imap4_SSL from behind a proxy server

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dave

    imap4_SSL from behind a proxy server

    First to admit I'm a newbie at Python, IMAP, or SSL. And it's been a
    long time since I've posted anything to a Usenet group. But I've
    spent countless hours spinning my wheels on this one, so I thought I'd
    ask for help.

    I'm trying write some Python code to connect to Gmail from work, where
    I need to direct all non-HTTP traffic through a proxy server. Can
    anyone provide syntax which would redirect the imap4_SSL method
    through a proxy server:port? I suspect there are some environment
    variables which, when set, will do this very easily and elegantly. I
    also suspect there is a really complicated way to 'wrap' the imap
    classes so as to force requests to go through a proxy which, as a
    newbie, I am trying to avoid.

    FYI, I'm currently running Python 2.5.2. via IDLE on Windows XP. But
    when this project is done, I will move it to Linux.

    Thanks for any help.

    Dave
    fkaprince, at Gmail, dot-com
  • Diez B. Roggisch

    #2
    Re: imap4_SSL from behind a proxy server

    Dave schrieb:
    First to admit I'm a newbie at Python, IMAP, or SSL. And it's been a
    long time since I've posted anything to a Usenet group. But I've
    spent countless hours spinning my wheels on this one, so I thought I'd
    ask for help.
    >
    I'm trying write some Python code to connect to Gmail from work, where
    I need to direct all non-HTTP traffic through a proxy server. Can
    anyone provide syntax which would redirect the imap4_SSL method
    through a proxy server:port? I suspect there are some environment
    variables which, when set, will do this very easily and elegantly. I
    also suspect there is a really complicated way to 'wrap' the imap
    classes so as to force requests to go through a proxy which, as a
    newbie, I am trying to avoid.
    >
    FYI, I'm currently running Python 2.5.2. via IDLE on Windows XP. But
    when this project is done, I will move it to Linux.
    AFAIK that's simply not possible. Proxying that is not transparent is
    only (for practical matters, there might be esoteric protocols that do
    that as well) defined for HTTP. So "I need to direct all non-HTTP
    traffic through a proxy server." does not make much sense - at least to me.


    In other words: there is no such thing as general proxying, and thus no
    support in any library e.g. imaplib or such.

    Do you have an example of an application (e.g. mailclient or such) that
    *does* support the above scenario?

    Diez

    Comment

    • =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Michael_Str=F6der?=

      #3
      Re: imap4_SSL from behind a proxy server

      Diez B. Roggisch wrote:
      Dave schrieb:
      >I'm trying write some Python code to connect to Gmail from work, where
      >I need to direct all non-HTTP traffic through a proxy server.
      >
      AFAIK that's simply not possible.
      It's possible.
      Proxying that is not transparent is
      only (for practical matters, there might be esoteric protocols that do
      that as well) defined for HTTP.
      Your mixing terms here.
      So "I need to direct all non-HTTP traffic through a proxy server."
      does not make much sense - at least to me.
      The fact you don't know about it does not mean it does not make much
      sense. ;-)

      E.g. when using HTTPS the proxy does not see any HTTP traffic except the
      HTTP CONNECT going to the proxy itself.
      Do you have an example of an application (e.g. mailclient or such) that
      *does* support the above scenario?
      Widely used: OpenVPN, Netscape Communicator 4.x (at least for NNTPS - 10
      years ago) etc.

      The key-word to search for is HTTP CONNECT method. I'd try to implement
      a file-like object for it and pass that into imap module. But the proxy
      configuration may disallow it. Firewall admins also know the commonly
      used freemail services.

      Ciao, Michael.

      Comment

      Working...