To throw or to throw not?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Emanuele D'Arrigo

    To throw or to throw not?

    I'm pondering on what is a bit of a philosophical dilemma.
    When should I throw an exception and when should I not?

    Suppose I have myFunc1() calling myFunc2() which in turn calls myFunc3
    ().
    Suppose myFunc3() has detected a problem. What should it do?

    Throw an exception, forcing myFunc2() to handle it and/or trigger
    another exception for myFunc1() to deal with? Or should it simply
    return a meaningful error code, for myFunc2() and myFunc1() to handle
    as an option but not forcing them to do so?

    Manu
  • Chris Rebert

    #2
    Re: To throw or to throw not?

    On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Emanuele D'Arrigo <manu3d@gmail.c omwrote:
    I'm pondering on what is a bit of a philosophical dilemma.
    When should I throw an exception and when should I not?
    >
    Suppose I have myFunc1() calling myFunc2() which in turn calls myFunc3
    ().
    Suppose myFunc3() has detected a problem. What should it do?
    >
    Throw an exception, forcing myFunc2() to handle it and/or trigger
    another exception for myFunc1() to deal with? Or should it simply
    return a meaningful error code, for myFunc2() and myFunc1() to handle
    as an option but not forcing them to do so?
    Depends on how serious the error is (e.g. str.find() returns -1 rather
    than raising an exception if it can't find the substring), but 98% of
    the time, you'll want to raise an exception; it's Pythonic, idiomatic,
    and expected. You'd have to have a *really* good reason to use an
    error value/code instead.
    Python is not C, and despite what Joel has said On Software, error
    codes generally suck.

    Cheers,
    Chris
    --
    Follow the path of the Iguana...

    Comment

    • Mensanator

      #3
      Re: To throw or to throw not?

      On Nov 13, 7:11 pm, "Emanuele D'Arrigo" <man...@gmail.c omwrote:
      I'm pondering on what is a bit of a philosophical dilemma.
      When should I throw an exception and when should I not?
      >
      Suppose I have myFunc1() calling myFunc2() which in turn calls myFunc3
      ().
      Suppose myFunc3() has detected a problem. What should it do?
      >
      Throw an exception, forcing myFunc2() to handle it and/or trigger
      another exception for myFunc1() to deal with? Or should it simply
      return a meaningful error code, for myFunc2() and myFunc1() to handle
      as an option but not forcing them to do so?
      That depends on the situation, doesn't it?

      For example, if I want to solve a linear congruence

      X*a == Z (mod Y)

      all I have to do is check that GCD(X,Y) divides Z and
      I can go ahead and call the solving function...

      ....which requires use of the modular inverse function
      which raises an exception if GCD(X,Y) is not 1 (even if
      it does divide Z).

      But wait! If, in fact, the GCD(X,Y)>1, and I already know
      that GCD(X,Y) divides Z, then it divides X, Y and Z, so
      I just divide each by GCD(X,Y) to make a new linear
      congruence where the modular inverse function will work
      and I'll get the right answer.

      The answer is that IF the exception can be handled without
      the calling function needing to know, then just handle it.
      Otherwise pass it back in case the calling function can
      figure out what to do.
      >
      Manu

      Comment

      • Steve Holden

        #4
        Re: To throw or to throw not?

        Emanuele D'Arrigo wrote:
        I'm pondering on what is a bit of a philosophical dilemma.
        When should I throw an exception and when should I not?
        >
        Suppose I have myFunc1() calling myFunc2() which in turn calls myFunc3
        ().
        Suppose myFunc3() has detected a problem. What should it do?
        >
        Throw an exception, forcing myFunc2() to handle it and/or trigger
        another exception for myFunc1() to deal with? Or should it simply
        return a meaningful error code, for myFunc2() and myFunc1() to handle
        as an option but not forcing them to do so?
        >
        Remember that with exceptions, if Func2 doesn't want to process the
        exception it doesn't have to do anything at all to have the exception
        re-raised: it simply doesn't trap the exception.

        regards
        Steve
        --
        Steve Holden +1 571 484 6266 +1 800 494 3119
        Holden Web LLC http://www.holdenweb.com/

        Comment

        • Steven D'Aprano

          #5
          Re: To throw or to throw not?

          On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:11:26 -0800, Emanuele D'Arrigo wrote:
          I'm pondering on what is a bit of a philosophical dilemma. When should I
          throw an exception and when should I not?
          >
          Suppose I have myFunc1() calling myFunc2() which in turn calls myFunc3
          ().
          Suppose myFunc3() has detected a problem. What should it do?
          >
          Throw an exception, forcing myFunc2() to handle it and/or trigger
          another exception for myFunc1() to deal with? Or should it simply return
          a meaningful error code, for myFunc2() and myFunc1() to handle as an
          option but not forcing them to do so?
          In general, you should raise an exception. Then if myFunc2() can't handle
          it, it doesn't need to trigger another exception, the exception will just
          propagate up the call chain to myFunc1().

          There are cases where something like a meaningful error value is
          appropriate, but the only one I can think of right now is NaN in floating
          point maths.


          --
          Steven

          Comment

          • Aaron Brady

            #6
            Re: To throw or to throw not?

            On Nov 13, 10:09 pm, Steven D'Aprano <st...@REMOVE-THIS-
            cybersource.com .auwrote:
            On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:11:26 -0800, Emanuele D'Arrigo wrote:
            I'm pondering on what is a bit of a philosophical dilemma. When should I
            throw an exception and when should I not?
            >
            Suppose I have myFunc1() calling myFunc2() which in turn calls myFunc3
            ().
            Suppose myFunc3() has detected a problem. What should it do?
            >
            Throw an exception, forcing myFunc2() to handle it and/or trigger
            another exception for myFunc1() to deal with? Or should it simply return
            a meaningful error code, for myFunc2() and myFunc1() to handle as an
            option but not forcing them to do so?
            >
            In general, you should raise an exception. Then if myFunc2() can't handle
            it, it doesn't need to trigger another exception, the exception will just
            propagate up the call chain to myFunc1().
            >
            There are cases where something like a meaningful error value is
            appropriate, but the only one I can think of right now is NaN in floating
            point maths.
            >
            --
            Steven
            If you need error flags, define them in a class:

            class ErrFlags:
            onlyInCorner= object( )
            livesOnCeiling= object( )

            def myFunc3( ):
            something( )
            return ErrFlags.onlyIn Corner

            def myFunc2( ):
            result= myFunc3( )
            if result is ErrFlags.onlyIn Corder:
            something
            elif result is ErrFlags.livesO nCeiling:
            something

            In some cases, you might want to call a method on the return object.

            I agree with the fellows earlier. Without further information,
            exceptions are generally nice and solid.

            Comment

            • Emanuele D'Arrigo

              #7
              Re: To throw or to throw not?

              Thank you all for the insightful replies! Much appreciated!

              Manu

              Comment

              Working...