On Jun 18, 10:00 pm, "ram.rac...@gma il.com" <ram.rac...@gma il.com>
wrote:
Oops, the "See my comment to Brodie" was not intended to you.
I meant to say:
I might try your suggestion, but for now mpmath will do. Now I'm
working on implementing the electromagnetic force, so I'll get back to
this issue later.
wrote:
On Jun 18, 3:02 am, Phil Hobbs
>
<pcdhSpamMeSens el...@electroop tical.netwrote:
>
>
>
>
>
See my comment to Brodie.
>
<pcdhSpamMeSens el...@electroop tical.netwrote:
ram.rac...@gmai l.com wrote:
That was suggested. Problem is, that sometimes the velocities are near
zero. So this solution, by itself, is not general enough.
zero. So this solution, by itself, is not general enough.
Are you sure? I sort of doubt that you're spending zillions of
iterations getting closer and closer to zero. It would be worth
actually doing the error analysis and finding out.
iterations getting closer and closer to zero. It would be worth
actually doing the error analysis and finding out.
Cheers,
Phil Hobbs
See my comment to Brodie.
I meant to say:
I might try your suggestion, but for now mpmath will do. Now I'm
working on implementing the electromagnetic force, so I'll get back to
this issue later.