testing array of logicals

[Janto Dreijer]

Re: testing array of logicals


Janto Dreijer wrote:

John Henry wrote:

Simon Forman wrote:

False not in logflags

>
Or, if your values aren't already bools
>
False not in (bool(n) for n in logflags)

Very intriguing use of "not in"...

>
Is there a reason why you didn't write
True in (bool(n) for n in logflags)

<slaps foreheaddoh! Never mind.

[Simon Forman]

Re: testing array of logicals

Janto Dreijer wrote:

Janto Dreijer wrote:

John Henry wrote:

Simon Forman wrote:
>
False not in logflags
>

Or, if your values aren't already bools

False not in (bool(n) for n in logflags)
>
Very intriguing use of "not in"...

Is there a reason why you didn't write
True in (bool(n) for n in logflags)

>
<slaps foreheaddoh! Never mind.

*grin*

[H J van Rooyen]

Re: testing array of logicals


"Janto Dreijer" <jantod@gmail.c omwrote:


|
| Janto Dreijer wrote:
| John Henry wrote:
| Simon Forman wrote:
|
| False not in logflags
|
| >
| Or, if your values aren't already bools
| >
| False not in (bool(n) for n in logflags)
|
| Very intriguing use of "not in"...
| >
| Is there a reason why you didn't write
| True in (bool(n) for n in logflags)
|
| <slaps foreheaddoh! Never mind.
|

*lol* - don't feel bad about this - real programmers make this mistake with a
varying frequency -

>From once every six days or so if you are no good, to once in a lifetime if

you are brilliant, and never only if you are a genius...

First time it bit me I was an apprentice writing in Cobol.

- Hendrik