IDE on the level of Eclipse or DEVc++?

[Jorge Godoy]

Re: IDE on the level of Eclipse or DEVc++?

cokofreedom@gma il.com wrote:

How is emacs on a windows platform?

Except for Windows using _emacs instead of .emacs, it was the same I had on Linux, last time I tried it... :-)

There are packages for Windows that have a lot of things pre-packaged to make it feel more like a Windows application, including keyboard shortcuts.

--
Jorge Godoy <jgodoy@gmail.c om>

[Richard G Riley]

Re: IDE on the level of Eclipse or DEVc++?

Jorge Godoy <jgodoy@gmail.c omwrites:

cokofreedom@gma il.com wrote:
>

>How is emacs on a windows platform?

>
Except for Windows using _emacs instead of .emacs, it was the same I had on Linux, last time I tried it... :-)
>
There are packages for Windows that have a lot of things pre-packaged
to make it feel more like a Windows application, including keyboard
shortcuts.

More specifically : cua-mode

[Bruno Desthuilliers]

Re: IDE on the level of Eclipse or DEVc++?

cokofreedom@gma il.com a écrit :

On Jun 25, 12:38 pm, Jorge Godoy <jgo...@gmail.c omwrote:

>Ben Finney wrote:

>>Bruno Desthuilliers <bruno.42.desth uilli...@websit eburo.invalidwr ites:
>>>If you're into clickodroms, you may want to have a look at Eric too.
>>>As far as i'm concerned, I still wait for something that would be
>>>worth dropping emacs + python-mode + ecb.
>>I'm having the most success with this combination, yes. Though ecb is
>>rather non-Emacs-like in its configuration, and seems to strongly
>>expect to be run in graphical mode, it is still very powerful.

>Heh... I'm another one that keeps trying new things but comes back to Emacs all the time.
>>
>Eclipse is too heavy, NetBeans has a poor support, Eric is too "mousy"...
>>
>--
>Jorge Godoy <jgo...@gmail.c om>

>
How is emacs on a windows platform?

err... alien ?-)