IronPython vs CPython: faster in 1.6 times?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Fuzzyman

    #16
    Re: IronPython vs CPython: faster in 1.6 times?

    On Feb 5, 7:47 pm, Stefan Behnel <stefan...@behn el.dewrote:
    bearophileH...@ lycos.com schrieb:
    >
    Mike C. Fletcher:
    Not sure if Mono also provides a speedup.
    >
    There is a set of good benchmarks here, the answer is negative:
    http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/sa...?test=all&lang...
    >
    This doesn't look like Mono to me:
    >
    IronPython1.1 (1.1) on .NET 2.0.50727.42

    Running on Debian? Fairly unlikely. :-)

    Fuzzyman
    IronPython in Action offers a comprehensive, hands-on introduction to Microsoft's exciting new approach for programming the .NET framework. It approaches IronPython as a first class .NET language, fully integrated with the .NET environment, Visual Studio, and even the open-source Mono implementation. You'll learn how IronPython can be embedded as a ready-made scripting language into C# and VB.NET programs, used for writing full applications or for web development with ASP. Even better, you'll see how IronPython works in Silverlight for client-side web programming.

    >
    Stefan

    Comment

    • Carsten Haese

      #17
      Re: IronPython vs CPython: faster in 1.6 times?

      On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 13:39 -0800, Fuzzyman wrote:
      On Feb 5, 7:47 pm, Stefan Behnel <stefan...@behn el.dewrote:
      bearophileH...@ lycos.com schrieb:
      Mike C. Fletcher:
      >Not sure if Mono also provides a speedup.
      There is a set of good benchmarks here, the answer is negative:
      >http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/sa...test=all〈...
      This doesn't look like Mono to me:

      IronPython1.1 (1.1) on .NET 2.0.50727.42
      >
      >
      Running on Debian? Fairly unlikely. :-)
      Well, that *is* what the version string reports for IronPython on Mono
      on Linux:

      $ uname -sr
      Linux 2.6.18-1.2200.fc5smp
      $ mono ipy.exe
      IronPython 1.1 (1.1) on .NET 2.0.50727.42
      Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

      --
      Carsten Haese



      Comment

      • Stefan Behnel

        #18
        Re: IronPython vs CPython: faster in 1.6 times?

        Isaac Gouy wrote:
        On Feb 5, 11:47 am, Stefan Behnel <stefan...@behn el.dewrote:
        >bearophileH... @lycos.com schrieb:
        >>
        >>Mike C. Fletcher:
        >>>Not sure if Mono also provides a speedup.
        >>There is a set of good benchmarks here, the answer is negative:
        >>http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/sa...?test=all&lang...
        >This doesn't look like Mono to me:
        >>
        > IronPython 1.1 (1.1) on .NET 2.0.50727.42
        >>
        >Stefan
        >
        Have you actually looked at the version string from IronPython-1.1-
        Bin.zip running on Mono?
        Why? Would that look like Mono? :)

        Stefan

        Comment

        • Stefan Behnel

          #19
          Re: IronPython vs CPython: faster in 1.6 times?

          Fuzzyman wrote:
          On Feb 5, 7:47 pm, Stefan Behnel <stefan...@behn el.dewrote:
          >bearophileH... @lycos.com schrieb:
          >>
          >>Mike C. Fletcher:
          >>>Not sure if Mono also provides a speedup.
          >>There is a set of good benchmarks here, the answer is negative:
          >>http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/sa...?test=all&lang...
          >This doesn't look like Mono to me:
          >>
          > IronPython1.1 (1.1) on .NET 2.0.50727.42
          >
          >
          Running on Debian? Fairly unlikely. :-)
          Why? Wasn't .NET supposed to be platform independent code and all that? ;)

          Stefan

          Comment

          • Isaac Gouy

            #20
            Re: IronPython vs CPython: faster in 1.6 times?

            On Feb 6, 1:54 pm, Stefan Behnel <stefan...@behn el.dewrote:
            Isaac Gouy wrote:
            On Feb 5, 11:47 am, Stefan Behnel <stefan...@behn el.dewrote:
            bearophileH...@ lycos.com schrieb:
            >
            >Mike C. Fletcher:
            >>Not sure if Mono also provides a speedup.
            >There is a set of good benchmarks here, the answer is negative:
            >>http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/sa...test=all〈...
            This doesn't look like Mono to me:
            >
            IronPython 1.1 (1.1) on .NET 2.0.50727.42
            >
            Stefan
            >
            Have you actually looked at the version string from IronPython-1.1-
            Bin.zip running on Mono?
            >
            Why? Would that look like Mono? :)
            >
            Stefan
            Why? Because then you'd be doing more than expressing your personal
            ignorance.

            Comment

            • Fuzzyman

              #21
              Re: IronPython vs CPython: faster in 1.6 times?

              On Feb 5, 5:31 pm, dmitrey <dmitrey.kros.. .@scipy.orgwrot e:
              Hi all,
              the urlhttp://torquedev.blogs pot.com/2008/02/changes-in-air.html
              (blog of a game developers)
              saysIronPythoni s faster than CPython in 1.6 times.
              Is it really true?
              If yes, what areIronPythondr awbacks vs CPython?
              And is it possible to useIronPythonin Linux?
              >
              D.
              Another interesting little benchmark of CPython and IronPython. Can't
              see the code, but it looks like an implementation of the 11 queens
              problem and IronPython comes out a clear winner on this one. (Looks
              like no benchmark for psyco.)

              sokoide's blog - red, green, refactor, eat, sleep


              Michael
              IronPython in Action offers a comprehensive, hands-on introduction to Microsoft's exciting new approach for programming the .NET framework. It approaches IronPython as a first class .NET language, fully integrated with the .NET environment, Visual Studio, and even the open-source Mono implementation. You'll learn how IronPython can be embedded as a ready-made scripting language into C# and VB.NET programs, used for writing full applications or for web development with ASP. Even better, you'll see how IronPython works in Silverlight for client-side web programming.

              Comment

              • bearophileHUGS@lycos.com

                #22
                Re: IronPython vs CPython: faster in 1.6 times?

                Fuzzyman:
                Another interesting little benchmark of CPython and IronPython. Can't
                see the code, but it looks like an implementation of the 11 queens
                problem and IronPython comes out a clear winner on this one. (Looks
                like no benchmark for psyco.)
                If you want a more reliable set of benchmarks, take all the shootout
                benchmarks, and try them on IronPython on dotnet, on CPython and on
                Psyco.

                Bye,
                bearophile

                Comment

                • Fuzzyman

                  #23
                  Re: IronPython vs CPython: faster in 1.6 times?

                  On Feb 12, 7:49 pm, bearophileH...@ lycos.com wrote:
                  Fuzzyman:
                  >
                  Another interesting little benchmark of CPython and IronPython. Can't
                  see the code, but it looks like an implementation of the 11 queens
                  problem and IronPython comes out a clear winner on this one. (Looks
                  like no benchmark for psyco.)
                  >
                  If you want a more reliable set of benchmarks, take all the shootout
                  benchmarks, and try them on IronPython on dotnet, on CPython and on
                  Psyco.
                  >
                  Go for it!
                  Bye,
                  bearophile

                  Comment

                  Working...