-On [20080616 10:41], Armin Ronacher (armin.ronacher @active-4.com) wrote:
I fully support adding this. In my work I have had to create this datatype a
few times already.
The suggested design choices seem logical to me.
+1
--
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(-at-)in-nomine.org/ asmodai
イェルーン ラウフãƒãƒƒ ク ヴァン デル ウェルヴェ ン
http://www.in-nomine.org/ | http://www.rangaku.org/ | GPG: 2EAC625B
Of all that is to come, the Dream has just begun...
>This PEP proposes an ordered dictionary as a new data structure for
>the ``collections`` module, called "odict" in this PEP for short.
>the ``collections`` module, called "odict" in this PEP for short.
few times already.
The suggested design choices seem logical to me.
+1
--
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(-at-)in-nomine.org/ asmodai
イェルーン ラウフãƒãƒƒ ク ヴァン デル ウェルヴェ ン
http://www.in-nomine.org/ | http://www.rangaku.org/ | GPG: 2EAC625B
Of all that is to come, the Dream has just begun...