Re: no string.downer() ?
En Thu, 28 Aug 2008 02:52:42 -0300, Fredrik Lundh <fredrik@python ware.com>
escribi�:
Yes. And Common Lisp has used the same very names for a longer time than
Python itself existed, so I don't agree with many comments on this thread.
--
Gabriel Genellina
En Thu, 28 Aug 2008 02:52:42 -0300, Fredrik Lundh <fredrik@python ware.com>
escribi�:
Asun Friere wrote:
>
>
prior exposure to Ruby might explain this, right? (iirc, they use
"upcase" and "downcase") .
>
>Never ascribe to humour that which can be adequately explained by
>increadible stupidity! On the other hand given up/down vs. high/low,
>upper/downer might appear logical to someone who doesn't know that
>"downcase" is called 'lowercase.'
>increadible stupidity! On the other hand given up/down vs. high/low,
>upper/downer might appear logical to someone who doesn't know that
>"downcase" is called 'lowercase.'
prior exposure to Ruby might explain this, right? (iirc, they use
"upcase" and "downcase") .
Python itself existed, so I don't agree with many comments on this thread.
--
Gabriel Genellina
Comment