Re: Native Code vs. Python code for modules

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Paddy

    Re: Native Code vs. Python code for modules

    On Jul 30, 4:56 am, koblas <kob...@gmail.c omwrote:
    Ruby has been getting pummeled for the last year or more on the
    performance subject.  They've been working hard at improving it.  From
    my arm chair perspective Python is sitting on it's laurels and not
    taking this as seriously as it probably should.
    I personally DON'T think that the developers should be chasing down
    every micro-benchmark. Someone has to look-up and see the bigger
    picture.
    If you take a look at a larger set of micro benchmarks, then Ruby
    is below par when compared to Python and Perl on speed. I had the
    misfortune to read their development group entries when a critical
    bug was 'fixed' by a release from Japan that didn't have enough
    testing and so think the Ruby development 'group' have problems of
    quality that they also need to address. (And are doing I think by
    adding to their test-suite).

    PyPy and previous tools like Psyco are ways in which Python
    developers are continuing to see above the eternal grind of micro-
    optimising the C-interpreter to try and give us tools that can
    approach compiled language speeds from the language we love.
    I like to think of it as working smarter rather than harder - the
    brains a much better muscle :-)

    - Paddy.


Working...