framework name not be .net 1.0, .net1.1
> but
> framework 2002
> framework 2003?
> I thouht you would understand that OHT?[/color]
The Framework is numbered 1.0, 1.1, 2.0, ..., not Framework 2002 and
Framework 2003.
--
Herfried K. Wagner
MVP · VB Classic, VB.NET
Comment
-
Re: Microsoft to Drop .NET name
Herfried,
I know but I was refering to the article about disapearing from the name
Net.
I know without a reference anymore.
:-)
Cor
Comment
-
Re: Microsoft to Drop .NET name
Thanks for the newsflash! This decision was made many moths ago. As others
have said in this thread, the .NET aspect of the Windows Server 2003 OS is
not the major selling point, so it may make sense to drop the .NET from the
name. So, we'll probably not see SQL Server.NET or MS Exchange.NET or
BizTalk Server.NET.
I doubt .NET will get dropped from VS.NET or VB.NET since .NET is the major
focus of those products.
"One Handed Man [ OHM ]" <terry_burnsREM OVE%FOR%NO%SPAM @BTOpenworld.co m>
wrote in message news:O2FCxcdeDH A.1700@TK2MSFTN GP10.phx.gbl...[color=blue]
> This has been reported in several articles
>
> http://www.destinationcrm.com/articl...ArticleID=2894
>
>[/color]
Comment
-
Re: Microsoft to Drop .NET name
It must be great to be you, so informed, so early ! <envious>
If the news was so old to you, why read it ?
;-|
"Scott M." <s-mar@badspamsnet .net> wrote in message
news:O4JC4jgeDH A.1748@TK2MSFTN GP10.phx.gbl...[color=blue]
> Thanks for the newsflash! This decision was made many moths ago. As[/color]
others[color=blue]
> have said in this thread, the .NET aspect of the Windows Server 2003 OS is
> not the major selling point, so it may make sense to drop the .NET from[/color]
the[color=blue]
> name. So, we'll probably not see SQL Server.NET or MS Exchange.NET or
> BizTalk Server.NET.
>
> I doubt .NET will get dropped from VS.NET or VB.NET since .NET is the[/color]
major[color=blue]
> focus of those products.
>
>
> "One Handed Man [ OHM ]" <terry_burnsREM OVE%FOR%NO%SPAM @BTOpenworld.co m>
> wrote in message news:O2FCxcdeDH A.1700@TK2MSFTN GP10.phx.gbl...[color=green]
> > This has been reported in several articles
> >
> > http://www.destinationcrm.com/articl...ArticleID=2894
> >
> >[/color]
>
>[/color]
Comment
-
Re: Microsoft to Drop .NET name
Hello,
"One Handed Man [ OHM ]" <terry_burnsREM OVE%FOR%NO%SPAM @BTOpenworld.co m>
schrieb:[color=blue]
> It must be great to be you, so informed, so early ! <envious>
>
> If the news was so old to you, why read it ?
>
> ;-|[/color]
I remember I read the story about the ".NET" in product names some
months/weeks before Windows 2003 was released.
--
Herfried K. Wagner
MVP · VB Classic, VB.NET
Comment
-
Re: Microsoft to Drop .NET name
Pretty old news, if you don't mind my saying so.
Tom Dacon
"One Handed Man [ OHM ]" <terry_burnsREM OVE%FOR%NO%SPAM @BTOpenworld.co m>
wrote in message news:O2FCxcdeDH A.1700@TK2MSFTN GP10.phx.gbl...[color=blue]
> This has been reported in several articles
>
> http://www.destinationcrm.com/articl...ArticleID=2894
>
>[/color]
Comment
-
Re: Microsoft to Drop .NET name
Well what I've heard is that they dropped .NET from Server 2003 because it
made it sound like it was written in .NET.
Microsoft Windows .NET
or Microsoft Windows 2003, with .NET technology...
Let's all write an OS in VB.NET, using System.Reflecti on. Hurrah!!
--
HTH,
-- Tom Spink, Über Geek
Please respond to the newsgroup,
so all can benefit
"Maybe it's a game called 'Punish the User'"
"Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]" <hirf.nosp@m.ac tivevb.de> wrote in message
news:##s3AYheDH A.4024@TK2MSFTN GP11.phx.gbl...
: Hello,
:
: "One Handed Man [ OHM ]" <terry_burnsREM OVE%FOR%NO%SPAM @BTOpenworld.co m>
: schrieb:
: > It must be great to be you, so informed, so early ! <envious>
: >
: > If the news was so old to you, why read it ?
: >
: > ;-|
:
: I remember I read the story about the ".NET" in product names some
: months/weeks before Windows 2003 was released.
:
: --
: Herfried K. Wagner
: MVP · VB Classic, VB.NET
: http://www.mvps.org/dotnet
:
:
Comment
-
Re: Microsoft to Drop .NET name
Because I thought it was something that I had not yet heard. This is how
"wonderful" me stays informed. :)
"One Handed Man [ OHM ]" <terry_burnsREM OVE%FOR%NO%SPAM @BTOpenworld.co m>
wrote in message news:%23OwRfKhe DHA.460@TK2MSFT NGP12.phx.gbl.. .[color=blue]
> It must be great to be you, so informed, so early ! <envious>
>
> If the news was so old to you, why read it ?
>
> ;-|
>
>
>
> "Scott M." <s-mar@badspamsnet .net> wrote in message
> news:O4JC4jgeDH A.1748@TK2MSFTN GP10.phx.gbl...[color=green]
> > Thanks for the newsflash! This decision was made many moths ago. As[/color]
> others[color=green]
> > have said in this thread, the .NET aspect of the Windows Server 2003 OS[/color][/color]
is[color=blue][color=green]
> > not the major selling point, so it may make sense to drop the .NET from[/color]
> the[color=green]
> > name. So, we'll probably not see SQL Server.NET or MS Exchange.NET or
> > BizTalk Server.NET.
> >
> > I doubt .NET will get dropped from VS.NET or VB.NET since .NET is the[/color]
> major[color=green]
> > focus of those products.
> >
> >
> > "One Handed Man [ OHM ]" <terry_burnsREM OVE%FOR%NO%SPAM @BTOpenworld.co m>
> > wrote in message news:O2FCxcdeDH A.1700@TK2MSFTN GP10.phx.gbl...[color=darkred]
> > > This has been reported in several articles
> > >
> > > http://www.destinationcrm.com/articl...ArticleID=2894
> > >
> > >[/color]
> >
> >[/color]
>
>[/color]
Comment
Comment