SET NO_BROWSETABLE ON ?

**Bob Barrows [MVP]** · Aug 29 '07, 02:55 PM

Re: SET NO_BROWSETABLE ON ?

raymond_b_jimen ez@yahoo.com wrote:

I've noticed in my .NET application (with ADO)

Classic ADO? I.E., with ADODB?
or ADO.Net?

I was going to paste in my standard "dotnet" reply, but I just noticed
that you crossposted to some dotnet groups. You need to be aware that
classic (non-dotnet) ado and ado.net are two very different things. This
question is off-topic in one of the ado groups you included in your
crosspost. It is also off-topic in the sqlserver.serve r group. Since I
am posting via msnews, this reply will not likely make it to the comp
group. When you follow up to this, please remove the off-topic groups
from your post.

that whenever a query
is done to SQL Server, a query executing
SET NO_BROWSETABLE ON
is done before.
This has an huge impact on performance, as the round-trip to the
server takes the same time as the correct query. I believe that if
"SET NO_BROWSETABLE ON" wasn't executed, performance would almost
double and network traffic would be reduced.
I've tried to find a reasonable answer on the net for this, but
haven't managed. Has someone noticed this and knows how to correct it?

I've never noticed this, but i am sure the technique used to execute
your queries might have something to do with it. Be sure to post a small
repro script to whichever group you follow up with

--
Microsoft MVP -- ASP/ASP.NET
Please reply to the newsgroup. The email account listed in my From
header is my spam trap, so I don't check it very often. You will get a
quicker response by posting to the newsgroup.

**Bob Barrows [MVP]** · Aug 29 '07, 03:05 PM

Re: SET NO_BROWSETABLE ON ?

raymond_b_jimen ez@yahoo.com wrote:

I've noticed in my .NET application (with ADO) that whenever a query
is done to SQL Server, a query executing
SET NO_BROWSETABLE ON
is done before.
This has an huge impact on performance, as the round-trip to the
server takes the same time as the correct query. I believe that if
"SET NO_BROWSETABLE ON" wasn't executed, performance would almost
double and network traffic would be reduced.
I've tried to find a reasonable answer on the net for this, but
haven't managed. Has someone noticed this and knows how to correct it?
>

This may help:

http://www.vsj.co.uk/dotnet/display.asp?id=249

--
Microsoft MVP -- ASP/ASP.NET
Please reply to the newsgroup. The email account listed in my From
header is my spam trap, so I don't check it very often. You will get a
quicker response by posting to the newsgroup.

**Erland Sommarskog** · Aug 29 '07, 09:45 PM

Re: SET NO_BROWSETABLE ON ?

(raymond_b_jime nez@yahoo.com) writes:

I've noticed in my .NET application (with ADO) that whenever a query
is done to SQL Server, a query executing
SET NO_BROWSETABLE ON
is done before.
This has an huge impact on performance, as the round-trip to the
server takes the same time as the correct query. I believe that if
"SET NO_BROWSETABLE ON" wasn't executed, performance would almost
double and network traffic would be reduced.
I've tried to find a reasonable answer on the net for this, but
haven't managed. Has someone noticed this and knows how to correct it?

Which .Net Data provider do you use?

ADO (the one is not worthy to be called Classic, but which is not .Net)
spits this out, and it is about impossible to stop.

SqlClient does not send this by default, if you use CommandBehaviou r.KeyInfo
it does.

--
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esquel@sommarsk og.se

Books Online for SQL Server 2005 at

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2005/downloads/books.mspx

Books Online for SQL Server 2000 at

http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinfo/previousversions/books.mspx

**raymond_b_jimenez@yahoo.com** · Sep 14 '07, 02:35 PM

Re: SET NO_BROWSETABLE ON ?

