Re: Linq to Python

[hrishy]

Hi Terry

Oops i never realised the mistake i have commited

I apologise
(i thought changing the subject line would make a new thread)
I apologise
(I thought Python programmers were smart and they did know what LINQ was)
I don't apologise
( i dont apologise for the third one not sounding cocky here but i did google but nothing much came up thats when i posted the question here since i always see Python programmers are somehow smarter then programmers in other langauges i don't know if its the language or the programmers themselves that make them smart)

regards
Hrishy




--- On Tue, 23/9/08, Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.e duwrote:

From: Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.e du>
Subject: Re: Linq to Python
To: python-list@python.org
Date: Tuesday, 23 September, 2008, 7:51 PM

Will LINQ be ported to Python ?

I have three suggestions:

1. When starting a new thread, start a *new* thread.
Don't tack a new,
unrelated subject onto an existing thread. Your post will
not be seen
by people with readers that collapse thread and who do not
happen to
read the 'Python is slow?' thread.

2. Also, give enough informaton that people can understand
your question
without searching the web and guessing. In particular,
that do *you*
mean by LINQ? The game? The .NET component? Or something
else?

3. Before posting, search the Python manuals or the web a
bit for an
answer. If you mean the .NET component, googling
'Python LINQ' should
partly answer your question.

tjr

--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

[Grant Edwards]

Re: Linq to Python

On 2008-09-24, Bruno Desthuilliers <bdesth.quelque chose@free.quel quepart.frwrote :

hrishy a écrit :
(snip)
>
>

>I apologise
>(I thought Python programmers were smart and they did know what LINQ was)

>
Is there really any relation between "being smart" and knowing anything
about the latest MS fad ?

God, I hope not -- or I'd rather be stupid.

--
Grant