Will Python 3 be "stackless"?

[Phillip B Oldham]

Will Python 3 be "stackless" ? Or, rather, will it have any features
similar to stackless' microthreads and channels?

[Chris Rebert]

Re: Will Python 3 be "stackless "?

On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Phillip B Oldham
<phillip.oldham @gmail.comwrote :

Will Python 3 be "stackless" ? Or, rather, will it have any features
similar to stackless' microthreads and channels?
--

http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

>

No, it will definitely not. But it does have the new multiprocessing
module: http://docs.python.org/library/multi...ultiprocessing

Cheers,
Chris
--
Follow the path of the Iguana...

http://rebertia.com

[Phillip B Oldham]

Re: Will Python 3 be &quot;stackless &quot;?

On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 9:20 PM, Chris Rebert <clp@rebertia.c omwrote:

No, it will definitely not.

>From your statement (and I'm terribly sorry if I've taken it out of

context) it would seem that such features are frowned-upon. Is this
correct? And if so, why?

--
Phillip B Oldham
phillip.oldham@ gmail.com
+44 (0) 7525 01 09 01

[Diez B. Roggisch]

Re: Will Python 3 be &quot;stackless &quot;?

Phillip B Oldham schrieb:

On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 9:20 PM, Chris Rebert <clp@rebertia.c omwrote:

>No, it will definitely not.

>

>>From your statement (and I'm terribly sorry if I've taken it out of

context) it would seem that such features are frowned-upon. Is this
correct? And if so, why?

You got the wrong impression. It's not frowned upon. It just is a lot of
extra effort to implemnt & thus makes the development of "normal"
features more complex.

Diez

[Terry Reedy]

Re: Will Python 3 be &quot;stackless &quot;?

Phillip B Oldham wrote:

Will Python 3 be ...

The features of Python 3.0 are fixed; there are just a few remaining
bugs to fix before the final release. Download the release candidate or
look at the online manual at

http://docs.python.org/dev/3.0/

[davy zhang]

Re: Will Python 3 be &quot;stackless &quot;?

multiprocessing is good enough for now,

On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 4:30 AM, Diez B. Roggisch <deets@nospam.w eb.dewrote:

Phillip B Oldham schrieb:

>>
>On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 9:20 PM, Chris Rebert <clp@rebertia.c omwrote:

>>>
>>No, it will definitely not.

>>

>>From your statement (and I'm terribly sorry if I've taken it out of

>>
>context) it would seem that such features are frowned-upon. Is this
>correct? And if so, why?

>
You got the wrong impression. It's not frowned upon. It just is a lot of
extra effort to implemnt & thus makes the development of "normal" features
more complex.
>
Diez
--

http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

>