cStringIO unicode weirdness

[Paul Rubin]

Python 2.5 (r25:51908, Oct 6 2006, 15:24:43)
[GCC 4.1.2 20060928 (prerelease) (Ubuntu 4.1.1-13ubuntu4)] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright" , "credits" or "license" for more information.

>>import StringIO, cStringIO
>>StringIO.Stri ngIO('a').getva lue()

'a'

>>cStringIO.Str ingIO('a').getv alue()

'a'

>>StringIO.Stri ngIO(u'a').getv alue()

u'a'

>>cStringIO.Str ingIO(u'a').get value()

'a\x00\x00\x00'

>>>

I would have thought StringIO and cStringIO would return the
same result for this ascii-encodeable string. Worse:

>>StringIO.Stri ngIO(u'a').getv alue().encode(' utf-8').decode('utf-8')

u'a'

does the right thing, but

>>cStringIO.Str ingIO(u'a').get value().encode( 'utf-8').decode('utf-8')

u'a\x00\x00\x00 '

looks bogus. Am I misunderstandin g something?

[John Machin]

Re: cStringIO unicode weirdness

On Jun 19, 8:56 am, Paul Rubin <http://phr...@NOSPAM.i nvalidwrote:

Python 2.5 (r25:51908, Oct 6 2006, 15:24:43)
[GCC 4.1.2 20060928 (prerelease) (Ubuntu 4.1.1-13ubuntu4)] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright" , "credits" or "license" for more information.

>>import StringIO, cStringIO
>>StringIO.Stri ngIO('a').getva lue()

'a'

>>cStringIO.Str ingIO('a').getv alue()

'a'

>>StringIO.Stri ngIO(u'a').getv alue()

u'a'

>>cStringIO.Str ingIO(u'a').get value()

'a\x00\x00\x00'

>>>

>
I would have thought StringIO and cStringIO would return the
same result for this ascii-encodeable string.

Looks like a bug to me.

Worse:
>

>>StringIO.Stri ngIO(u'a').getv alue().encode(' utf-8').decode('utf-8')

u'a'
>
does the right thing, but
>

>>cStringIO.Str ingIO(u'a').get value().encode( 'utf-8').decode('utf-8')

u'a\x00\x00\x00 '
>
looks bogus. Am I misunderstandin g something?

Not worse, no more bogus than before. Note that an explicit design
feature of utf8 is that ASCII characters (ord(c) < 128) are unchanged
by the transformation.

>>'a\x00\x00\x0 0'.encode('utf-8')

# IMPLICIT conversion to unicode (effectively .decode('ascii' )), then
encoding as utf8
'a\x00\x00\x00' # no change to original buggy result

>>>
>>'a\x00\x00\x0 0'.decode('utf-8')

u'a\x00\x00\x00 ' # as expected

>>>

[Josiah Carlson]

Re: cStringIO unicode weirdness

Paul Rubin wrote:

Python 2.5 (r25:51908, Oct 6 2006, 15:24:43)
[GCC 4.1.2 20060928 (prerelease) (Ubuntu 4.1.1-13ubuntu4)] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright" , "credits" or "license" for more information.

>>import StringIO, cStringIO
>>StringIO.Stri ngIO('a').getva lue()

'a'

>>cStringIO.Str ingIO('a').getv alue()

'a'

>>StringIO.Stri ngIO(u'a').getv alue()

u'a'

>>cStringIO.Str ingIO(u'a').get value()

'a\x00\x00\x00'

>>>

>
I would have thought StringIO and cStringIO would return the
same result for this ascii-encodeable string. Worse:

You would be wrong. The behavior of StringIO and cStringIO are
different under certain circumstances, and those differences are
intended. Among them is when they are confronted with unicode, as you
saw. Another is when provided with an initializer...

>>cs = cStringIO.Strin gIO('a')
>>cs.write('b ')

Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
AttributeError: 'cStringIO.Stri ngI' object has no attribute 'write'

>>s = StringIO.String IO('a')
>>s.write('b' )

There is a summer of code project that is working towards making them
behave the same, but the results will need to wait until Python 2.6
and/or 3.0 . Note that there are a few "closed, won't fix" bug reports
regarding these exact same issues in the Python bug tracker at sourceforge.

- Josiah

[Paul Rubin]

Re: cStringIO unicode weirdness

Josiah Carlson <josiah.carlson @sbcglobal.netw rites:

You would be wrong. The behavior of StringIO and cStringIO are
different under certain circumstances, and those differences are
intended. Among them is when they are confronted with unicode, as you
saw. Another is when provided with an initializer...

The doc says there's only supposed to be a difference if the unicode
can't be represented as ascii. That is not the case with the example
I posted.

There is a summer of code project that is working towards making them
behave the same, but the results will need to wait until Python 2.6
and/or 3.0 . Note that there are a few "closed, won't fix" bug
reports regarding these exact same issues in the Python bug tracker at
sourceforge.

Thanks, this helps. At minimum the 2.5 docs should be updated to
explain the issues.