Re: Python Windows Editors
stef a écrit :
Yes, test some, and choose one.
[personnaly, I use Notepad++ on Windows, and Kate on Linux, just
editors, not IDEs]
....its a Wiki... click the right link and update it:
Its difficult, apart from their stability (which can get better or bad
on the time, upen their evolution and the evolution of the libraries
they use), its a large part of personnal taste.
IMHO you can only have functionnal comparison of such tools. I started a
synthesis page of editors/IDEs functionnalitie s in the pythonfr wiki
(french) some (long) time ago...
But a Wiki form seem to not be the best way for such comparison... a
dynamic page with a database and some dynamic request would be better.
A+
Laurent.
stef a écrit :
Laurent Pointal wrote:
just what I said, TOO many ;-)
>W. Watson a écrit :
>>
>Have you take a look at the IDEs page in the Python Wiki (python.org)?
>>
>http://wiki.python.org/moin/Integrat...ntEnvironments
>>
>>
>>
>>I downloaded python-2.5.msi and installed it. I believe its editor is
>>IDE. I understand there's a Win editor called pythonwin. I believe it's
>>in the download pywin32-210.win32-py2.5.exe, but I'm not sure if this
>>exe file has just the editor or all of Python. Comments? If not how do I
>>get the PythonWin editor by itself?
>>>
>>>
>>IDE. I understand there's a Win editor called pythonwin. I believe it's
>>in the download pywin32-210.win32-py2.5.exe, but I'm not sure if this
>>exe file has just the editor or all of Python. Comments? If not how do I
>>get the PythonWin editor by itself?
>>>
>>>
>>
>http://wiki.python.org/moin/Integrat...ntEnvironments
>>
>>
[personnaly, I use Notepad++ on Windows, and Kate on Linux, just
editors, not IDEs]
and of course how do you keep these pages up-to-date ?
Zeus (commercial) isn't mentioned ...
Zeus (commercial) isn't mentioned ...
SPE which has great credits, but can't be found, and if you find it
somewhere, no manual and it crashes within 30 seconds (repeatly) ;-)
>
Not an easy task I guess,
but it would be nice to have some voting system,
(maybe only to allow voting when you have compared at least 2 programs)
that would represent the current state,
and in which new programs would have a fair chance to start.
somewhere, no manual and it crashes within 30 seconds (repeatly) ;-)
>
Not an easy task I guess,
but it would be nice to have some voting system,
(maybe only to allow voting when you have compared at least 2 programs)
that would represent the current state,
and in which new programs would have a fair chance to start.
on the time, upen their evolution and the evolution of the libraries
they use), its a large part of personnal taste.
IMHO you can only have functionnal comparison of such tools. I started a
synthesis page of editors/IDEs functionnalitie s in the pythonfr wiki
(french) some (long) time ago...
But a Wiki form seem to not be the best way for such comparison... a
dynamic page with a database and some dynamic request would be better.
A+
Laurent.
Comment