Re: Not entirely serious: recursive lambda?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Cameron Simpson

    Re: Not entirely serious: recursive lambda?

    On 20Jul2008 00:08, Kay Schluehr <kay.schluehr@g mx.netwrote:
    | Google was not my friend on this one, and I suspect there is no
    | answer.
    |
    | Even the Great Google can't help if you don't use the right
    | keywords ;)

    Actually, I was shown an useful Google search syntax the other day:

    Searching for:

    foo

    looks just for "foo", but searching for:

    ~foo

    matches similar words.

    This came up in a discussion of web sites that use badly chosen keywords (the
    NSW Police gun licensing information talks only about "firearms", making it
    surprisingly hard to find; not that I have or want a gun license, but it was
    the example discussed).

    Cheers,
    --
    Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.auD oD#743


    Humans are incapable of securely storing high quality cryptographic
    keys and they have unacceptable speed and accuracy when performing
    cryptographic operations. (They are also large, expensive to maintain
    diffcult to manage and they pollute the environment.) It is astonishing
    that these devices continue to be manufactured and deployed. But they
    are suffciently pervasive that we must design our protocols around
    their limitations. - C Kaufman, R Perlman, M Speciner
    _Network Security: PRIVATE Communication in a
    PUBLIC World_, Prentice Hall, 1995, pp. 205.
Working...