named tuple mutability

[castironpi@gmail.com]

I'm concerned over the future of Python. Should tuples be named?

[Raymond Hettinger]

Re: named tuple mutability

> Should tuples be named?

Yes.

[castironpi@gmail.com]

Re: named tuple mutability

On May 14, 12:41 pm, Raymond Hettinger <pyt...@rcn.com wrote:

 Should tuples be named?

>
Yes.

Not clearly should. Sequences ought be. If you're on the right time
for both, can't the library hold the B?

[castironpi@gmail.com]

Re: named tuple mutability

On May 14, 1:04 pm, castiro...@gmai l.com wrote:

On May 14, 12:41 pm, Raymond Hettinger <pyt...@rcn.com wrote:
>

> Should tuples be named?

>

Yes.

>
Not clearly should.  Sequences ought be.  If you're on the right time
for both, can't the library hold the B?

On the web, you can. Both data types can go in the docs... sorry for
the lunacy, I'm hacking.

[bruno.desthuilliers@gmail.com]

Re: named tuple mutability

On 14 mai, 18:20, castiro...@gmai l.com wrote:

I'm concerned over the future of Python. Should tuples be named?

Obviously not, unless they should.

[Ben Finney]

Re: named tuple mutability

"bruno.desthuil liers@gmail.com " <bruno.desthuil liers@gmail.com writes:

On 14 mai, 18:20, castiro...@gmai l.com wrote:

I'm concerned over the future of Python. Should tuples be named?

>
Obviously not, unless they should.

Clearly they should, unless not.

--
\ “It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at |
`\ once.” —David Hume |
_o__) |
Ben Finney

[castironpi@gmail.com]

Re: named tuple mutability

On May 14, 5:01 pm, Ben Finney <bignose+hate s-s...@benfinney. id.au>
wrote:

"bruno.desthuil li...@gmail.com " <bruno.desthuil li...@gmail.com writes:

On 14 mai, 18:20, castiro...@gmai l.com wrote:

I'm concerned over the future of Python.  Should tuples be named?

>

Obviously not, unless they should.

>
Clearly they should, unless not.
>
Ben Finney

I have plenty of uses for them!

[castironpi@gmail.com]

Re: named tuple mutability

On May 14, 5:28 pm, castiro...@gmai l.com wrote:

On May 14, 5:01 pm, Ben Finney <bignose+hate s-s...@benfinney. id.au>
wrote:
>

"bruno.desthuil li...@gmail.com " <bruno.desthuil li...@gmail.com writes:

On 14 mai, 18:20, castiro...@gmai l.com wrote:
I'm concerned over the future of Python.  Should tuples be named?

>

Obviously not, unless they should.

>

Clearly they should, unless not.

>

Ben Finney

>
I have plenty of uses for them!

FOR INSTANCE!

def zoop_zoop_zoop( self ): pass

[castironpi@gmail.com]

Re: named tuple mutability

On May 14, 12:41 pm, Raymond Hettinger <pyt...@rcn.com wrote:

 Should tuples be named?

>
Yes.

Good; they're named sequences.

[castironpi@gmail.com]

Re: named tuple mutability

On May 14, 6:21 pm, castiro...@gmai l.com wrote:

On May 14, 12:41 pm, Raymond Hettinger <pyt...@rcn.com wrote:
>

> Should tuples be named?

>

Yes.

>
Good; they're named sequences.

Can anyone make sling-shots of words? What's the splatter?

[Bruno Desthuilliers]

Re: named tuple mutability

Ben Finney a écrit :

"bruno.desthuil liers@gmail.com " <bruno.desthuil liers@gmail.com writes:
>

>On 14 mai, 18:20, castiro...@gmai l.com wrote:

>>I'm concerned over the future of Python. Should tuples be named?

>Obviously not, unless they should.

>
Clearly they should, unless not.
>

May we agree to disagree here - unless we don't ?

[Ben Finney]

Re: named tuple mutability

Bruno Desthuilliers <bruno.42.desth uilliers@websit eburo.invalidwr ites:

May we agree to disagree here - unless we don't ?

Absolutely not, except where not applicable.

--
\ "I always wanted to be somebody. I see now that I should have |
`\ been more specific." -- Lily Tomlin |
_o__) |
Ben Finney

[Bruno Desthuilliers]

Re: named tuple mutability

Ben Finney a écrit :

Bruno Desthuilliers <bruno.42.desth uilliers@websit eburo.invalidwr ites:
>

>May we agree to disagree here - unless we don't ?

>
Absolutely not, except where not applicable.
>

and vice versa.