overriding = operator

[Anton Mellit]

Hi,

I am developing something like a compiler in Python, a library that
would help to generate machine-language code. One of the features is
the following. When I want to generate a piece of code I want to
declare variables as follows:

x = var()
y = var()

This would generate no code, but it would mean that I need, say, two
32-bit integer variables. Then whenever I write something like x+y,
the '+' operator is overriden in such a way that a code which computes
the sum is generated. What I also want to do, I want to write
something like

z = var()
z = x + y

and I want a code which takes the sum of x and y and puts it in z to
be generated. However in python z = x + y already has its meaning and
it does something different from what I want. So I need something like
'overriding' =, which is impossible, but I look for a systematic
approach to do something instead. It seems there are two ways to do
what I need:

1. Implement a method 'assign' which generates the corresponding code
to store value:

z.assign(x + y)

2. Do the same as 1., but via property set methods. For example, this
would look cleaner:

z.value = x + y

Which of these is preferrable? Does anyone know any alternative ways?

Anton

[Paul McGuire]

Re: overriding = operator

On Apr 22, 8:47 am, "Anton Mellit" <mel...@gmail.c omwrote:

I need something like
'overriding' =, which is impossible, but I look for a systematic
approach to do something instead. It seems there are two ways to do
what I need:
>
1. Implement a method 'assign' which generates the corresponding code
to store value:
>
z.assign(x + y)
>
2. Do the same as 1., but via property set methods. For example, this
would look cleaner:
>
z.value = x + y
>
Which of these is preferrable? Does anyone know any alternative ways?
>
Anton

If you are willing to accept '<<=' as meaning 'assign to existing'
instead of 'left shift in place', you can override this operator using
the __ilshift__ method.

We used this technique in C++/CORBA code back in the 90's to "inject"
values into CORBA::Any variables.

-- Paul

[Anton Mellit]

Re: overriding = operator

On Apr 22, 3:54 pm, Paul McGuire <pt...@austin.r r.comwrote:

On Apr 22, 8:47 am, "Anton Mellit" <mel...@gmail.c omwrote:
>
>
>

I need something like
'overriding' =, which is impossible, but I look for a systematic
approach to do something instead. It seems there are two ways to do
what I need:

>

1. Implement a method 'assign' which generates the corresponding code
to store value:

>

z.assign(x + y)

>

2. Do the same as 1., but via property set methods. For example, this
would look cleaner:

>

z.value = x + y

>

Which of these is preferrable? Does anyone know any alternative ways?

>

Anton

>
If you are willing to accept '<<=' as meaning 'assign to existing'
instead of 'left shift in place', you can override this operator using
the __ilshift__ method.
>
We used this technique in C++/CORBA code back in the 90's to "inject"
values into CORBA::Any variables.
>
-- Paul

Great idea! It conflicts with 'left shift in place', which i also
need, but '=' seems more important.

Anton