RAM

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ellen K.

    RAM

    Is it true that SQL Server Standard edition can only use 2 GB of RAM?

    If so, and the box has more, does that mean the excess WILL be
    available for the O/S and any other apps?
  • GL

    #2
    Re: RAM

    You are correct

    (assuming we are talking about SQL server 2000 standard edition)

    GL

    "Ellen K." <72322.enno.ess peeayem.1016@co mpuserve.com> wrote in message
    news:ia8d805t3v p4c3riv2hfnfgaa 3ubhk0nvp@4ax.c om...[color=blue]
    > Is it true that SQL Server Standard edition can only use 2 GB of RAM?
    >
    > If so, and the box has more, does that mean the excess WILL be
    > available for the O/S and any other apps?[/color]


    Comment

    • Ellen K.

      #3
      Re: RAM

      Thanks.

      On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 11:01:28 -0700, "GL"
      <GL@noSpam.Repl yToNewsgroup.co m> wrote:
      [color=blue]
      >You are correct
      >
      >(assuming we are talking about SQL server 2000 standard edition)
      >
      >GL
      >
      >"Ellen K." <72322.enno.ess peeayem.1016@co mpuserve.com> wrote in message
      >news:ia8d805t3 vp4c3riv2hfnfga a3ubhk0nvp@4ax. com...[color=green]
      >> Is it true that SQL Server Standard edition can only use 2 GB of RAM?
      >>
      >> If so, and the box has more, does that mean the excess WILL be
      >> available for the O/S and any other apps?[/color]
      >[/color]

      Comment

      • Ellen K.

        #4
        Re: RAM

        I didn't know the O/S itself limits us to 4 GB, that is very important
        information, thank you. But at least if the 2 GB that SQL Server
        can't use WILL be used by the O/S, we are probably good.

        On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 15:41:22 -0400, "Daniel A. Thomas"
        <dathomas@--spam--istar.ca> wrote:
        [color=blue]
        >
        >"Ellen K." <72322.enno.ess peeayem.1016@co mpuserve.com> wrote in message
        >news:ia8d805t3 vp4c3riv2hfnfga a3ubhk0nvp@4ax. com...
        >| Is it true that SQL Server Standard edition can only use 2 GB of RAM?
        >|
        >| If so, and the box has more, does that mean the excess WILL be
        >| available for the O/S and any other apps?
        >
        >
        >Keep your OS specifications in mind when choosing your version of SQL
        >Server. For example, Windows Server 2000 / 2003 Standard Edition has the
        >following memory specifications:
        >
        >Support for up to 4GB of memory. Of that 4GB, the operating system always
        >reserves anything above 2GB for its own use. This allows applications
        >on the server to share a maximum of 2GB.
        >
        >Dan Thomas[/color]

        Comment

        • GL

          #5
          Re: RAM

          If you move to Windows 2003 Server, those memory limits are raised...

          See this MS page for more info on Windows Server 2003 specs:


          GL

          "Ellen K." <72322.enno.ess peeayem.1016@co mpuserve.com> wrote in message
          news:7grf80d6v6 pbnfb966q8ak5ib 2ab7pq1ou@4ax.c om...[color=blue]
          > I didn't know the O/S itself limits us to 4 GB, that is very important
          > information, thank you. But at least if the 2 GB that SQL Server
          > can't use WILL be used by the O/S, we are probably good.
          >
          > On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 15:41:22 -0400, "Daniel A. Thomas"
          > <dathomas@--spam--istar.ca> wrote:
          >[color=green]
          > >
          > >"Ellen K." <72322.enno.ess peeayem.1016@co mpuserve.com> wrote in message
          > >news:ia8d805t3 vp4c3riv2hfnfga a3ubhk0nvp@4ax. com...
          > >| Is it true that SQL Server Standard edition can only use 2 GB of RAM?
          > >|
          > >| If so, and the box has more, does that mean the excess WILL be
          > >| available for the O/S and any other apps?
          > >
          > >
          > >Keep your OS specifications in mind when choosing your version of SQL
          > >Server. For example, Windows Server 2000 / 2003 Standard Edition has the
          > >following memory specifications:
          > >
          > >Support for up to 4GB of memory. Of that 4GB, the operating system always
          > >reserves anything above 2GB for its own use. This allows applications
          > >on the server to share a maximum of 2GB.
          > >
          > >Dan Thomas[/color]
          >[/color]


          Comment

          • Daniel A. Thomas

            #6
            Re: RAM


            "Ellen K." <72322.enno.ess peeayem.1016@co mpuserve.com> wrote in message
            news:ia8d805t3v p4c3riv2hfnfgaa 3ubhk0nvp@4ax.c om...
            | Is it true that SQL Server Standard edition can only use 2 GB of RAM?
            |
            | If so, and the box has more, does that mean the excess WILL be
            | available for the O/S and any other apps?


            Keep your OS specifications in mind when choosing your version of SQL
            Server. For example, Windows Server 2000 / 2003 Standard Edition has the
            following memory specifications:

            Support for up to 4GB of memory. Of that 4GB, the operating system always
            reserves anything above 2GB for its own use. This allows applications
            on the server to share a maximum of 2GB.

            Dan Thomas

            Comment

            • Ellen K.

              #7
              Re: RAM

              That page still shows 4 GB for the Standard Edition, but it's a good
              reference, thanks. :)

              I think we will be fine with 4 GB.

              On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 10:19:17 -0700, "GL"
              <GL@noSpam.Repl yToNewsgroup.co m> wrote:
              [color=blue]
              >If you move to Windows 2003 Server, those memory limits are raised...
              >
              >See this MS page for more info on Windows Server 2003 specs:
              >http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserv...eeditions.mspx
              >
              >GL
              >
              >"Ellen K." <72322.enno.ess peeayem.1016@co mpuserve.com> wrote in message
              >news:7grf80d6v 6pbnfb966q8ak5i b2ab7pq1ou@4ax. com...[color=green]
              >> I didn't know the O/S itself limits us to 4 GB, that is very important
              >> information, thank you. But at least if the 2 GB that SQL Server
              >> can't use WILL be used by the O/S, we are probably good.
              >>
              >> On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 15:41:22 -0400, "Daniel A. Thomas"
              >> <dathomas@--spam--istar.ca> wrote:
              >>[color=darkred]
              >> >
              >> >"Ellen K." <72322.enno.ess peeayem.1016@co mpuserve.com> wrote in message
              >> >news:ia8d805t3 vp4c3riv2hfnfga a3ubhk0nvp@4ax. com...
              >> >| Is it true that SQL Server Standard edition can only use 2 GB of RAM?
              >> >|
              >> >| If so, and the box has more, does that mean the excess WILL be
              >> >| available for the O/S and any other apps?
              >> >
              >> >
              >> >Keep your OS specifications in mind when choosing your version of SQL
              >> >Server. For example, Windows Server 2000 / 2003 Standard Edition has the
              >> >following memory specifications:
              >> >
              >> >Support for up to 4GB of memory. Of that 4GB, the operating system always
              >> >reserves anything above 2GB for its own use. This allows applications
              >> >on the server to share a maximum of 2GB.
              >> >
              >> >Dan Thomas[/color]
              >>[/color]
              >[/color]

              Comment

              • Ellen K.

                #8
                Re: RAM

                Thanks.

                On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 11:01:28 -0700, "GL"
                <GL@noSpam.Repl yToNewsgroup.co m> wrote:
                [color=blue]
                >You are correct
                >
                >(assuming we are talking about SQL server 2000 standard edition)
                >
                >GL
                >
                >"Ellen K." <72322.enno.ess peeayem.1016@co mpuserve.com> wrote in message
                >news:ia8d805t3 vp4c3riv2hfnfga a3ubhk0nvp@4ax. com...[color=green]
                >> Is it true that SQL Server Standard edition can only use 2 GB of RAM?
                >>
                >> If so, and the box has more, does that mean the excess WILL be
                >> available for the O/S and any other apps?[/color]
                >[/color]

                Comment

                • Ellen K.

                  #9
                  Re: RAM

                  I didn't know the O/S itself limits us to 4 GB, that is very important
                  information, thank you. But at least if the 2 GB that SQL Server
                  can't use WILL be used by the O/S, we are probably good.

                  On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 15:41:22 -0400, "Daniel A. Thomas"
                  <dathomas@--spam--istar.ca> wrote:
                  [color=blue]
                  >
                  >"Ellen K." <72322.enno.ess peeayem.1016@co mpuserve.com> wrote in message
                  >news:ia8d805t3 vp4c3riv2hfnfga a3ubhk0nvp@4ax. com...
                  >| Is it true that SQL Server Standard edition can only use 2 GB of RAM?
                  >|
                  >| If so, and the box has more, does that mean the excess WILL be
                  >| available for the O/S and any other apps?
                  >
                  >
                  >Keep your OS specifications in mind when choosing your version of SQL
                  >Server. For example, Windows Server 2000 / 2003 Standard Edition has the
                  >following memory specifications:
                  >
                  >Support for up to 4GB of memory. Of that 4GB, the operating system always
                  >reserves anything above 2GB for its own use. This allows applications
                  >on the server to share a maximum of 2GB.
                  >
                  >Dan Thomas[/color]

                  Comment

                  • GL

                    #10
                    Re: RAM

                    If you move to Windows 2003 Server, those memory limits are raised...

                    See this MS page for more info on Windows Server 2003 specs:


                    GL

                    "Ellen K." <72322.enno.ess peeayem.1016@co mpuserve.com> wrote in message
                    news:7grf80d6v6 pbnfb966q8ak5ib 2ab7pq1ou@4ax.c om...[color=blue]
                    > I didn't know the O/S itself limits us to 4 GB, that is very important
                    > information, thank you. But at least if the 2 GB that SQL Server
                    > can't use WILL be used by the O/S, we are probably good.
                    >
                    > On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 15:41:22 -0400, "Daniel A. Thomas"
                    > <dathomas@--spam--istar.ca> wrote:
                    >[color=green]
                    > >
                    > >"Ellen K." <72322.enno.ess peeayem.1016@co mpuserve.com> wrote in message
                    > >news:ia8d805t3 vp4c3riv2hfnfga a3ubhk0nvp@4ax. com...
                    > >| Is it true that SQL Server Standard edition can only use 2 GB of RAM?
                    > >|
                    > >| If so, and the box has more, does that mean the excess WILL be
                    > >| available for the O/S and any other apps?
                    > >
                    > >
                    > >Keep your OS specifications in mind when choosing your version of SQL
                    > >Server. For example, Windows Server 2000 / 2003 Standard Edition has the
                    > >following memory specifications:
                    > >
                    > >Support for up to 4GB of memory. Of that 4GB, the operating system always
                    > >reserves anything above 2GB for its own use. This allows applications
                    > >on the server to share a maximum of 2GB.
                    > >
                    > >Dan Thomas[/color]
                    >[/color]


                    Comment

                    • Ellen K.

                      #11
                      Re: RAM

                      That page still shows 4 GB for the Standard Edition, but it's a good
                      reference, thanks. :)

                      I think we will be fine with 4 GB.

                      On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 10:19:17 -0700, "GL"
                      <GL@noSpam.Repl yToNewsgroup.co m> wrote:
                      [color=blue]
                      >If you move to Windows 2003 Server, those memory limits are raised...
                      >
                      >See this MS page for more info on Windows Server 2003 specs:
                      >http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserv...eeditions.mspx
                      >
                      >GL
                      >
                      >"Ellen K." <72322.enno.ess peeayem.1016@co mpuserve.com> wrote in message
                      >news:7grf80d6v 6pbnfb966q8ak5i b2ab7pq1ou@4ax. com...[color=green]
                      >> I didn't know the O/S itself limits us to 4 GB, that is very important
                      >> information, thank you. But at least if the 2 GB that SQL Server
                      >> can't use WILL be used by the O/S, we are probably good.
                      >>
                      >> On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 15:41:22 -0400, "Daniel A. Thomas"
                      >> <dathomas@--spam--istar.ca> wrote:
                      >>[color=darkred]
                      >> >
                      >> >"Ellen K." <72322.enno.ess peeayem.1016@co mpuserve.com> wrote in message
                      >> >news:ia8d805t3 vp4c3riv2hfnfga a3ubhk0nvp@4ax. com...
                      >> >| Is it true that SQL Server Standard edition can only use 2 GB of RAM?
                      >> >|
                      >> >| If so, and the box has more, does that mean the excess WILL be
                      >> >| available for the O/S and any other apps?
                      >> >
                      >> >
                      >> >Keep your OS specifications in mind when choosing your version of SQL
                      >> >Server. For example, Windows Server 2000 / 2003 Standard Edition has the
                      >> >following memory specifications:
                      >> >
                      >> >Support for up to 4GB of memory. Of that 4GB, the operating system always
                      >> >reserves anything above 2GB for its own use. This allows applications
                      >> >on the server to share a maximum of 2GB.
                      >> >
                      >> >Dan Thomas[/color]
                      >>[/color]
                      >[/color]

                      Comment

                      Working...