store documents in image field

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • switter

    store documents in image field

    I am creating a document management systems using asp. I have been
    researching the different ways of handling the documents such as using the
    file system and storing the path in the db, and actually storing the
    document in the db. I like the idea of storing it in the database much
    better because I can allow users to manage documents themselves (I already
    have the code in place to do it if I decide), having a central system with
    the ability to add my own document properties by adding fields to the table,
    security, and backups. I have found that most think it is better to store
    the path due to performance issues and the rate the db can grow. I have
    looked at our current system in access and we have a total of 4400 documents
    (of which probably 25% are in the database but don't actually exist anymore
    in the file system, one hangup about the file system) since 1988. This
    comes to about 300 documents added each year. The other thing is the issue
    with the size of the db. I don't see a whole lot of difference with this
    issue because it is going to take up space in your file system too, although
    the file system may be more efficient at storing them. I would say that 95%
    of our docs are under 1 mb in size and done in ms word.

    The last thing is using full-text search capabilities in SQL Server. I need
    to be able to search the contents of the field.

    Is there other issues around storing documents in the db to consider besides
    the above?


  • Mystery Man

    #2
    Re: store documents in image field

    Given your volumes, I dont see an issue with storing them in the
    database. It makes good sense.

    Obviously backing up and restoring databases take longer. I presume
    you are not using database replication? This is something to be aware
    of.

    Comment

    Working...