Cameron Simpson wrote:
Hum, what about the last file in the sequence?
I think polling file's size maybe a good indicator, as Ethan proposed.
Best regards,
Manuel.
On 09Jul2008 15:54, Ethan Furman <ethan@stonelea f.uswrote:
>
If you know that files appear in sequence (a single serial upload
process, not multiple uploaders) you can augument this with a check
that an additional file has started to upload, ergo the current file
has finished. Of course, only you can decide if this might be relied upon.
>
Cheers,
>The solution my team has used is to monitor the file size. If the file
>has stopped growing for x amount of time (we use 45 seconds) the file is
>done copying. Not elegant, but it works.
>has stopped growing for x amount of time (we use 45 seconds) the file is
>done copying. Not elegant, but it works.
If you know that files appear in sequence (a single serial upload
process, not multiple uploaders) you can augument this with a check
that an additional file has started to upload, ergo the current file
has finished. Of course, only you can decide if this might be relied upon.
>
Cheers,
I think polling file's size maybe a good indicator, as Ethan proposed.
Best regards,
Manuel.