On 29 Ago, 22:38, Erland Sommarskog <esq...@sommars kog.sewrote:

>
SqlClient does not send this by default, if you use CommandBehaviou r.KeyInfo
it does.
>

For all the docs I've seen till now, KeyInfo really seems like the
most interesting option. A couple of remarks:
1-I use an ExecuteReader with no parameters, so no CommandBehavior is
being used.
2-I do not see any "SET FMTONLY OFF" being executed, despite some
people complaining about that on the net. If one sees

CommandBehavior Enum (System.Data)

http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.data.commandbehavior.aspx

Provides a description of the results of the query and its effect on the database.

it would also be appearing in my case.

I'm now looking into the SqlCommand and SQLConnection classes to see
if something can make the "SET NO_BROWSETABLE ON" disappear. Anyone
got a clue?

rj

**Erland Sommarskog** · Sep 14 '07, 09:25 PM

Re: SET NO_BROWSETABLE ON ?

(raymond_b_jime nez@yahoo.com) writes:

For all the docs I've seen till now, KeyInfo really seems like the
most interesting option. A couple of remarks:
1-I use an ExecuteReader with no parameters, so no CommandBehavior is
being used.
2-I do not see any "SET FMTONLY OFF" being executed, despite some
people complaining about that on the net. If one sees

CommandBehavior Enum (System.Data)

http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.data.commandbehavior.aspx

Provides a description of the results of the query and its effect on the database.

it would also be appearing in my case.
>
I'm now looking into the SqlCommand and SQLConnection classes to see
if something can make the "SET NO_BROWSETABLE ON" disappear. Anyone
got a clue?

Since I don't see SET NO_BROWSETTABLE ON in my test setup, it's a bit
difficult to advice. Maybe you can post a sample program which produces
the dreaded NO_BROWSETABLE? Preferrably this should be a simple
command-line program without GUI.

--
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esquel@sommarsk og.se

Books Online for SQL Server 2005 at

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2005/downloads/books.mspx

Books Online for SQL Server 2000 at

http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinfo/previousversions/books.mspx

**raymond_b_jimenez@yahoo.com** · Sep 24 '07, 03:25 PM

Re: SET NO_BROWSETABLE ON ?

There is some hope... I've put my code in a new test environment, and
it does not issue "SET NO_BROWSETABLE ON". I've debugged the situation
further, and found some interesting differences doing some networking
debugging (using Wireshark):

-When I connect in the production environment, the one that gets "SET
NO_BROWSETABLE ON", the "App Name" is set to "Microsoft (R) .Net
Framework" and "Library Name" is set to OLEDB
-When I connect in the testing environment, both "App Name" and
"Library Name" are set to ".Net SqlClient Data Provider".

The "App Name" that appears in Wireshark is the same that appears in
SQL Profiler.

An adapted code example follows:
-----------------------------------------
Dim SQLConx As SqlConnection = New SqlConnection
Dim SQLCom As SqlCommand = New SqlCommand
Dim SQLDR As SqlDataReader

Try
SQLCom.Connecti on = SQLConx
SQLCom.CommandT ype = System.Data.Com mandType.Stored Procedure
SQLCom.CommandT ext = "myStoredProced ure"
SQLCom.Paramete rs.Add("@param" , _param)
SQLConx.Connect ionString = SQLConnectionSt ring
SQLConx.Open()
SQLDR = SQLCom.ExecuteR eader()
SQLConx.Close()
Catch exc As Exception
-----------------------------------------

What's stranger is the OLEDB reference. I'm not using it in my code,
but it appears in the network trace. What might I be missing?

rj

**Erland Sommarskog** · Sep 24 '07, 10:25 PM

Re: SET NO_BROWSETABLE ON ?

(raymond_b_jime nez@yahoo.com) writes:

-When I connect in the production environment, the one that gets "SET
NO_BROWSETABLE ON", the "App Name" is set to "Microsoft (R) .Net
Framework" and "Library Name" is set to OLEDB

Apparently you are using OleDbConnection etc in production. With OleDb
Client you may experience NO_BROWSETABLE more often.

--
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esquel@sommarsk og.se

Books Online for SQL Server 2005 at

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2005/downloads/books.mspx

Books Online for SQL Server 2000 at

http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinfo/previousversions/books.mspx

SET NO_BROWSETABLE ON ?

SET NO_BROWSETABLE ON ?

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment