Hi Roger
I am impressed (i always suspected Python programmers are smart no doubt about it).
But what about the case where they join different sources like the one here
Thanks for teaching me :-) i am thankful for that
regards
Hrishy
names = ["Burke", "Connor",
"Frank", "Everett",
"Albert", "George",
"Harris", "David"]
result = [each.upper() for each in names if len(each) == 5]
result.sort()
for each in result: print each
Yes clearly 'the Python crowd' must admit LINQ is
'much better', I'm
sold, in fact off to download my "Free, but limited
editions of Visual
Studio 2005 for a single programming language supported by
.NET" right away!
OK so maybe I'm being naive here but it looks to me
like this new
paradigm's big idea is to use a python + SQL type
syntax to access data
in random objects. Big whoop. It's not that difficult
to write a
generators that wraps XML files and databases is it?
What am I missing here?
Roger Heathcote.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I am impressed (i always suspected Python programmers are smart no doubt about it).
But what about the case where they join different sources like the one here
Thanks for teaching me :-) i am thankful for that
regards
Hrishy
names = ["Burke", "Connor",
"Frank", "Everett",
"Albert", "George",
"Harris", "David"]
result = [each.upper() for each in names if len(each) == 5]
result.sort()
for each in result: print each
Yes clearly 'the Python crowd' must admit LINQ is
'much better', I'm
sold, in fact off to download my "Free, but limited
editions of Visual
Studio 2005 for a single programming language supported by
.NET" right away!
OK so maybe I'm being naive here but it looks to me
like this new
paradigm's big idea is to use a python + SQL type
syntax to access data
in random objects. Big whoop. It's not that difficult
to write a
generators that wraps XML files and databases is it?
What am I missing here?
Roger Heathcote.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list